Intangible capital as a production factor. Firm-level evidence from Austrian microdata

被引:0
作者
Friesenbichler, Klaus [1 ,2 ]
Kuegler, Agnes [1 ]
Schieber-Knoebl, Julia [3 ]
机构
[1] Austrian Inst Econ Res WIFO, Ind Innovat & Int Econ, Arsenal Objekt 20, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
[2] Supply Chain Intelligence Inst Austria ASCII, Vienna, Austria
[3] Stat Austria, Natl Accounts, Vienna, Austria
关键词
Intangible capital; R&D; production function; investment; firm level productivity; INFORMATION-TECHNOLOGY; INVESTMENT; INNOVATION; GROWTH; EUROPE; IMPACT; JAPAN;
D O I
10.1080/00036846.2024.2387369
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We examine the role of intangible capital as a production factor using Austrian firm-level register data. The setting exemplifies the characteristics of an advanced, small, and open economy. Descriptive statistics show that intangible investment has increased over time. The intensive and extensive margins of firms' investments are highly skewed. They differ across sectors. A series of sample splits show that the components of intangible capital play different roles as inputs in the production function. Software and especially licences are important for SMEs and exporters. Research and development play an important role in production in all specifications. For firms that continuously invest in intangible capital, all components of intangible capital gain importance in the production functions. These results complement those found in previous studies and have implications for the strategic orientation of industrial and innovation policy.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   IDENTIFICATION PROPERTIES OF RECENT PRODUCTION FUNCTION ESTIMATORS [J].
Ackerberg, Daniel A. ;
Caves, Kevin ;
Frazer, Garth .
ECONOMETRICA, 2015, 83 (06) :2411-2451
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2022, IN PRESS
[3]   Intangible assets and firm heterogeneity: Evidence from Italy [J].
Arrighetti, Alessandro ;
Landini, Fabio ;
Lasagni, Andrea .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2014, 43 (01) :202-213
[4]   Resource-based theories of competitive advantage:: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view [J].
Barney, JB .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2001, 27 (06) :643-650
[5]   UNBUNDLING TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION AND TFP AT THE FIRM LEVEL: DO INTANGIBLES MATTER? [J].
Battisti, Michele ;
Belloc, Filippo ;
Del Gatto, Massimo .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2015, 24 (02) :390-414
[6]   Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Demirguc-Kunt, Asli .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2006, 30 (11) :2931-2943
[7]   SMEs and Marketing: A Systematic Literature Review [J].
Bocconcelli, Roberta ;
Cioppi, Marco ;
Fortezza, Fulvio ;
Francioni, Barbara ;
Pagano, Alessandro ;
Savelli, Elisabetta ;
Splendiani, Simone .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2018, 20 (02) :227-254
[8]   Intangible capital and productivity at the firm level: a panel data assessment [J].
Bontempi, Maria Elena ;
Mairesse, Jacques .
ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 24 (1-2) :22-51
[9]   Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance [J].
Brynjolfsson, E ;
Hitt, LM .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 14 (04) :23-48
[10]   In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition [J].
Cassiman, B ;
Veugelers, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (01) :68-82