A Hardware Approach For Accelerating Inductive Learning In Description Logic

被引:2
作者
Algahtani, Eyad [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Inductive logic programming; description logic; embedded artificial intelligence; FPGA; machine learning;
D O I
10.1145/3665277
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The employment of Machine Learning (ML) techniques in embedded systems has seen constant growth in recent years, especially for black-box ML techniques (such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs)). However, despite the successful employment of ML techniques in embedded environments, their performance potential is constrained by the limited computing resources of their embedded computers. Several hardware-based approaches were developed (e.g., using FPGAs and ASICs) to address the constraints of limited computing resources. The scope of this work focuses on improving the performance for Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) on embedded environments. ILP is a powerful logic-based ML technique that uses logic programming to construct human-interpretable ML models, where those logic-based ML models are capable of describing complex and multi-relational concepts. In this work, we present a hardware-based approach that accelerates the hypothesis evaluation task for ILPs in embedded environments that use Description Logic (DL) languages as their logic-based representation. In particular, we target the ALCQ((D)) language. According to experimental results (through an FPGA implementation), our presented approach has achieved speedups up to 48.7-fold for a disjunction of 32 concepts on 100 M individuals, where the baseline performance is the sequential CPU performance of the Raspberry Pi 4. For role and concrete role restrictions, the FPGA implementation achieved speedups up to 2.4-fold (for MIN cardinality role restriction on 1M role assertions); all FPGA implemented role and concrete role restrictions have achieved similar speedups. In the worst-case scenario, the FPGA implementation achieved either a similar or slightly better performance than the baseline (for all DL operations); the worst-case scenario resulted from using small datasets such as: using conjunction and disjunction on < 100 individuals, and using role and concrete (float/string) role restrictions on < 100,000 assertions.
引用
收藏
页数:37
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mining Library Specifications using Inductive Logic Programming
    Sankaranarayanan, Sriram
    Ivancic, Franjo
    Gupta, Aarti
    ICSE'08 PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTIETH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2008, : 131 - 140
  • [42] Improving expressivity of inductive logic programming by learning different kinds of fuzzy rules
    Serrurier, Mathieu
    Prade, Henri
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2007, 11 (05) : 459 - 466
  • [43] Exploration of picture grammars, grammar learning and inductive logic programming for image understanding
    Ducksbury, PG
    Kennedy, C
    Lock, Z
    AUTOMATIC TARGET RECOGNITION XIII, 2003, 5094 : 386 - 397
  • [44] Inductive logic programming at 30
    Cropper, Andrew
    Dumancic, Sebastijan
    Evans, Richard
    Muggleton, Stephen H.
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2022, 111 (01) : 147 - 172
  • [45] A Survey on Inductive Logic Programming
    Dai W.
    Zhou Z.
    Jisuanji Yanjiu yu Fazhan/Computer Research and Development, 2019, 56 (01): : 138 - 154
  • [46] Unsupervised learning of word segmentation rules with genetic algorithms and inductive logic programming
    Kazakov, D
    Manandhar, S
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 43 (1-2) : 121 - 162
  • [47] Inductive logic programming at 30
    Andrew Cropper
    Sebastijan Dumančić
    Richard Evans
    Stephen H. Muggleton
    Machine Learning, 2022, 111 : 147 - 172
  • [48] Generating contrastive explanations for inductive logic programming based on a near miss approach
    Rabold, Johannes
    Siebers, Michael
    Schmid, Ute
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2022, 111 (05) : 1799 - 1820
  • [49] Ontology Population from the Web: an Inductive Logic Programming-Based Approach
    Lima, Rinaldo
    Oliveira, Hilario
    Freitas, Fred
    Espinasse, Bernard
    2014 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: NEW GENERATIONS (ITNG), 2014, : 473 - 478
  • [50] Generating contrastive explanations for inductive logic programming based on a near miss approach
    Johannes Rabold
    Michael Siebers
    Ute Schmid
    Machine Learning, 2022, 111 : 1799 - 1820