Bovine Mineral Grafting Affects the Hydrophilicity of Dental Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Study

被引:1
作者
Newman, Allyson [1 ]
Anderson, Nina K. [2 ]
Romanos, Georgios E. [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Periodont & Endodont, Lab Periodontal, Implant,Phototherapy, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Oral Biol & Pathol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
dental implants; hydrophilicity; niobium; titanium; wettability; xenogenic bone graft; zirconia; WETTABILITY;
D O I
10.3390/ma17164052
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Wettability is recognized as an important property of implant surfaces for ensuring improved biological responses. However, limited information exists on how bone grafting procedures including materials influence the hydrophilic behavior of implant surfaces. This in vitro study aimed to investigate the influence of two bovine grafting materials after hydration on the wettability of four different disk surfaces: commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti), titanium-zirconium dioxide (TiZrO2-Cerid (R)), zirconia (SDS (R)), and niobium. Wettability tests were performed on each of the four implant surfaces with a solution of 0.9% sodium chloride after mixture with W-boneTM (Group A) or Bio-Oss (R) (Group B) or 0.9% sodium chloride alone (Group C). In total, 360 contact angle measurements were completed with n = 30 per group. Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way analysis with variance (ANOVA) test with a significant mean difference at the 0.05 level. For pure titanium, Group A demonstrated increased hydrophilicity compared to Group B. Both TiZrO2 and zirconia showed significant differences for Groups A, B and C, exhibiting a decrease in hydrophilicity after the use of bovine grafting materials compared to titanium surfaces. Niobium remained consistently hydrophobic. In summary, this study revealed that bovine grafting materials may diminish the hydrophilicity of zirconia surfaces and exert varied effects on titanium and niobium. These findings contribute to the understanding of implant surface interactions with grafting materials, offering insights for optimizing biological responses in implantology.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] State of the art of oral implants
    Albrektsson, Tomas
    sennerby, Lars
    Wennerberg, Ann
    [J]. PERIODONTOLOGY 2000, 2008, 47 : 15 - 26
  • [2] Alcoforado G A, 1991, J Parodontol, V10, P11
  • [3] Comparison of Bone Regeneration between Porcine-Derived and Bovine-Derived Xenografts in Rat Calvarial Defects: A Non-Inferiority Study
    Bae, Eun-Bin
    Kim, Ha-Jin
    Ahn, Jong-Ju
    Bae, Hyun-Young
    Kim, Hyung-Joon
    Huh, Jung-Bo
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (20)
  • [4] BRANEMARK P I, 1969, Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, V3, P81
  • [5] A POWER PRIMER
    COHEN, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [6] de Carvalho Moreira A., 2019, BRAZ DENT SCI, V22, P147, DOI DOI 10.14295/BDS.2019.V22I2.1691
  • [7] Current Findings Regarding Zirconia Implants
    Depprich, Rita
    Naujoks, Christian
    Ommerborn, Michelle
    Schwarz, Frank
    Kuebler, Norbert R.
    Handschel, Joerg
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (01) : 124 - 137
  • [8] Huda A., 2018, Masters Thesis
  • [9] Kim I-H, 2015, WETTING WETTABILITY, P253
  • [10] The effect of zirconia and titanium surfaces on biofilm formation and on host-derived immunological parameters
    Kniha, K.
    Heussen, N.
    Modabber, A.
    Hoelzle, F.
    Moehlhenrich, S. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (10) : 1361 - 1374