Bimodal imaging: Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer is higher in MRI lesions visible to transrectal ultrasound

被引:0
作者
Falkenbach, Fabian [1 ]
Ahmad-Sterkau, Fatima [1 ]
Kachanov, Mykyta [1 ,2 ]
Beyersdorff, Dirk [3 ]
Koehler, Daniel [3 ]
Ambrosini, Francesca [1 ,4 ]
Ortner, Gernot [1 ]
Maurer, Tobias [1 ,5 ]
Graefen, Markus [1 ]
Budaeus, Lars [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Martini Klin Prostate Canc Ctr, Martinistr 52, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Inst Human Genet, Hamburg, Germany
[3] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Diagnost & Intervent Radiol & Nucl Med, Hamburg, Germany
[4] IRCCS Osped Policlin San Martino, Genoa, Italy
[5] Univ Med Ctr Hamburg Eppendorf, Dept Urol, Hamburg, Germany
关键词
MRI; systematic biopsy; targeted biopsy; transrectal ultrasound; FUSION; VISIBILITY;
D O I
10.1002/pros.24785
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: To explore the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa; ISUP >= 2) in patients with a single MRI lesion that is visible or invisible on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) during biopsy. Methods: Retrospective analyses of patients who underwent targeted and systematic biopsy of the prostate for one MRI-visible lesion (PI-RADS score >= 3) between 2017 and 2022. TRUS-visibility, PI-RADS score, and clinical parameters were recorded prospectively. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of csPCa. Results: 277 consecutive patients with one MRI-visible lesion were identified. A correlating lesion on TRUS was present in 147/277 (53%). The median age, PSA level, and prostate volume were 68.0 years (IQR: 62.0-73.0), 7.3 ng/ml (IQR: 5.4-10.8) and 45.0 cc (IQR: 32.0-68.0), respectively. Baseline parameters were not significantly different between the two groups. CsPCa was detected in 59/130 (45%) without and in 102/147 (69%) patients with a corresponding TRUS lesion. In multivariable logistic regression analysis predicting csPCa, TRUS-visibility (OR: 2.13, CI: 1.14-4.03, p = 0.02) and PI-RADS score (PI-RADS 4: OR: 7.28, CI: 3.33-17.19; PI-RADS 5: OR: 13.39, CI: 5.27-36.83, p < 0.001) achieved independent predictor status. Conclusions: Bimodal-visible lesions more often harbored csPCa and were easier to target. TRUS-visibility of MRI lesions is an independent predictor of csPCa. Therefore, education in both modalities is essential. Despite MRI, the ultrasound should still be diligently examined.
引用
收藏
页码:1448 / 1455
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Beemsterboer PMM, 1999, INT J CANCER, V84, P437, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990820)84:4<437::AID-IJC19>3.3.CO
  • [2] 2-J
  • [3] Prostate cancer detection rate according to lesion visibility using ultrasound and MRI
    Choi, M. H.
    Lee, Y. J.
    Jung, S. E.
    Lee, J. Y.
    Choi, Y-J
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 74 (06) : 474 - 479
  • [4] Ferriero M, 2022, WORLD J UROL, V40, P991, DOI 10.1007/s00345-021-03921-0
  • [5] Vector Prostate Biopsy: A Novel Magnetic Resonance Imaging/ Ultrasound Image Fusion Transperineal Biopsy Technique Using Electromagnetic Needle Tracking Under Local Anaesthesia
    Fletcher, Peter
    De Santis, Marta
    Ippoliti, Simona
    Orecchia, Luca
    Charlesworth, Philip
    Kastner, Christof
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2023, 83 (03) : 249 - 256
  • [6] Impact of Lesion Visibility on Transrectal Ultrasound on the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (Gleason Score 3+4 or Greater) with Transrectal Ultrasound-Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Biopsy
    Garcia-Reyes, Kirema
    Nguyen, Hao G.
    Zagoria, Ronald J.
    Shinohara, Katsuto
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Behr, Spencer C.
    Westphalen, Antonio C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (03) : 699 - 705
  • [7] Impact of Surgeon's Experience in Rigid versus Elastic MRI/TRUS-Fusion Biopsy to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer Using Targeted and Systematic Cores
    Goertz, Magdalena
    Nyarangi-Dix, Joanne Nyaboe
    Pursche, Lars
    Schuetz, Viktoria
    Reimold, Philipp
    Schwab, Constantin
    Stenzinger, Albrecht
    Sueltmann, Holger
    Duensing, Stefan
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Bonekamp, David
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (04)
  • [8] MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis
    Kasivisvanathan, V
    Rannikko, A. S.
    Borghi, M.
    Panebianco, V
    Mynderse, L. A.
    Vaarala, M. H.
    Briganti, A.
    Budaus, L.
    Hellawell, G.
    Hindley, R. G.
    Roobol, M. J.
    Eggener, S.
    Ghei, M.
    Villers, A.
    Bladou, F.
    Villeirs, G. M.
    Virdi, J.
    Boxler, S.
    Robert, G.
    Singh, P. B.
    Venderink, W.
    Hadaschik, B. A.
    Ruffion, A.
    Hu, J. C.
    Margolis, D.
    Crouzet, S.
    Klotz, L.
    Taneja, S. S.
    Pinto, P.
    Gill, I
    Allen, C.
    Giganti, F.
    Freeman, A.
    Morris, S.
    Punwani, S.
    Williams, N. R.
    Brew-Graves, C.
    Deeks, J.
    Takwoingi, Y.
    Emberton, M.
    Moore, C. M.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (19) : 1767 - 1777
  • [9] Mottet N, 2023, EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer
  • [10] Imaging clinically localized prostate cancer
    Purohit, RS
    Shinohara, K
    Meng, MV
    Carroll, PR
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 30 (02) : 279 - +