A Comparative Study between Single-Level Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease

被引:0
|
作者
Chang, Chung-Tse [1 ]
Lin, Yu-Hsien [1 ]
Wu, Yun-Che [1 ]
Shih, Cheng-Min [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Kun-Hui [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Pan, Chien-Chou [1 ,5 ]
Lee, Cheng-Hung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
[2] Hungkuang Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
[3] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Coll Med, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
[4] Hungkuang Univ, Coll Intelligent Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
[5] Jenteh Jr Coll Med Nursing & Management, Dept Rehabil Sci, Miaoli 35664, Taiwan
关键词
lumbar spine; adjacent segment disease (ASD); oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF); transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF); COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13195843
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Various surgical approaches have been proposed for treating adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion. However, studies using oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) to treat ASD are lacking. The current study assessed the postoperative outcomes of single-level OLIF for ASD, comparing the results with those for patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Methods: Patients who underwent single-level OLIF or TLIF for lumbar ASD were retrospectively included. Clinical outcomes, that is, the results of assessments using the Euroqol 5-Dimension quality of life scale (EQ-5D), the Oswestry Disability Index, and the visual analog scale, were evaluated. Radiologic parameters, including disc height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), segmental coronal angle (SCA), lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, were also assessed. Results: A total of 65 patients were enrolled: 32 in the OLIF group and 33 in the TLIF group. The median follow-up time was 24.0 months in both groups. The clinical outcomes and radiologic parameters significantly improved in both groups postoperatively. According to intergroup comparisons, the OLIF group had significantly less blood loss and superior improvement in radiologic parameters (DH, SL, and SCA) whereas the TLIF group had significantly shorter operation times. For the OLIF patients who did not undergo posterior decompression, the operation time was similar to that of the TLIF group, but the surgical blood loss and length of hospital stay were significantly reduced compared with the TLIF group. Conclusions: Compared with TLIF, OLIF provides similar clinical outcomes, leads to less surgical blood loss, and has superior radiologic parameters; however, the operation time is significantly longer. OLIF without posterior decompression may be a superior option to TLIF for certain patients.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The Research on Spinopelvic Parameters and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of
    Yang, Pengchao
    Dong, Yimin
    Xu, Yong
    Kang, Honglei
    Li, Feng
    Guan, Hanfeng
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 190 : E841 - E850
  • [42] Response to: Is Older Age a Contraindication for Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Patel, Jwalant Y.
    Kundnani, Vishal G.
    Chawada, Bansari
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (06) : 885 - 886
  • [43] In Single-Level, Open, Posterior Lumbar Fusion, Does Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Posterolateral Fusion Lead to Better Outcomes?
    Chanbour, Hani
    Steinle, Anthony M.
    Tang, Alan R.
    Gardocki, Raymond J.
    Abtahi, Amir M.
    Stephens, Byron F.
    Zuckerman, Scott L.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 92 (01) : 110 - 117
  • [44] Fusion rate and complications of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysis
    Xiao, Xun
    Duan, Heng
    Pan, Xin
    Zhao, Hua
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [45] Surgery for degenerative lumbar disease: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Grob, Dieter
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2009, 18 (12) : 1991 - 1992
  • [46] Surgery for degenerative lumbar disease: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Dieter Grob
    European Spine Journal, 2009, 18 : 1991 - 1992
  • [47] Predictors of Spontaneous Restoration of Lumbar Lordosis after Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Ohyama, Shuhei
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Inoue, Masahiro
    Nakajima, Takayuki
    Sato, Yusuke
    Watanabe, Atsuya
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Kubota, Go
    Nakajima, Arata
    Saito, Junya
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Orita, Sumihisa
    Nakagawa, Koichi
    Ohtori, Seiji
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (06): : 397 - 404
  • [48] Effect of Lumbar Lordosis on the Adjacent Segment in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis
    Zhao, Xin
    Du, Lin
    Xie, Youzhuan
    Zhao, Jie
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 114 : E114 - E120
  • [49] Comparison of midline lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar degeneration disease
    Zhang, Xuelei
    Zhang, Yu
    Gu, Zuchao
    Li, Guo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [50] Effect of Approach Based Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters and Functional Outcomes: Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Jain, Mantu
    Sethy, Siddharth S.
    Sahoo, Auroshish
    Khan, Shahnawaz
    Tripathy, Sujit
    Ramasubbu, Mathan Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 59 (01) : 40 - 46