Feed efficiency and enteric methane emissions indices are inconsistent with the outcomes of the rumen microbiome composition

被引:0
|
作者
Fregulia, Priscila [1 ,2 ]
Campos, Mariana Magalhaes [3 ]
Dhakal, Rajan [4 ]
Dias, Roberto Junio Pedroso [1 ,2 ]
Neves, Andre Luis Alves [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Juiz Fora, Lab Protozool, Inst Ciencias Biol, BR-36036900 Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Juiz de Fora, Programa Posgrad Biodiversidade & Conservacao Nat, Inst Ciencias Biol, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
[3] Brazilian Agr Res Corp, Empresa Brasileira Pesquisa Agr, EMBRAPA, Natl Ctr Res Dairy Cattle, Juiz de Fora, Brazil
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Fac Hlth & Med Sci, Dept Vet & Anim Sci, Gronnegardsvej 3, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
关键词
Feed efficiency; Enteric methane emission; Rumen microbiota; bacteria; archaea; protozoa; GENETIC-PARAMETERS; DAIRY; PERFORMANCE; COWS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175263
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The correlation between enteric methane emissions (eME) and feed efficiency (FE) in cattle is linked to the anaerobic fermentation of feedstuffs that occurs in the rumen. Several mathematical indices have been developed to predict feed efficiency and identify low methane emitters in herds. To investigate this, the current study aimed to evaluate the rumen microbial composition in the same group of animals ranked according to six different indices (three indices for FE and three for eME). Thirty-three heifers were ranked into three groups, each consisting of 11 animals, based on FE (feed conversion efficiency- FCE, residual weight gain- RG, and residual feed intake- RFI) and eME indices (production, yield, and intensity). Rumen fluids were collected using a stomach tube and analyzed using 16S rRNA and 18S rRNA, targeting rumen bacteria, archaea, and protozoa. The sequencing analysis revealed that the presence of unique microbial species in the rumen varies across animals ranked by the FE and eME indices. The High RG group harbored 17 unique prokaryotic taxa, while the High FCE group contained only seven. Significant differences existed in the microbial profiles of the animals based on the FE and eME indices. For instance, Raoultibacter was more abundant in the Intermediate RFI group but less so in the Intermediate RG and Intermediate FCE groups. The abundance of Entodinium was higher while Diplodinium was lower in the High FCE group, in contrast to the High RG and High RFI groups. Methanobrevibacter exhibited similar abundances across eME indices. However, the heifers did not demonstrate the same production, yield, and intensity of eME. The present findings underscore the importance of standardizing the FE and eME indices. This standardization is crucial for ensuring consistent and reliable assessments of the composition and function of the rumen microbiome across different herds.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Nitrate but not tea saponin feed additives decreased enteric methane emissions in nonlactating cows
    Guyader, J.
    Eugene, M.
    Doreau, M.
    Morgavi, D. P.
    Gerard, C.
    Loncke, C.
    Martin, C.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (11) : 5367 - 5377
  • [32] Yak rumen microbiome elevates fiber degradation ability and alters rumen fermentation pattern to increase feed efficiency
    Zhao, Congcong
    Wang, Lamei
    Ke, Shanlin
    Chen, Xinhua
    Kenez, Akos
    Xu, Wei
    Wang, Dangdang
    Zhang, Fan
    Li, Yong
    Cui, Zhanhong
    Qiao, Yu
    Wang, Jing
    Sun, Wenjuan
    Zhao, Jianhua
    Yao, Junhu
    Yu, Zhongtang
    Cao, Yangchun
    ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2022, 11 : 201 - 214
  • [33] Yak rumen microbiome elevates fiber degradation ability and alters rumen fermentation pattern to increase feed efficiency
    Zhao, Congcong
    Wang, Lamei
    Ke, Shanlin
    Chen, Xinhua
    Kenez, Akos
    Xu, Wei
    Wang, Dangdang
    Zhang, Fan
    Li, Yong
    Cui, Zhanhong
    Qiao, Yu
    Wang, Jing
    Sun, Wenjuan
    Zhao, Jianhua
    Yao, Junhu
    Yu, Zhongtang
    Cao, Yangchun
    ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2022, 11 : 201 - 214
  • [34] Yak rumen microbiome elevates fiber degradation ability and alters rumen fermentation pattern to increase feed efficiency
    Congcong Zhao
    Lamei Wang
    Shanlin Ke
    Xinhua Chen
    A kos Kene z
    Wei Xu
    Dangdang Wang
    Fan Zhang
    Yong Li
    Zhanhong Cui
    Yu Qiao
    Jing Wang
    Wenjuan Sun
    Jianhua Zhao
    Junhu Yao
    Zhongtang Yu
    Yangchun Cao
    Animal Nutrition , 2022, (04) : 201 - 214
  • [35] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IN VIVO RUMEN GAS COMPOSITION AND FEED EFFICIENCY OF CALVES
    MILTIMORE, JE
    MCARTHUR, JM
    NATURE, 1962, 196 (4851) : 288 - &
  • [36] Changing of the composition of the rumen microflora to improve the efficiency of feed use by ruminants
    Duskaev, G. K.
    Nurzhanov, B. S.
    Rysaev, A. F.
    Rahmatulin, Sh G.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WORLD TECHNOLOGICAL TRENDS IN AGRIBUSINESS, 2021, 624
  • [37] Relationship between the rumen microbiome and liver transcriptome in beef cattle divergent for feed efficiency
    Keogh, Kate
    Kenny, David A.
    Alexandre, Pamela A.
    Waters, Sinead M.
    McGovern, Emily
    McGee, Mark
    Reverter, Antonio
    ANIMAL MICROBIOME, 2024, 6 (01)
  • [38] Lowering ruminant methane emissions through improved feed conversion efficiency
    Waghorn, G. C.
    Hegarty, R. S.
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 : 291 - 301
  • [39] Diet composition at weaning affects the rumen microbial population and methane emissions by lambs
    Yanez-Ruiz, D. R.
    Hart, K. J.
    Martin-Garcia, A. I.
    Ramos, S.
    Newbold, C. J.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2008, 48 (1-2) : 186 - 188
  • [40] Meta-Analysis of Dietary Supplementation with Seaweed in Dairy Cows: Milk Yield and Composition, Nutrient Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation, and Enteric Methane Emissions
    Orzuna-Orzuna, Jose Felipe
    Lara-Bueno, Alejandro
    Mendoza-Martinez, German David
    Miranda-Romero, Luis Alberto
    Silva, Gabriela Vazquez
    de la Torre-Hernandez, Maria Eugenia
    Sanchez-Lopez, Nallely
    Hernandez-Garcia, Pedro Abel
    DAIRY, 2024, 5 (03) : 464 - 479