An Eye Gaze Heatmap Analysis of Uncertainty Head-Up Display Designs for Conditional Automated Driving

被引:1
作者
Gerber, Michael A. [1 ,2 ]
Schroeter, Ronald [1 ]
Johnson, Daniel [1 ]
Janssen, Christian P. [3 ]
Rakotonirainy, Andry [1 ]
Kuo, Jonny [4 ]
Lenne, Mike G. [4 ]
机构
[1] CARRS Q Queensland Univ Technol, Kelvin Grove, Australia
[2] Msg Syst AG, Munich, Germany
[3] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Seeing Machines Ltd, Canberra, Australia
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYTEMS, CHI 2024 | 2024年
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Conditional Automated Driving; Robot Supervision; Fallback Readiness; Task Switch; Non-Driving Related Activity; Eye-tracking; Driving Simulator Study; Heatmap Analysis; Head Up Display; SITUATION AWARENESS; INTERRUPTION; TAKEOVER; TIME;
D O I
10.1145/3613904.3642219
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper reports results from a high-fidelity driving simulator study (N=215) about a head-up display (HUD) that conveys a conditional automated vehicle's dynamic "uncertainty" about the current situation while fallback drivers watch entertaining videos. We compared (between-group) three design interventions: display (a bar visualisation of uncertainty close to the video), interruption (interrupting the video during uncertain situations), and combination (a combination of both), against a baseline (video-only). We visualised eye-tracking data to conduct a heatmap analysis of the four groups' gaze behaviour over time. We found interruptions initiated a phase during which participants interleaved their attention between monitoring and entertainment. This improved monitoring behaviour was more pronounced in combination compared to interruption, suggesting pre-warning interruptions have positive effects. The same addition had negative effects without interruptions (comparing baseline & display). Intermittent interruptions may have safety benefits over placing additional peripheral displays without compromising usability.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Anderson Christoph, 2018, Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, V2, DOI 10.1145/3214261
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, J3016 SAE
  • [3] Improving the Driver-Automation Interaction: An Approach Using Automation Uncertainty
    Beller, Johannes
    Heesen, Matthias
    Vollrath, Mark
    [J]. HUMAN FACTORS, 2013, 55 (06) : 1130 - 1141
  • [4] Feel the Movement: Real Motion Influences Responses to Take-over Requests in Highly Automated Vehicles
    Borojeni, Shadan Sadeghian
    Boll, Susanne C. J.
    Heuten, Wilko
    Buelthoff, Heinrich H.
    Chuang, Lewis L.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), 2018,
  • [5] Brumby D P., 2019, Rethinking Productivity in Software Engineering, P85, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4842-4221-6_9, 10.1007/978-1-4842-4221-6_9]
  • [6] Endsley M.R., 2016, DESIGNING SITUATION, DOI [10.1201/b11371, DOI 10.1201/B11371]
  • [7] Situation Awareness in Future Autonomous Vehicles: Beware of the Unexpected
    Endsley, Mica R.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL ERGONOMICS ASSOCIATION (IEA 2018), VOL VII: ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, DESIGN FOR ALL, ACTIVITY THEORIES FOR WORK ANALYSIS AND DESIGN, AFFECTIVE DESIGN, 2019, 824 : 303 - 309
  • [8] Endsley MR, 2017, J COGN ENG DECIS MAK, V11, P225, DOI 10.1177/1555343417695197
  • [9] Situation Awareness Misconceptions and Misunderstandings
    Endsley, Mica R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 9 (01) : 4 - 32
  • [10] Finger Richard., 2002, THEOR ISS ERGON SCI, V3, P1, DOI DOI 10.1080/14639220110110324