A Consecutive Series of Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Contemporary Monoblock Versus Modular Revision Stems: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

被引:1
作者
Siljander, Breana R. [1 ]
Chandi, Sonia K. [1 ]
Coxe, Francesca R. [1 ]
Nguyen, Joseph T. [1 ]
Sculco, Peter K. [1 ]
Chalmers, Brian P. [1 ]
Bostrom, Mathias P. [1 ]
Gausden, Elizabeth B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
total hip arthroplasty; modular stem; monoblock stem; revision; periprosthetic femur fracture; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; FLUTED TITANIUM STEMS; FEMORAL REVISION; TAPERED STEMS; DISTAL FIXATION; SHORT-TERM; SUBSIDENCE; DIFFERENCE; MANAGEMENT; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.046
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems are the implant design of choice for managing Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femur fractures (PFFs), producing reliable results over the past few decades. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of Vancouver B2 PFFs treated with contemporary monoblock versus modular TFTs. Methods: A consecutive series of 113 patients ( 72 women, 64%, mean age 70 years [range, 26 to 96]) who had a B2 PFF were treated with either a monoblock (n = 42) or modular (n = 71) TFT stem between 2008 and 2021. The mean body mass index was 30 +/- 7. The mean follow-up was 2.9 years. A radiographic review was performed to assess leg length and offset restoration, endosteal cortical contact length, and stem subsidence. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine survivorship without revision, reoperation, or dislocation. Results: There was no difference in the restoration of leg length (0.3 +/- 8.0 mm) or offset (2.8 +/- 8.2 mm) between the monoblock and modular cohorts (P > .05). Mean endosteal cortical contact length (47.2 +/- 26.6 versus 46.7 +/- 2 6.4 mm, P 1/4 .89) and stem subsidence (2.7 +/- 3.5 versus 2.4 +/- 3.2 mm, P 1/4 .66) did not differ. No difference in patient-reported outcome measures (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement; Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical and Mental; visual analog score; and Lower Extremity Activity Scale) between the groups was observed. Survivorship at 2 years free from reoperation, revision, and dislocation was 90.4, 90.3, and 97.6%, respectively, for the monoblock cohort; and 84.0, 86.9, and 90.0%, respectively, for the modular cohort. Conclusions: No significant differences in radiographic or clinical outcomes were observed between patients treated with monoblock or modular TFTs in this large series of B2 PFFs. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S213 / S219
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [31] Locking compression plate versus revision-prosthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty
    Joestl, Julian
    Hofbauer, Marcus
    Lang, Nikolaus
    Tiefenboeck, Thomas
    Hajdu, Stefan
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (04): : 939 - 943
  • [32] Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using a modular cementless stem without allografting
    Neumann, Daniel
    Thaler, Christoph
    Dorn, Ulrich
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2012, 36 (05) : 1045 - 1050
  • [33] REVISION ARTHROPLASTY VERSUS OPEN REDUCTION AND INTERNAL FIXATION OF VANCOUVER TYPE-B2 AND B3 PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES
    Haider, Thomas
    Hanna, Philip
    Mohamadi, Amin
    Merchan, Nelson
    McNichol, Megan
    Wixted, John J.
    Appleton, Paul T.
    Nazarian, Ara
    von Keudell, Arvind G.
    Rodriguez, Edward K.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [34] Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures treated by ORIF. Mid to long-term follow- up study in 28 patients
    De Maio, F.
    Caterini, A.
    Cesaretti, L.
    Ziranu, A.
    De Luna, V
    Farsetti, P.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 26 : 1 - 8
  • [35] Long stem revision versus short stem revision with plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture: a comparative study of eighty five cases
    Chen, Jian-Jiun
    Hung, Shih-Hsin
    Liou, Jia-You
    Chang, Wen-Chieh
    Hsu, Kuei-Hsiang
    Su, Yu-Pin
    Chiu, Fang-Yao
    Cheng, Ming-Fai
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 48 (08) : 1997 - 2005
  • [36] Open reduction and internal fixation might be a valuable alternative to stem revision in Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fractures, irrespective of the stem's design
    Flury, Andreas
    Hasler, Julian
    Pagenstert, Geert
    Dimitriou, Dimitris
    Helmy, Naeder
    Finsterwald, Michael
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2021, 141 (05) : 871 - 878
  • [37] Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Vancouver Type B2: Revision Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation With Locking Compression Plate
    Baum, C.
    Leimbacher, M.
    Kriechling, P.
    Platz, A.
    Cadosch, D.
    GERIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2019, 10
  • [38] Tapered fluted modular titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 peri-prosthetic fractures
    Munro, J. T.
    Masri, B. A.
    Garbuz, D. S.
    Duncan, C. P.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2013, 95B (11) : 17 - 20
  • [39] Is Stem Revision Necessary for Vancouver B2 Periprosthetic Hip Fractures? Analysis of Osteosynthesis Results from 39 Cases
    Gonzalez-Martin, David
    Gonzalez-Casamayor, Sergio
    Herrera-Perez, Mario
    Guerra-Ferraz, Ayron
    Ojeda-Jimenez, Jorge
    Pais-Brito, Jose Luis
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (22)
  • [40] Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Is a Feasible Alternative to Femoral Revision Arthroplasty in Geriatric Patients with Vancouver B2/3 Type Periprosthetic Fractures: A Study Analyzing In-Hospital Outcomes
    Lampert, Christopher
    Linhart, Christoph
    Holzapfel, Boris Michael
    Boecker, Wolfgang
    Neuerburg, Carl
    Zhang, Yunjie
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (21)