A blockchain platform selection method with heterogeneous multi-criteria Decision-Making based on hybrid distance measures and an AHP-EWM weight method

被引:13
作者
Liu, Jun [1 ]
Zhang, Qi [1 ]
Xie, Mingyue [2 ]
Lin, Mingwei [3 ]
Xu, Zeshui [4 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Software Engn, Chongqing 400065, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Chengdu 611731, Peoples R China
[3] Fujian Normal Univ, Coll Comp & Cyber Secur, Fuzhou 350117, Fujian, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610000, Peoples R China
关键词
Blockchain; Multi-criteria decision-making; TOPSIS; Hybrid distance measures; AHP-EWM weight method; LINGUISTIC TERM SETS; SIMILARITY MEASURES; FUZZY-SETS; MCDM; TECHNOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; ENTROPY; TOPSIS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124910
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The blockchain platforms (BPs) have emerged as important tools for improving enterprise data security. However, the selection of a suitable BP for is a challenging issue for enterprises. In this paper, a novel heterogenous multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model is proposed to facilitate the BP selection and evaluation process. First, the evaluation criteria for BPs are defined through an analysis of popular BPs. Second, based on the defined evaluation criteria, multiple types of fuzzy numbers are adopted to accurately represent the evaluation criteria. Then, to deal with multiple types of fuzzy numbers, a hybrid distance measure is proposed to determine the negative and positive ideal separation matrices of the evaluation criteria. In addition, using the axiomatic design's information content metric the as basis, an improved method is proposed to unify the evaluation of multiple types into a single number. An improved weight method is then proposed based on the combination of objective and subjective weighting to obtain the comprehensive weights of the criteria. Finally, a closeness degree metric is introduced to obtain the ranking order of all BP alternatives. An example case is analyzed to illustrate how to evaluate and select a suitable BP. The superiority of the proposed heterogeneous model is verified by comparisons with state-of-the-art methods.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Blockchain for Businesses: A Scoping Review of Suitability Evaluations Frameworks [J].
Almeshal T.A. ;
Alhogail A.A. .
IEEE Access, 2021, 9 :155425-155442
[2]   MORE ON INTUITIONISTIC FUZZY-SETS [J].
ATANASSOV, KT .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1989, 33 (01) :37-45
[3]   A decision-making framework for blockchain platform evaluation in spherical fuzzy environment [J].
Bonab, Shabnam Rahnamay ;
Yousefi, Samuel ;
Tosarkani, Babak Mohamadpour ;
Ghoushchi, Saeid Jafarzadeh .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 231
[4]   A decision-making framework for evaluating appropriate business blockchain platforms using multiple preference formats and VIKOR [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Tufekci, Gizem .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 571 :337-357
[5]   RFID service provider selection: An integrated fuzzy MCDM approach [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Karabulut, Yagmur ;
Arsenyan, Jbid .
MEASUREMENT, 2017, 112 :88-98
[6]   Logistics tool selection with two-phase fuzzy multi criteria decision making: A case study for personal digital assistant selection [J].
Buyukozkan, Gulcin ;
Arsenyan, Jbid ;
Ruan, Da .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (01) :142-153
[7]   Assessing the factors influencing blockchain adoption intention in higher education institutes: A mixed method approach [J].
Chawla, Sonia ;
Prakash, Gyan ;
Singh, Gursimranjit ;
Kaur, Japneet .
EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 29 (17) :22651-22679
[8]   A Novel Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model for Building Material Supplier Selection Based on Entropy-AHP Weighted TOPSIS [J].
Chen, Chun-Ho .
ENTROPY, 2020, 22 (02)
[9]   Effects of the entropy weight on TOPSIS [J].
Chen, Pengyu .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 168
[10]   RANKING FUZZY NUMBERS WITH MAXIMIZING SET AND MINIMIZING SET [J].
CHEN, SH .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 17 (02) :113-129