How Can I Get It Right? Using GPT to Rephrase Incorrect Trainee Responses

被引:3
作者
Lin, Jionghao [1 ]
Han, Zifei [1 ]
Thomas, Danielle R. [1 ]
Gurung, Ashish [1 ]
Gupta, Shivang [1 ]
Aleven, Vincent [1 ]
Koedinger, Kenneth R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Human Comp Interact Inst, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国安德鲁·梅隆基金会;
关键词
Large language models; Feedback; Tutoring training; ChatGPT; GPT-4; FEEDBACK;
D O I
10.1007/s40593-024-00408-y
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
One-on-one tutoring is widely acknowledged as an effective instructional method, conditioned on qualified tutors. However, the high demand for qualified tutors remains a challenge, often necessitating the training of novice tutors (i.e., trainees) to ensure effective tutoring. Research suggests that providing timely explanatory feedback can facilitate the training process for trainees. However, it presents challenges due to the time-consuming nature of assessing trainee performance by human experts. Inspired by the recent advancements of large language models (LLMs), our study employed the GPT-4 model to build an explanatory feedback system. This system identifies trainees' responses in binary form (i.e., correct/incorrect) and automatically provides template-based feedback with responses appropriately rephrased by the GPT-4 model. We conducted our study using the responses of 383 trainees from three training lessons (Giving Effective Praise, Reacting to Errors, and Determining What Students Know). Our findings indicate that: 1) using a few-shot approach, the GPT-4 model effectively identifies correct/incorrect trainees' responses from three training lessons with an average F1 score of 0.84 and AUC score of 0.85; and 2) using the few-shot approach, the GPT-4 model adeptly rephrases incorrect trainees' responses into desired responses, achieving performance comparable to that of human experts.
引用
收藏
页码:482 / 508
页数:27
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Achiam J., 2023, Gpt-4 technical report
  • [2] Immediate Feedback and Opportunity to Revise Answers to Open-Ended Questions
    Attali, Yigal
    Powers, Don
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2010, 70 (01) : 22 - 35
  • [3] Besta M, 2024, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:2308.09687, 10.48550/arXiv.2308.09687]
  • [4] Explanation Feedback Is Better Than Correct Answer Feedback for Promoting Transfer of Learning
    Butler, Andrew C.
    Godbole, Namrata
    Marsh, Elizabeth J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 105 (02) : 290 - 298
  • [5] Cao T., 2019, INT C LEARNING REPR
  • [6] A Computational Model of Context-Dependent Encodings During Category Learning
    Carvalho, Paulo F.
    Goldstone, Robert L.
    [J]. COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2022, 46 (04)
  • [7] Chhabra P., 2022, SOC INFORM TECHNOLO, P1620
  • [8] Can Large Language Models Provide Feedback to Students? A Case Study on ChatGPT
    Dai, Wei
    Lin, Jionghao
    Jin, Hua
    Li, Tongguang
    Tsai, Yi-Shan
    Gasevic, Dragan
    Chen, Guanliang
    [J]. 2023 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, ICALT, 2023, : 323 - 325
  • [9] Can Automated Feedback Improve Teachers' Uptake of Student Ideas? Evidence From a Randomized Controlled Trial in a Large-Scale Online Course
    Demszky, Dorottya
    Liu, Jing
    Hill, Heather C.
    Jurafsky, Dan
    Piech, Chris
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION AND POLICY ANALYSIS, 2024, 46 (03) : 483 - 505
  • [10] The power of feedback
    Hattie, John
    Timperley, Helen
    [J]. REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 77 (01) : 81 - 112