A Comparative Study between Single-Level Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Adjacent Segment Disease

被引:0
作者
Chang, Chung-Tse [1 ]
Lin, Yu-Hsien [1 ]
Wu, Yun-Che [1 ]
Shih, Cheng-Min [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Kun-Hui [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Pan, Chien-Chou [1 ,5 ]
Lee, Cheng-Hung [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
[2] Hungkuang Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
[3] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Coll Med, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
[4] Hungkuang Univ, Coll Intelligent Technol, Dept Biomed Engn, Taichung 43304, Taiwan
[5] Jenteh Jr Coll Med Nursing & Management, Dept Rehabil Sci, Miaoli 35664, Taiwan
关键词
lumbar spine; adjacent segment disease (ASD); oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF); transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF); COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13195843
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background/Objectives: Various surgical approaches have been proposed for treating adjacent segment disease (ASD) after lumbar fusion. However, studies using oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) to treat ASD are lacking. The current study assessed the postoperative outcomes of single-level OLIF for ASD, comparing the results with those for patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Methods: Patients who underwent single-level OLIF or TLIF for lumbar ASD were retrospectively included. Clinical outcomes, that is, the results of assessments using the Euroqol 5-Dimension quality of life scale (EQ-5D), the Oswestry Disability Index, and the visual analog scale, were evaluated. Radiologic parameters, including disc height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), segmental coronal angle (SCA), lumbar lordosis, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, were also assessed. Results: A total of 65 patients were enrolled: 32 in the OLIF group and 33 in the TLIF group. The median follow-up time was 24.0 months in both groups. The clinical outcomes and radiologic parameters significantly improved in both groups postoperatively. According to intergroup comparisons, the OLIF group had significantly less blood loss and superior improvement in radiologic parameters (DH, SL, and SCA) whereas the TLIF group had significantly shorter operation times. For the OLIF patients who did not undergo posterior decompression, the operation time was similar to that of the TLIF group, but the surgical blood loss and length of hospital stay were significantly reduced compared with the TLIF group. Conclusions: Compared with TLIF, OLIF provides similar clinical outcomes, leads to less surgical blood loss, and has superior radiologic parameters; however, the operation time is significantly longer. OLIF without posterior decompression may be a superior option to TLIF for certain patients.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Single-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Singh, Kern
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2022, 30 (21) : E1382 - E1390
  • [12] Postoperative Opioid Use Following Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared with Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
    Toci, Gregory R.
    Lambrechts, Mark J.
    Heard, Jeremy C.
    Karamian, Brian A.
    Siegel, Nicholas M.
    V. Carter, Michael
    Curran, John G.
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Kaye, I. David
    Woods, Barrett I.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 165 : E546 - E554
  • [13] Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kulkarni, Arvind G.
    Bohra, Hussain
    Dhruv, Abhilash
    Sarraf, Abhishek
    Bassi, Anupreet
    Patil, Vishwanath M.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 50 (05) : 464 - 472
  • [14] Predictors of Spontaneous Restoration of Lumbar Lordosis after Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Diseases
    Ohyama, Shuhei
    Aoki, Yasuchika
    Inoue, Masahiro
    Nakajima, Takayuki
    Sato, Yusuke
    Watanabe, Atsuya
    Takahashi, Hiroshi
    Kubota, Go
    Nakajima, Arata
    Saito, Junya
    Eguchi, Yawara
    Orita, Sumihisa
    Nakagawa, Koichi
    Ohtori, Seiji
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2021, 5 (06): : 397 - 404
  • [15] Comparison of midline lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of lumbar degeneration disease
    Zhang, Xuelei
    Zhang, Yu
    Gu, Zuchao
    Li, Guo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [16] Effect of Approach Based Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters and Functional Outcomes: Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF)
    Jain, Mantu
    Sethy, Siddharth S.
    Sahoo, Auroshish
    Khan, Shahnawaz
    Tripathy, Sujit
    Ramasubbu, Mathan Kumar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2025, 59 (01) : 40 - 46
  • [17] Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Traumatic Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
    徐建广
    曾炳芳
    孔维清
    周蔚
    付一山
    赵必增
    张涛
    连小峰
    Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University(Science), 2010, 15 (05) : 626 - 631
  • [18] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for traumatic lumbar spondylolisthesis
    Xu J.-G.
    Zeng B.-F.
    Kong W.-Q.
    Zhou W.
    Fu Y.-S.
    Zhao B.-Z.
    Zhang T.
    Lian X.-F.
    Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science), 2010, 15 (05) : 626 - 631
  • [19] Comparative Study of Cage Subsidence in Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Hiyama, Akihiko
    Sakai, Daisuke
    Katoh, Hiroyuki
    Nomura, Satoshi
    Sato, Masato
    Watanabe, Masahiko
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [20] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis
    Zhang, Qing-Yi
    Tan, Jie
    Huang, Kai
    Xie, Hui-Qi
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2021, 22 (01)