Responsible investment: Institutional shareholders and ESG performance

被引:3
|
作者
Sun, Yanmei [1 ]
Zhao, Zhuowei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int Business & Econ, China Sch Banking & Finance, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
关键词
ESG; Institutional ownership; Voice; Exit threats; Collusion; Soft activism; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; OWNERSHIP; INVESTORS; GOVERNANCE; INFORMATION; TRANSPARENCY; SENSITIVITY; DISCLOSURE; LIQUIDITY; FORM;
D O I
10.1016/j.pacfin.2024.102357
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the impact of institutional investors on firms' environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance and the possible channels through which this impact occurs. Using a large, balanced set of panel data from 3881 companies in China from 2009 to 2021, we uncover the following significant associations. (i) A positive relationship exists between institutional investors and ESG performance, which holds after considering potential endogeneity problems and conducting a series of robustness tests. (ii) Specifically, institutional investors affect firms' ESG performance by enhancing their ESG strengths, improving their ESG weaknesses, and encouraging them to be more green. (iii) Institutional investors also influence firms' ESG performance positively through voicing and exit threats, although they may have a negative influence in the presence of collusion; however, we find no support for the soft activism mechanism by site visiting. (iv) The positive effect of institutional investors on ESG performance is more pronounced for stable and independent institutional investors, firms whose industries are not heavy polluters, and firms with worse corporate governance than for their counterparts. (v) Finally, financial returns motivate institutional investors to improve firms' ESG performance.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does an Asset Owner's Institutional Setting Influence Its Decision to Sign the Principles for Responsible Investment?
    Hoepner, Andreas G. F.
    Majoch, Arleta A. A.
    Zhou, Xiao Y.
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2021, 168 (02) : 389 - 414
  • [42] Institutional ownership heterogeneity and ESG performance: Evidence from China
    Wang, Yizhi
    Lin, Yongjia
    Fu, Xiaoqing
    Chen, Songhe
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 51
  • [43] Investment horizon and corporate social performance: the virtuous circle of long-term institutional ownership and responsible firm conduct
    Oikonomou, Ioannis
    Yin, Chao
    Zhao, Lei
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2020, 26 (01): : 14 - 40
  • [44] The Drivers of Responsible Investment: The Case of European Pension Funds
    Sievanen, Riikka
    Rita, Hannu
    Scholtens, Bert
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2013, 117 (01) : 137 - 151
  • [45] Busy outside directors and ESG performance
    Cooper, Elizabeth W.
    Uzun, Hatice
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FINANCE & INVESTMENT, 2022,
  • [46] Institutional investment and corporate social performance: aggregated time-Series evidence from an emerging economy
    Ahmed, Sarwar Uddin
    Ahmed, Samiul Parvez
    Karmaker, Uttam
    Mizan, Rooslan
    JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE FINANCE & INVESTMENT, 2022, 12 (03) : 958 - 984
  • [47] From profits to purpose: ESG practices, CEO compensation and institutional ownership
    Nasta, Luigi
    Magnanelli, Barbara Sveva
    Ciaburri, Mirella
    MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2024, 62 (13) : 93 - 115
  • [48] World ESG performance and economic activity
    Angelidis, Timotheos
    Michairinas, Athanasios
    Sakkas, Athanasios
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MARKETS INSTITUTIONS & MONEY, 2024, 93
  • [49] Noncontrolling large shareholders and short-term debt for long-term investment
    Liao, Jia
    Zhan, Yun
    Zheng, Liping
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT & ACCOUNTING, 2025, 36 (01) : 100 - 143
  • [50] Socially responsible investment funds and firm performance improvement
    Tosun, Onur Kemal
    Moon, S. Katie
    REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2024,