Evaluating environmental and economic benefits of using biochar in concrete: A life cycle assessment and multi-criteria decision-making framework

被引:9
作者
Mekky, Khadiga M. [1 ,2 ]
Ibrahim, Mona G. [1 ,3 ]
Sharobim, Kamal [2 ]
Fujii, Manabu [4 ]
Nasr, Mahmoud [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Egypt Japan Univ Sci & Technol E JUST, Environm Engn Dept, Alexandria 21934, Egypt
[2] Suez Canal Univ, Fac Engn, Civil Engn Dept, Ismailia 41511, Egypt
[3] Alexandria Univ, High Inst Publ Hlth, Environm Hlth Dept, Alexandria 21544, Egypt
[4] Tokyo Inst Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Meguro Ku, Tokyo 1528552, Japan
[5] Alexandria Univ, Fac Engn, Sanit Engn Dept, Alexandria 21544, Egypt
关键词
Alum sludge; Cementitious materials; Life cycle assessment; Functional performance; TOPSIS technique; Sustainable concrete; SEWAGE-SLUDGE ASH; CEMENT; SELECTION; IMPACTS; BRICK;
D O I
10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03712
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
While several studies have assessed the applicability of using biochar in cement mortar and concrete preparation based on the best mechanical properties, this evaluation method should be improved to consider the techno-economic feasibility and the environmental impacts. To address this research gap, this study attempts to compare between the conventional concrete with 100 % cement as a control mixture (CM) and dumping of sludge into open sites (scenario_1), and biochar concrete using alum sludge biochar (ASB) as a partial cement replacement (scenario_2), regarding the project life cycle assessment (LCA) and economic feasibility. A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework was used to assign scores to the environmental LCA criteria, material functional performance tests, and cost considerations. The two scenarios were arranged in SimaPro LCA software, and then the different criteria were analyzed using the TOPSIS technique to choose the best alternative. The study demonstrated that the functional properties of the cement mixture containing 5 % of ASB were almost comparable to those of CM, owing to the presence of significant amounts of quartz (SiO2) that bonded strongly with cement molecules. This ASB mixture also enjoyed the least environmental impacts, reducing the global warming potential (GWP) by 32.2 % compared with the CM scenario. The scores of the "Cost" criterion, considering the price of raw materials, energy, production, and maintenance, for the two alternatives were almost comparable, depicting that scenario_2 achieved the highest closeness coefficient of 0.95 in the MCDM overall scoring. This study concluded that biochar could be incorporated into cementitious mixtures due to its lower impact on global warming to maintain a sustainable and economic concrete industrial strategy. Future studies should focus on studying the long-term durability of the biochar-based concrete mixtures and integrating into the MCDM strategy; in addition, determining the correlation between sustainable construction implementation and sustainable development goals achieved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
ACI, 1997, American Concrete Institute Committee 211, Standard practice for selecting proportions for normal, heavyweight, and mass concrete [211.1-91: Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal, Heavyweight
[2]   Characterization of water treatment sludge and its reuse as coagulant [J].
Ahmad, Tarique ;
Ahmad, Kafeel ;
Ahad, Abdul ;
Alam, Mehtab .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2016, 182 :606-611
[3]   Insight into biochar properties and its cost analysis [J].
Ahmed, Mohammad Boshir ;
Zhou, John L. ;
Ngo, Huu Hao ;
Guo, Wenshan .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2016, 84 :76-86
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Egyptian Standard Specification. Testing of Concrete
[5]  
Arukala S., 2020, A qualitative and quantitative approach to prioritize sustainable concrete using TOPSIS Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials, P159, DOI [10.1007/1978, DOI 10.1007/1978]
[6]  
ASTM, 2017, ASTM C494-17
[7]  
ASTM C. & PA, 2003, 618-03 Standard Specification for Fly Ash and Raw Coal or Natural Calcined Puzzolo for Use as A Mineral Admixture in Concrete
[8]  
B. En, 2009, Testing fresh concrete. Slump-test
[9]  
BS, 2001, BS EN 934 part 2: 2001
[10]  
Campos J., 2020, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V479, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/479/1/012025