A Comparative Study between Single-Level Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease

被引:0
作者
Chang, Chung-Tse [1 ]
Lin, Yu-Hsien [1 ]
Wu, Yun-Che [1 ]
Shih, Cheng-Min [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Kun-Hui [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Pan, Chien-Chou [1 ,5 ]
Lee, Cheng-Hung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
[2] Hungkuang Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
[3] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Coll Med, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
[4] Hungkuang Univ, Coll Intelligent Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
[5] Jenteh Jr Coll Med Nursing & Management, Dept Rehabil Sci, Miaoli 35664, Taiwan
关键词
lumbar spine; adjacent segment disease (ASD); oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF); transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF); COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13195843
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Various surgical approaches have been proposed for treating adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion. However, studies using oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) to treat ASD are lacking. The current study assessed the postoperative outcomes of single-level OLIF for ASD, comparing the results with those for patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Methods: Patients who underwent single-level OLIF or TLIF for lumbar ASD were retrospectively included. Clinical outcomes, that is, the results of assessments using the Euroqol 5-Dimension quality of life scale (EQ-5D), the Oswestry Disability Index, and the visual analog scale, were evaluated. Radiologic parameters, including disc height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), segmental coronal angle (SCA), lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, were also assessed. Results: A total of 65 patients were enrolled: 32 in the OLIF group and 33 in the TLIF group. The median follow-up time was 24.0 months in both groups. The clinical outcomes and radiologic parameters significantly improved in both groups postoperatively. According to intergroup comparisons, the OLIF group had significantly less blood loss and superior improvement in radiologic parameters (DH, SL, and SCA) whereas the TLIF group had significantly shorter operation times. For the OLIF patients who did not undergo posterior decompression, the operation time was similar to that of the TLIF group, but the surgical blood loss and length of hospital stay were significantly reduced compared with the TLIF group. Conclusions: Compared with TLIF, OLIF provides similar clinical outcomes, leads to less surgical blood loss, and has superior radiologic parameters; however, the operation time is significantly longer. OLIF without posterior decompression may be a superior option to TLIF for certain patients.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disease
    Li, Hui-Min
    Zhang, Ren-Jie
    Shen, Cai-Liang
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 : E627 - E638
  • [22] Comparative study of clinical effects between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in the treatment of degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine
    Wang, YiXiao
    Song, Yang
    Ma, Yue
    Sun, Xinyu
    Wang, Hua
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 40 (10) : 2238 - 2242
  • [23] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) in Interbody Fusion Technique for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chang, Min Cheol
    Kim, Gang-Un
    Choo, Yoo Jin
    Lee, Gun Woo
    LIFE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [24] Comparison of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Direct Lumbar Interbody Fusion : Clinical and Radiological Results
    Lee, Young Seok
    Kim, Young Baeg
    Park, Seung Won
    Chung, Chan
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2014, 56 (06) : 469 - 474
  • [25] Comparing Miniopen and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Degeneration
    Lo, Wei-Lun
    Lin, Chien-Min
    Yeh, Yi-Shian
    Su, Yu-kai
    Tseng, Yuan-Yun
    Yang, Shun-Tai
    Lin, Jai-Wei
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 2015
  • [26] Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease A STROBE-compliant study
    Zhu, Guangduo
    Hao, Yingjie
    Yu, Lei
    Cai, Yingchun
    Yang, Xiaowei
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (40)
  • [27] Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Which One in Which Patient?
    Dada, Abraham
    Liles, Campbell
    Kanter, Adam S.
    Alan, Nima
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2025, 36 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [28] Oblique lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yun-lu
    Li, Xi-yong
    Liu, Lun
    Li, Song-feng
    Han, Peng-fei
    Li, Xiao-dong
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [29] Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Lan, Tao
    Hu, Shi-Yu
    Zhang, Yuan-Tao
    Zheng, Yu-Chen
    Zhang, Rui
    Shen, Zhe
    Yang, Xin-Jian
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 112 : 86 - 93
  • [30] Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion vs. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Gao, Quan-You
    Wei, Fei-Long
    Li, Tian
    Zhu, Kai-Long
    Du, Ming-Rui
    Heng, Wei
    Yang, Fan
    Gao, Hao-Ran
    Qian, Ji-Xian
    Zhou, Cheng-Pei
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9