An analysis of optimal equilibrium in the carbon trading market - From a tripartite evolutionary game perspective

被引:5
作者
Fan, Wen-Jing [1 ]
Fang, Yao [2 ]
Jiang, Rui-Bo [3 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou Normal Univ, Econ Sch, Hangzhou 311121, Peoples R China
[2] Agr Dev Bank China, Zhejiang Branch, Hangzhou 310003, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ Water Resources & Elect Power, Econ & Management Sch, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
关键词
Optimal equilibrium; Carbon trading market; Tripartite evolutionary game; CAP; BANKING; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103629
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
As the climate crisis intensifies, achieving the global consensus of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality has become imperative. Carbon trading is an important financial measure to address the environmental crisis, and the realization of the dual-carbon goals requires the cooperation and joint efforts of all parties involved in the carbon emissions trading market. This study constructs a dynamic evolutionary game model involving enterprises, government, and financial institutions while considering consumers' influence. By solving for equilibrium points and conducting numerical simulations, we explore optimal strategy choices for each stakeholder. Our findings reveal that the success of enterprise low-carbon transition is contingent upon market dynamics and requires active cooperation from government, financial institutions, and the public. Furthermore, factors such as financial market efficiency and internal governance capacity significantly impact enterprises' transformation decisions by influencing low-carbon transition costs. Public feedback indirectly affects enterprise decisions through its influence on financial institutions' provision of green services. Additionally, gradual reduction of carbon quotas by government entities facilitates progress toward low-carbon transformation objectives.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Modelling for insight: Does financial development improve environmental quality? [J].
Acheampong, Alex O. .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2019, 83 :156-179
[2]   Designing Climate Mitigation Policy [J].
Aldy, Joseph E. ;
Krupnick, Alan J. ;
Newell, Richard G. ;
Parry, Ian W. H. ;
Pizer, William A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2010, 48 (04) :903-934
[3]   Carbon Emissions Trading and Environmental Protection: International Evidence [J].
Bai, Jennie ;
Rub, Hong .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2024, 70 (07) :4593-4603
[4]   Coevolution of policy, market and technical price risks in the EU ETS [J].
Blyth, William ;
Bunn, Derek .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (08) :4578-4593
[5]   Consignment auctions of free emissions allowances [J].
Burtraw, Dallas ;
McCormack, Kristen .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 107 :337-344
[6]   Profiting from Regulation: Evidence from the European Carbon Market [J].
Bushnell, James B. ;
Chong, Howard ;
Mansur, Erin T. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2013, 5 (04) :78-106
[7]   Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy [J].
Campiglio, Emanuele .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 121 :220-230
[8]  
Cao A., 2011, Low-Carbon Econ, V236, P74
[9]   Achieving environmental sustainability in Africa: The role of financial institutions development on carbon emissions [J].
Chen, George S. ;
Manu, Emmanuel Kwaku ;
Asante, Dennis .
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2023, 31 (05) :3272-3290
[10]  
[陈威 Chen Wei], 2023, [中国管理科学, Chinese Journal of Management Science], V31, P70