The influence of peer feed-back and peer feed-forward on international students' L2 writing in China's higher education

被引:0
作者
Ouyang, Fan [1 ]
Zhang, Ning [1 ]
Bai, Xianping [1 ]
Liu, Xiaolin [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Coll Educ, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Int Coll, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
L2; writing; peer feedback; peer feed-back; peer feed-forward; PERCEPTIONS; REVISION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1080/02602938.2024.2402540
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Peer feedback has been recognized as a crucial strategy in enhancing L2 writing skills and performance. It addresses common challenges faced by students, such as grammar and spelling errors, limited expression ability, and cultural differences. Peer feed-back and feed-forward are two major approaches to providing peer feedback. However, existing teaching practices overlooked the distinction between peer feed-back and feed-forward, both of which convey different information about students' learning statuses and may have varying influences on L2 writing. Therefore, this research compared the effects of peer feed-back and peer feed-forward on students' L2 writing. 44 international students participated in this research and their essays, the results of the domain knowledge understanding test, the content of peer feed-back and peer feed-forward, and self-reported data were collected. Overall, the findings showed that there were no significant differences between peer feed-back and peer feed-forward conditions on students' L2 writing performance and domain knowledge understanding. Students performed better in producing peer feed-back content than peer feed-forward content. Based on the results, pedagogical implications were proposed to promote peer feedback practices and harness its potentials to improve students' L2 writing quality.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 365
页数:15
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Using feedforward to improve pre-service teachers' academic writing and critical thinking skills [J].
Baroudi, Sandra ;
Aoun, Serena ;
Hamam, Doaa .
FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
[2]   The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing [J].
Bitchener, J ;
Young, S ;
Cameron, D .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2005, 14 (03) :191-205
[3]   A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates' learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study [J].
Cao, Zhenhao ;
Yu, Shulin ;
Huang, Jing .
STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2019, 63 :102-112
[4]   The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback [J].
Carless, David ;
Boud, David .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (08) :1315-1325
[5]   Student revision with peer and expert reviewing [J].
Cho, Kwangsu ;
MacArthur, Charles .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2010, 20 (04) :328-338
[6]  
Duncan N., 2007, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V32, P271, DOI DOI 10.1080/02602930600896498
[7]   Feedforward- or feedback-based group regulation guidance in collaborative groups [J].
Durak, Hatice Yildiz .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2024, 40 (02) :410-436
[8]   Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing [J].
Fan, Yumei ;
Xu, Jinfen .
JOURNAL OF SECOND LANGUAGE WRITING, 2020, 50
[9]   Peer review in the classroom: student perceptions, peer feedback quality and the role of assessment [J].
Gaynor, James W. .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (05) :758-775
[10]   Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning [J].
Gielen, Sarah ;
Peeters, Elien ;
Dochy, Filip ;
Onghena, Patrick ;
Struyven, Katrien .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2010, 20 (04) :304-315