Comprehensive evaluation of fetal renal ultrasound parameters for fetal growth restriction

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Qinxiao [1 ]
Wang, Liang [2 ]
Hu, Mingzi [1 ]
Yang, Sisi [1 ]
Zhang, Wen [1 ]
Chen, Haiying [1 ]
Jiao, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Peoples Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Wenzhou 325000, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Yuying Childrens Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Ultrasound, Wenzhou 325027, Peoples R China
关键词
Fetal growth restriction; Renal ultrasound; Diagnostic efficacy; Multi-parameter evaluation; DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HYPERTENSION; DIAGNOSIS; VELOCITY; HEALTH; VOLUME; ARTERY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36687
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to investigate variances in renal ultrasound parameters between fetuses experiencing fetal growth restriction (FGR) and those with normal intrauterine development, with the intent to offer actionable insights for clinical management. Method: Forty-five pregnant women diagnosed with FGR between 28 and 36 weeks of gestation, who underwent examination at Wenzhou People's Hospital from September 2021 to June 2023, constituted the FGR group. Concurrently, 65 pregnant women with normal intrauterine development at matching gestational weeks formed the control group. Renal ultrasound parameters, encompassing renal artery peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), time averaged maximum velocity (TAMX), resistive indices (S/D, PI, RI), ratios of renal volume to gestational age (RV/WEEK) and estimated fetal weight (RV/EFW), vascular indices (VI, FI, VFI), were compared between the two groups. All parameters represented the mean values of bilateral kidneys. Result: In the FGR group, fetal renal artery PSV (37.71 +/- 9.93 cm/s), EDV (6.19 +/- 1.50 cm/s), TAMX (15.10 +/- 3.83 cm/s), RV/WEEK (0.45 +/- 0.12), RV/EFW (7.53 +/- 3.24), VI (22.19 +/- 15.00), and VFI (5.53 +/- 3.63) were significantly lower compared to the control group (PSV: 47.11 +/- 11.24 cm/s, EDV: 7.13 +/- 2.00 cm/s, TAMX: 17.85 +/- 3.85 cm/s, RV/WEEK: 0.66 +/- 0.19, RV/EFW:9.20 +/- 3.17, VI: 28.67 +/- 14.72, VFI: 7.40 +/- 3.68). Conversely, fetal renal artery resistive indices (S/D: 9.09 +/- 2.58, PI: 2.71 +/- 0.56, RI: 0.92 +/- 0.04) in the FGR group were notably higher than those in the control group (S/D: 6.22 +/- 1.93, PI: 2.20 +/- 0.73, RI: 0.87 +/- 0.04), with statistical significance (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in renal FI between the FGR group (26.78 +/- 6.59) and the control group (26.89 +/- 5.82) (P > 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed higher diagnostic efficacy for RV/WEEK and RI among individual indicators, while combined parameter application yielded the highest diagnostic efficiency. Conclusion: Utilizing a comprehensive evaluation of fetal kidney ultrasound parameters with multiple indices facilitates early screening and diagnosis of FGR fetuses, thereby aiding clinical decision-making and enhancing newborn birth outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Placental pathology in early-onset fetal growth restriction: insights into fetal growth restriction mechanisms
    Bujorescu, Daniela-Loredana
    Ratiu, Adrian Claudiu
    Motoc, Andrei Gheorghe Marius
    Citu, Ioan Cosmin
    Sas, Ioan
    Gorun, Ion Florin
    Gorun, Oana-Maria
    Folescu, Roxana
    Gurgus, Daniela
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF MORPHOLOGY AND EMBRYOLOGY, 2023, 64 (02) : 215 - 224
  • [22] Prediction Model of Late Fetal Growth Restriction with Machine Learning Algorithms
    Lee, Seon Ui
    Choi, Sae Kyung
    Jo, Yun Sung
    Wie, Jeong Ha
    Shin, Jae Eun
    Kim, Yeon Hee
    Kil, Kicheol
    Ko, Hyun Sun
    LIFE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [23] Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge
    Machado Nardozza, Luciano Marcondes
    Rabachini Caetano, Ana Carolina
    Perez Zamarian, Ana Cristina
    Mazzola, Jaqueline Brandao
    Silva, Carolina Pacheco
    Gomes Marcal, Vivian Macedo
    Lobo, Thalita Frutuoso
    Peixoto, Alberto Borges
    Araujo Junior, Edward
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (05) : 1061 - 1077
  • [24] Preeclampsia and late fetal growth restriction
    Marasciulo, Francesco
    Orabona, Rossana
    Fratelli, Nicola
    Fichera, Anna
    Valcamonico, Adriana
    Ferrari, Federico
    Odicino, Franco E.
    Sartori, Enrico
    Prefumo, Federico
    MINERVA OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 73 (04) : 435 - 441
  • [25] An integrated approach to fetal growth restriction
    Figueras, Francesc
    Gratacos, Eduard
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 38 : 48 - 58
  • [26] Fetal Growth Restriction: A Pragmatic Approach
    Nadel, Allan
    Prabhu, Malavika
    Kaimal, Anjali
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024,
  • [27] Placental pathology lesions: International Society for Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology vs Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine fetal growth restriction definitions
    Rodriguez-Sibaja, Maria J.
    Lopez-Diaz, Ana J.
    Valdespino-Vazquez, Maria Y.
    Acevedo-Gallegos, Sandra
    Amaya-Guel, Yubia
    Camarena-Cabrera, Dulce M.
    Lumbreras-Marquez, Mario I.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2024, 6 (08)
  • [28] A Practical Approach to Fetal Growth Restriction
    Copel, Joshua A.
    Bahtiyar, Mert Ozan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 (05) : 1057 - 1069
  • [29] Fetal growth restriction: a modern approach
    Kinzler, Wendy L.
    Vintzileos, Anthony M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 20 (02) : 125 - 131
  • [30] Fetal growth restriction: current knowledge
    Luciano Marcondes Machado Nardozza
    Ana Carolina Rabachini Caetano
    Ana Cristina Perez Zamarian
    Jaqueline Brandão Mazzola
    Carolina Pacheco Silva
    Vivian Macedo Gomes Marçal
    Thalita Frutuoso Lobo
    Alberto Borges Peixoto
    Edward Araujo Júnior
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2017, 295 : 1061 - 1077