Correlating Evans Index, Callosal Angle, and Lateral Ventricle Volume With Gait Response Outcomes in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Diagnosis

Objective Radiological imaging is pivotal in diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), given the similarity of its symptoms to other neurodegenerative diseases. We aimed to correlate the Evans index (EI), callosal angle (CA), and the volume of the lateral ventricles measured before cerebrospinal fluid removal with the resultant outcomes in gait response. MethodsIn our retrospective study, we identified 42 patients with a diagnosis of iNPH. These patients underwent gait analysis, imaging, and lumbar puncture. Radiological assessments included measurements of CA EI and lateral ventricular volume. Clinically, we assessed the following 4 gait parameters: cadence, gait speed, stride length, and timed up and go. Change in the 4 gait parameters was calculated, normalized, and compiled into a composite score, following which the group was divided into 'responders' and 'nonresponders' based on z score of 0.5. Our dependent variable was clinical improvement in gait, and our independent variables included lateral ventricular volume, EI, and CA. We performed a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare significant responder status using CA, EI, and lateral ventricle volume. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to determine which volume measurement exhibited the strongest correlation with responder status. Determining the significant variables, a chi-square analysis was subsequently conducted. A significance threshold was set at P < 0.05. All our statistical evaluations were conducted in the Spyder environment, which is compatible with Python 3.10. Methods In our retrospective study, we identified 42 patients with a diagnosis of iNPH. These patients underwent gait analysis, imaging, and lumbar puncture. Radiological assessments included measurements of CA EI and lateral ventricular volume. Clinically, we assessed the following 4 gait parameters: cadence, gait speed, stride length, and timed up and go. Change in the 4 gait parameters was calculated, normalized, and compiled into a composite score, following which the group was divided into 'responders' and 'nonresponders' based on z score of 0.5. Our dependent variable was clinical improvement in gait, and our independent variables included lateral ventricular volume, EI, and CA. We performed a Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare significant responder status using CA, EI, and lateral ventricle volume. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was employed to determine which volume measurement exhibited the strongest correlation with responder status. Determining the significant variables, a chi-square analysis was subsequently conducted. A significance threshold was set at P < 0.05. All our statistical evaluations were conducted in the Spyder environment, which is compatible with Python 3.10. Results There was a significant difference for responder status in EI and lateral ventricle volume. Evan index showing a statistic of 2.202 (P value = 0.02) and lateral ventricle volume demonstrating a statistic of 2.086 (P value = 0.03). Subsequent exploration using receiver operating characteristic analysis, with area under the curve of 0.71, identified 105.40 cm3 as the most robustly correlated volume threshold with responder status. Conclusions The lateral ventricular volume demonstrates a stronger correlation with gait improvement compared to the CA or EI. These observations indicate that evaluating the lateral ventricle volume before lumbar puncture could serve as a predictor for gait response after lumbar puncture in individuals with normal pressure hydrocephalus.