Comprehensive evaluation of fetal renal ultrasound parameters for fetal growth restriction

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Qinxiao [1 ]
Wang, Liang [2 ]
Hu, Mingzi [1 ]
Yang, Sisi [1 ]
Zhang, Wen [1 ]
Chen, Haiying [1 ]
Jiao, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Peoples Hosp, Dept Ultrasound, Wenzhou 325000, Peoples R China
[2] Wenzhou Med Univ, Yuying Childrens Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dept Ultrasound, Wenzhou 325027, Peoples R China
关键词
Fetal growth restriction; Renal ultrasound; Diagnostic efficacy; Multi-parameter evaluation; DOPPLER; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HYPERTENSION; DIAGNOSIS; VELOCITY; HEALTH; VOLUME; ARTERY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36687
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aims to investigate variances in renal ultrasound parameters between fetuses experiencing fetal growth restriction (FGR) and those with normal intrauterine development, with the intent to offer actionable insights for clinical management. Method: Forty-five pregnant women diagnosed with FGR between 28 and 36 weeks of gestation, who underwent examination at Wenzhou People's Hospital from September 2021 to June 2023, constituted the FGR group. Concurrently, 65 pregnant women with normal intrauterine development at matching gestational weeks formed the control group. Renal ultrasound parameters, encompassing renal artery peak systolic velocity (PSV), end diastolic velocity (EDV), time averaged maximum velocity (TAMX), resistive indices (S/D, PI, RI), ratios of renal volume to gestational age (RV/WEEK) and estimated fetal weight (RV/EFW), vascular indices (VI, FI, VFI), were compared between the two groups. All parameters represented the mean values of bilateral kidneys. Result: In the FGR group, fetal renal artery PSV (37.71 +/- 9.93 cm/s), EDV (6.19 +/- 1.50 cm/s), TAMX (15.10 +/- 3.83 cm/s), RV/WEEK (0.45 +/- 0.12), RV/EFW (7.53 +/- 3.24), VI (22.19 +/- 15.00), and VFI (5.53 +/- 3.63) were significantly lower compared to the control group (PSV: 47.11 +/- 11.24 cm/s, EDV: 7.13 +/- 2.00 cm/s, TAMX: 17.85 +/- 3.85 cm/s, RV/WEEK: 0.66 +/- 0.19, RV/EFW:9.20 +/- 3.17, VI: 28.67 +/- 14.72, VFI: 7.40 +/- 3.68). Conversely, fetal renal artery resistive indices (S/D: 9.09 +/- 2.58, PI: 2.71 +/- 0.56, RI: 0.92 +/- 0.04) in the FGR group were notably higher than those in the control group (S/D: 6.22 +/- 1.93, PI: 2.20 +/- 0.73, RI: 0.87 +/- 0.04), with statistical significance (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found in renal FI between the FGR group (26.78 +/- 6.59) and the control group (26.89 +/- 5.82) (P > 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed higher diagnostic efficacy for RV/WEEK and RI among individual indicators, while combined parameter application yielded the highest diagnostic efficiency. Conclusion: Utilizing a comprehensive evaluation of fetal kidney ultrasound parameters with multiple indices facilitates early screening and diagnosis of FGR fetuses, thereby aiding clinical decision-making and enhancing newborn birth outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation and Management of Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction
    Bruin, Claartje
    Damhuis, Stefanie
    Gordijn, Sanne
    Ganzevoort, Wessel
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 48 (02) : 371 - 385
  • [2] Fetal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Abnormalities in Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection Associated with and without Fetal Growth Restriction
    Tanimura, Kenji
    Uchida, Akiko
    Uenaka, Mizuki
    Imafuku, Hitomi
    Tairaku, Shinya
    Hashimura, Hiromi
    Ueno, Yoshiko
    Kido, Takumi
    Fujioka, Kazumichi
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (02)
  • [3] Predicting fetal growth restriction with renal volume using 3-D ultrasound: Efficacy evaluation
    Chang, Chiung-Hsin
    Tsai, Pei-Yin
    Yu, Chen-Hsiang
    Ko, Huei-Chen
    Chang, Fong-Ming
    ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2008, 34 (04) : 533 - 537
  • [4] Association of Amniotic Fluid Volume and Fetal Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Parameters in Fetal Growth Restriction
    Sayres, Lauren
    Sahi, Roopjit K.
    Straub, Heather
    Peek, Emma
    Hobbins, John C.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (10) : 1969 - 1978
  • [5] Prediction of fetal growth restriction and small for gestational age by ultrasound cardiac parameters
    Schaak, Ricarda
    Danzer, Moritz Fabian
    Steinhard, Johannes
    Schmitz, Ralf
    Koester, Helen A.
    Moellers, Mareike
    Sondern, Kathleen
    De Santis, Chiara
    Willy, Daniela
    Oelmeier, Kathrin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2024, 300 : 142 - 149
  • [6] Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR)-Fetal Evaluation and Antepartum Intervention
    Ferrazzi, Enrico
    Stampalija, Tamara
    Makarenko, Karina
    Casati, Daniela
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 2 (02): : 112 - 121
  • [7] Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR)—Fetal Evaluation and Antepartum Intervention
    Enrico Ferrazzi
    Tamara Stampalija
    Karina Makarenko
    Daniela Casati
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2013, 2 (2) : 112 - 121
  • [8] The use of ultrasound to assess fetal growth in a guinea pig model of fetal growth restriction
    Swanson, A. M.
    Mehta, V.
    Ofir, K.
    Rowe, M.
    Rossi, C.
    Ginsberg, Y.
    Griffin, H.
    Barker, H.
    White, T.
    Boyd, M.
    David, A. L.
    LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2017, 51 (02) : 181 - 190
  • [9] Comparison between Protocols for Management of Fetal Growth Restriction
    Leal, Caio Ribeiro Vieira
    Rezende, Karen Pereira
    Patricio de Macedo, Evilane do Carmo
    Rezende, Guilherme de Castro
    Correa Jr, Mario Dias
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2023, 45 (02): : 96 - 103
  • [10] The systematic error in the estimation of fetal weight and the underestimation of fetal growth restriction
    Lappen, Justin R.
    Myers, Stephen A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (05) : 477 - 483