Inflated energy prices and capital structure: firm level evidence from Indian manufacturing sector

被引:0
|
作者
Dhanda, Mamta [1 ,2 ]
Dhanda, Sunaina [3 ]
Choudhary, Bhawna [1 ]
机构
[1] IILM Univ, IILM Inst Higher Educ, New Delhi, Delhi Ncr, India
[2] Univ Delhi, Inst Eminence, New Delhi, India
[3] Guru Jambheshwar Univ Sci & Technol, CRM Jat Coll, Hisar, India
关键词
Capital structure; Inflation; Manufacturing; India; Energy prices; CORPORATE-FINANCE; AGENCY COSTS; INVESTMENT; SHOCKS; DETERMINANTS; UNCERTAINTY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1108/IJLMA-11-2023-0254
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to study the influence of inflated energy prices on the capital structure of Indian manufacturing corporations and to investigate whether the capital structure of Indian firms is driven by demand shocks or supply shocks during the study period.Design/methodology/approachAfter conducting a thorough review of the capital structure and inflation-based research studies, panel data-based regression model and correlation matrix have been used as statistical tools for Indian manufacturing sector available with the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy Prowess database.FindingsThe results suggest that variables like the presence of inflated energy prices had adversely influenced the capital structure of Indian corporations. Not only this, the study also highlights that factors pertaining to the demand shock had induced Indian corporations to have higher debt levels in the capital structure.Practical implicationsThis study has laid some ground work to explore the influence of inflation on capital structure of Indian firms upon which a more detailed evaluation could be based.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is the first that explores the influence of inflated energy prices on the capital structure of manufacturing firms in India by using the most recent data.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Does firm efficiency matter for debt financing decisions? Evidence from the biggest manufacturing countries
    Legesse, Tenkir Seifu
    Guo, Haifeng
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 23 (01) : 106 - 128
  • [42] Intellectual Capital and Profitability: Evidence from Indian Pharmaceutical Sector
    Gupta, Kanishka
    Goel, Sweta
    Bhatia, Prakash
    VISION-THE JOURNAL OF BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE, 2020, 24 (02) : 204 - 216
  • [43] Capital Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Malaysian Listed Companies
    Salim, Mahfuzah
    Yadav, Raj
    INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON INTERDISCIPLINARY BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 2012 (ICIBSOS 2012), 2012, 65 : 156 - 166
  • [44] Corporate governance, capital structure and firm performance: Evidence from Thailand
    Detthamrong, Umawadee
    Chancharat, Nongnit
    Vithessonthi, Chaiporn
    RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2017, 42 : 689 - 709
  • [45] Corporate tax incentives and capital structure: New evidence from UK firm-level tax returns
    Devereux, Michael P.
    Maffini, Giorgia
    Xing, Jing
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2018, 88 : 250 - 266
  • [46] Capital structure, competitive intensity and firm performance: an analysis of Indian pharmaceutical companies
    Mathur, Neeti
    Tiwari, Satish Chandra
    Ramaiah, T. Sita
    Mathur, Himanshu
    MANAGERIAL FINANCE, 2021, 47 (09) : 1357 - 1382
  • [47] Tariff liberalization and firm-level markups in Indian manufacturing
    Mukherjee, Subhadip
    Chanda, Rupa
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2021, 103
  • [48] Pledging and firm performance: Evidence from Indian firms
    Rajhans, Rajni Kant
    ASIA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2022, 27 (02) : 106 - 114
  • [49] The effects of managerial ability on firm performance and the mediating role of capital structure: evidence from Taiwan
    Ting, Irene Wei Kiong
    Tebourbi, Imen
    Lu, Wen-Min
    Kweh, Qian Long
    FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2021, 7 (01)
  • [50] Exuberance in China's renewable energy investment: Rationality, capital structure and implications with firm level evidence
    Zhang, Dayong
    Cao, Hong
    Zou, Peijiang
    ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 95 : 468 - 478