Predicting rice phenology across China by integrating crop phenology model and machine learning

被引:12
作者
Zhang, Jinhan [1 ]
Lin, Xiaomao [2 ]
Jiang, Chongya [1 ]
Hu, Xuntao [1 ]
Liu, Bing [1 ]
Liu, Leilei [1 ]
Xiao, Liujun [1 ]
Zhu, Yan [1 ]
Cao, Weixing [1 ]
Tang, Liang [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Minist Educ, Natl Engn & Technol Ctr Informat Agr, Minist Agr,Engn Res Ctr Smart Agr,Jiangsu Collabor, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Kansas State Univ, Throckmorton Plant Sci Ctr 2108, Dept Agron, Manhattan, KS 66506 USA
关键词
Rice; Crop phenology models; Machine learning; Hybrid model; Interpretable machine learning; FED WHEAT YIELD; UNCERTAINTY; SIMULATION; PARAMETERS; IMPACTS; GROWTH; GREECE; ZONES;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175585
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study explores the integration of crop phenology models and machine learning approaches for predicting rice phenology across China, to gain a deeper understanding of rice phenology prediction. Multiple approaches were used to predict heading and maturity dates at 337 locations across the main rice growing regions of China from 1981 to 2020, including crop phenology model, machine learning and hybrid model that integrate both approaches. Furthermore, an interpretable machine learning (IML) using SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) was employed to elucidate influence of climatic and varietal factors on uncertainty in crop phenology model predictions. Overall, the hybrid model demonstrated a high accuracy in predicting rice phenology, followed by machine learning and crop phenology models. The best hybrid model, based on a serial structure and the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, achieved a root mean square error (RMSE) of 4.65 and 5.72 days and coefficient of determination (R2) 2 ) values of 0.93 and 0.9 for heading and maturity predictions, respectively. SHAP analysis revealed temperature to be the most influential climate variable affecting phenology predictions, particularly under extreme temperature conditions, while rainfall and solar radiation were found to be less influential. The analysis also highlighted the variable importance of climate across different phenological stages, rice cultivation patterns, and geographic regions, underscoring the notable regionality. The study proposed that a hybrid model using an IML approach would not only improve the accuracy of prediction but also offer a robust framework for leveraging data-driven in crop modeling, providing a valuable tool for refining and advancing the modeling process in rice.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Predicting fish spawning phenology for adaptive management: Integrating thermal drivers and fishery constraints [J].
Molto, Vicenc ;
Palmer, Miquel ;
Polin, Marco ;
Ospina-Alvarez, Andres ;
Catalan, Ignacio A. .
MARINE ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2024, 202
[32]   Multifactorial Evolutionary Prediction of Phenology and Pests: Can Machine Learning Help? [J].
Jose Lacueva-Perez, Francisco ;
Ilarri, Sergio ;
Barriuso Vargas, Juan Jose ;
Labata Lezaun, Gorka ;
Del Hoyo Alonso, Rafael .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (WEBIST), 2020, :75-82
[33]   Embedded physical constraints in machine learning to enhance vegetation phenology prediction [J].
Cao, Mengying ;
Weng, Qihao .
GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 61 (01)
[34]   A Process-Based Model for Simulating Phasic Developmentand Phenology in Rice [J].
MENG Yali CAO Weixing ZHOU Zhiguo and LIU XinweiNanjing Agricultural UniversityKey Laboratory of Crop Growth Regulation Ministry of Agriculture Nanjing PR China .
Agricultural Sciences in China, 2003, (11) :102-109
[35]   A framework for predicting soft-fruit yields and phenology using embedded, networked microsensors, coupled weather models and machine-learning techniques [J].
Lee, Mark A. ;
Monteiro, Angelo ;
Barclay, Andrew ;
Marcar, Jon ;
Miteva-Neagu, Mirena ;
Parker, Joe .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 168
[36]   Investigating the impact of climate change on crop phenological events in Europe with a phenology model [J].
Ma, Shaoxiu ;
Churkina, Galina ;
Trusilova, Kristina .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2012, 56 (04) :749-763
[37]   Forest Type Differentiation Using GLAD Phenology Metrics, Land Surface Parameters, and Machine Learning [J].
Hartley, Faith M. ;
Maxwell, Aaron E. ;
Landenberger, Rick E. ;
Bortolot, Zachary J. .
GEOGRAPHIES, 2022, 2 (03) :491-515
[38]   Comparison of Climate Reanalysis and Remote-Sensing Data for Predicting Olive Phenology through Machine-Learning Methods [J].
Azpiroz, Izar ;
Oses, Noelia ;
Quartulli, Marco ;
Olaizola, Igor G. ;
Guidotti, Diego ;
Marchi, Susanna .
REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (06)
[39]   Spatiotemporal changes of rice phenology in China under climate change from 1981 to 2010 [J].
Liu, Yujie ;
Zhou, Weimo ;
Ge, Quansheng .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2019, 157 (02) :261-277
[40]   Machine learning methods for efficient and automated in situ monitoring of peach flowering phenology [J].
Zhu, Yihang ;
Chen, Miaojin ;
Gu, Qing ;
Zhao, Yiying ;
Zhang, Xiaobin ;
Sun, Qinan ;
Gu, Xianbin ;
Zheng, Kefeng .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2022, 202