Transformer approach to nowcasting solar energy using geostationary satellite data

被引:0
作者
Li, Ruohan [1 ]
Wang, Dongdong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zhihao [1 ]
Liang, Shunlin [3 ]
Li, Zhanqing [4 ]
Xie, Yiqun [1 ]
He, Jiena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Geog Sci, 2181 LeFrak Hall, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Peking Univ, Inst Remote Sensing & GIS, Sch Earth & Space Sci, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Geog, Hong Kong 999077, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Maryland, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Solar energy forecasting; Photovoltaic technology; Deep learning; Transformer; Near real-time nowcasting; Geostationary satellite; IRRADIANCE; POWER; RADIATION; PREDICTION; MULTISTEP; DISPATCH; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124387
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Unpredicted spatial and temporal variability of global horizontal irradiance (GHI) reaching the photovoltaic panels presents a challenge for integrating solar power into the grid stably and cost-effectively at a regional scale. Therefore, there is a recognized demand for large-scale GHI nowcasting that is both timely and accurate, an area where most existing studies fall short. This study introduces the SolarFormer model, which utilizes satellite data and incorporates a gated recurrent unit for near real-time GHI estimation. It also includes a space-time transformer to provide forecasts with a 3-h lead time at 15-min intervals, maintaining accuracy without significant degradation over extended lead times. SolarFormer requires only the selected satellite band information shared by GOES-16 and Himawari-8 as the dynamic input, enabling near-real-time application across all areas covered by these satellites. This feature makes it accessible and efficient for large-scale energy planning. We validate the forecasting result with the ground-measured GHI over seven SURFRAD stations in 2018. The model achieves an hourly prediction root-mean-square error (relative root-mean-square error) of 93.8 W/m(2) (15.0 %), 118.9 W/m(2) (19.8 %), and 129.1 W/m(2) (24.2 %) with 1-3 h lead time respectively. These results demonstrate lower root-mean-square error compared to existing hourly updated numerical weather prediction modeling, such as High-Resolution Rapid Refresh, and deep learning models, such as ConvLSTM. Moreover, the study highlights the potential of SolarFormer for extended lead-time forecasting due to its high computation and memory efficiency compared with the above-mentioned models, potentially benefiting long-term energy planning and power market bidding and clearing. However, SolarFormer exhibits accumulated bias as the predicted lead time increases and faces challenges in predicting GHI in the early morning due to the invalid visible satellite bands during the night, suggesting areas for improvement in future studies.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
  • [1] Al Garni HZ, 2018, ADVANCES IN RENEWABLE ENERGIES AND POWER TECHNOLOGIES, VOL 1: SOLAR AND WIND ENERGIES, P57, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-812959-3.00002-2
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2022, P IEEECVF C COMPUTER, DOI DOI 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00320
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, P 20 EUR PV C MIL IT
  • [4] Solar photovoltaic power forecasting using optimized modified extreme learning machine technique
    Behera, Manoja Kumar
    Majumder, Irani
    Nayak, Niranjan
    [J]. ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL-JESTECH, 2018, 21 (03): : 428 - 438
  • [5] A review and comparison of strategies for multi-step ahead time series forecasting based on the NN5 forecasting competition
    Ben Taieb, Souhaib
    Bontempi, Gianluca
    Atiya, Amir F.
    Sorjamaa, Antti
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (08) : 7067 - 7083
  • [6] Bertasius G, 2021, PR MACH LEARN RES, V139
  • [7] Boussif O., 2024, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, V36
  • [8] British Petroleum (BP), 2021, Statistical Review of World Energy, P2021
  • [9] Intraday probabilistic forecasts of surface solar radiation with cloud scale-dependent autoregressive advection
    Carpentieri, A.
    Folini, D.
    Nerini, D.
    Pulkkinen, S.
    Wild, M.
    Meyer, A.
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2023, 351
  • [10] Cheng HB, 2006, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V3918, P765