Comprehensive evaluation of fetal renal ultrasound parameters for fetal growth restriction

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Qinxiao [1 ]
Wang, Liang [2 ]
Hu, Mingzi [1 ]
Yang, Sisi [1 ]
Zhang, Wen [1 ]
Chen, Haiying [1 ]
Jiao, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Peoples Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Wenzhou 325000, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Yuying Childrens Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Ultrasound, Wenzhou 325027, Peoples R China
关键词
Fetal growth restriction; Renal ultrasound; Diagnostic efficacy; Multi-parameter evaluation; DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HYPERTENSION; DIAGNOSIS; VELOCITY; HEALTH; VOLUME; ARTERY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36687
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to investigate variances in renal ultrasound parameters between fetuses experiencing fetal growth restriction (FGR) and those with normal intrauterine development, with the intent to offer actionable insights for clinical management. Method: Forty-five pregnant women diagnosed with FGR between 28 and 36 weeks of gestation, who underwent examination at Wenzhou People's Hospital from September 2021 to June 2023, constituted the FGR group. Concurrently, 65 pregnant women with normal intrauterine development at matching gestational weeks formed the control group. Renal ultrasound parameters, encompassing renal artery peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), time averaged maximum velocity (TAMX), resistive indices (S/D, PI, RI), ratios of renal volume to gestational age (RV/WEEK) and estimated fetal weight (RV/EFW), vascular indices (VI, FI, VFI), were compared between the two groups. All parameters represented the mean values of bilateral kidneys. Result: In the FGR group, fetal renal artery PSV (37.71 +/- 9.93 cm/s), EDV (6.19 +/- 1.50 cm/s), TAMX (15.10 +/- 3.83 cm/s), RV/WEEK (0.45 +/- 0.12), RV/EFW (7.53 +/- 3.24), VI (22.19 +/- 15.00), and VFI (5.53 +/- 3.63) were significantly lower compared to the control group (PSV: 47.11 +/- 11.24 cm/s, EDV: 7.13 +/- 2.00 cm/s, TAMX: 17.85 +/- 3.85 cm/s, RV/WEEK: 0.66 +/- 0.19, RV/EFW:9.20 +/- 3.17, VI: 28.67 +/- 14.72, VFI: 7.40 +/- 3.68). Conversely, fetal renal artery resistive indices (S/D: 9.09 +/- 2.58, PI: 2.71 +/- 0.56, RI: 0.92 +/- 0.04) in the FGR group were notably higher than those in the control group (S/D: 6.22 +/- 1.93, PI: 2.20 +/- 0.73, RI: 0.87 +/- 0.04), with statistical significance (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in renal FI between the FGR group (26.78 +/- 6.59) and the control group (26.89 +/- 5.82) (P > 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed higher diagnostic efficacy for RV/WEEK and RI among individual indicators, while combined parameter application yielded the highest diagnostic efficiency. Conclusion: Utilizing a comprehensive evaluation of fetal kidney ultrasound parameters with multiple indices facilitates early screening and diagnosis of FGR fetuses, thereby aiding clinical decision-making and enhancing newborn birth outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Clinical significance of routine ultrasound screening of fetal growth restriction in third trimester of pregnancy
    Benesova, M.
    Stramska, I
    Svaton, K.
    Chudacek, P.
    CESKA GYNEKOLOGIE-CZECH GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 85 (05): : 302 - 308
  • [42] Screening for fetal growth restriction
    Chauhan, Suneet P.
    Magann, Everett F.
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 49 (02) : 284 - 294
  • [43] Prematurity and fetal growth restriction
    Gardosi, JO
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 81 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [44] Origins of fetal growth restriction
    Robinson, JS
    Moore, VM
    Owens, JA
    McMillen, IC
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2000, 92 (01) : 13 - 19
  • [45] Longitudinal Assessment of Abdominal Circumference versus Estimated Fetal Weight in the Detection of Late Fetal Growth Restriction
    Rahmat Basuki, Tri
    Caradeux, Javier
    Eixarch, Elisenda
    Gratacos, Eduard
    Figueras, Francesc
    FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 2019, 45 (04) : 230 - 237
  • [46] Artificial Intelligence in Fetal Growth Restriction Management: A Narrative Review
    Pierucci, Ugo Maria
    Tonni, Gabriele
    Pelizzo, Gloria
    Paraboschi, Irene
    Werner, Heron
    Ruano, Rodrigo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2025,
  • [47] A Review of Three-dimensional Ultrasound Applications in Fetal Growth Restriction
    Lee, I-Wen
    Chang, Chiung-Hsin
    Cheng, Yueh-Chin
    Ko, Huei-Chen
    Chang, Fong-Ming
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASOUND, 2012, 20 (03) : 142 - 149
  • [48] The Exploration of Fetal Growth Restriction Based on Metabolomics: A Systematic Review
    Yao, Mengxin
    Yang, Zhuoqiao
    Rong, Xin
    Hu, Xuan
    Yao, Na
    Zhu, Manting
    Wang, Xinnan
    Zhu, Xiaoyan
    Yin, Jieyun
    METABOLITES, 2022, 12 (09)
  • [49] Fetal growth restriction as a diagnostic criterion for preeclampsia
    Obata, Soichiro
    Toda, Misaki
    Tochio, Azusa
    Hoshino, Asako
    Miyagi, Etsuko
    Aoki, Shigeru
    PREGNANCY HYPERTENSION-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH, 2020, 21 : 58 - 62
  • [50] Longitudinal maternal hemodynamics in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction
    Stott, D.
    Papastefanou, I.
    Paraschiv, D.
    Clark, K.
    Kametas, N. A.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (06) : 761 - 768