Estimation of the elastic modulus of basaltic rocks using machine learning methods

被引:6
作者
Yesiloglu-Gultekin, Nurgul [1 ]
Dogan, Ayhan [2 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Baskent Chamber Ind Organized Ind Zone Vocat Sch, Dept Construct, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Baskent Chamber Ind Organized Ind Zone Vocat Sch, Dept Comp Technol, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Basalt; Support vector machine; Gaussian process regression; Ensembles of tree; Regression trees; UNIAXIAL COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; DEFORMATION MODULUS; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; NEURAL-NETWORKS; DECISION TREES; RANDOM FORESTS; PREDICTION; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12145-024-01472-7
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The elastic modulus of basalt is a significant engineering parameter required for many projects. Therefore, a total of 137 datasets of basalts from Digor-Kilittasi, Turkey, were used to predict the elastic modulus of intact rock (Ei) for this study. P wave velocity, S wave velocity, apparent porosity, and dry density parameters were employed as input parameters. In order to predict Ei, seven different models with two or three inputs were constructed, employing four different machine learning methods such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Ensembles of Tree (ET), and Regression Trees (RT). The performance of datasets, models, and methods was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE), Mean Squared Error (MSE), and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). This study presented and analyzed the performance of four machine learning methods. A ranking approach was employed to determine the best performing method and dataset. Based on these evaluations, all four machine learning techniques effectively estimate the value of Ei. While they can be used as an appropriate choice for estimating the elastic modulus of basaltic rocks, the ET approach appears to be the most successful method. However, the performance of the GPR is the worst according to model assessments. The average R-2 values for Model 1 through 7 of the ET method for the five test datasets are 0.97, 0.93, 0.89, 0.97, 0.91, 0.99, and 0.99, respectively. The the average R2 values for GPR from Models 1 to 7 for the five test datasets are 0.73, 0.55, 0.69, 0.48, 0.47, 0.73, 0.56, respectively. An additional indication that the ET performed better than all the other methods was the Taylor diagram, which made it simple to determine how well the model predictions matched the observations. Furthermore, these findings validate the performance of the machine learning techniques employed in this study as valuable instruments for future investigations into the modeling of complex engineering issues. The results of this study suggest that machine learning algorithms can help reduce the need for high-quality core samples and labor-intensive procedures in predicting the elastic modulus of basaltic rocks, resulting in time and cost savings.
引用
收藏
页码:5941 / 5966
页数:26
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]   Models to estimate the elastic modulus of weak rocks based on least square support vector machine [J].
Acar, Mehmet Cemal ;
Kaya, Bulent .
ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2020, 13 (14)
[2]  
Aktimur H, 1991, 9257 MTA MIN RES EXP
[3]   Empirical estimation of rock mass deformation modulus of rocks: comparison of intact rock properties and rock mass classifications as inputs [J].
Adeyemi Emman Aladejare ;
Toochukwu Malachi Ozoji ;
Musa Adebayo Idris ;
Abiodun Ismail Lawal ;
Moshood Onifade .
Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (11)
[4]   Empirical Estimation of Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rock: Database of Simple, Multiple, and Artificial Intelligence-Based Regressions [J].
Aladejare, Adeyemi Emman ;
Alofe, Emmanuel Damola ;
Onifade, Moshood ;
Lawal, Abiodun Ismail ;
Ozoji, Toochukwu Malachi ;
Zhang, Zong-Xian .
GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 39 (06) :4427-4455
[5]   A proficient approach to forecast COVID-19 spread via optimized dynamic machine learning models [J].
Alali, Yasminah ;
Harrou, Fouzi ;
Sun, Ying .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
[6]   Assessing the uniaxial compressive strength and tangent Young's modulus of basalt rock using the Leeb rebound hardness test [J].
Aldeeky, H. ;
Al Hattamleh, O. ;
Rababah, S. .
MATERIALES DE CONSTRUCCION, 2020, 70 (340)
[7]   Prediction of Engineering Properties of Basalt Rock in Jordan Using Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test [J].
Aldeeky H. ;
Al Hattamleh O. .
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2018, 36 (06) :3511-3525
[8]   Modeling deformation modulus of a stratified sedimentary rock mass using neural network, fuzzy inference and genetic programming [J].
Alemdag, S. ;
Gurocak, Z. ;
Cevik, A. ;
Cabalar, A. F. ;
Gokceoglu, C. .
ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2016, 203 :70-82
[9]   On-line WSN SoC estimation using Gaussian Process Regression: An Adaptive Machine Learning Approach [J].
Ali, Omer ;
Ishak, Mohamad Khairi ;
Ahmed, Ashraf Bani ;
Salleh, Mohd Fadzli Mohd ;
Ooi, Chia Ai ;
Khan, Muhammad Firdaus Akbar Jalaludin ;
Khan, Imran .
ALEXANDRIA ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2022, 61 (12) :9831-9848
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Google Earth