The push-through total femoral prosthesis for revision of a total hip or knee replacement with extreme bone loss

被引:0
|
作者
Bakircioglu, Sancar [1 ]
Bulut, Abdulkadir M. [2 ]
Oral, Melih [2 ]
Caglar, Omur [2 ]
Atilla, Bulent [2 ]
Tokgozoglu, A. Mazhar [2 ]
机构
[1] TOBB Univ Econ & Technol, Dept Paediat, Ankara, Turkiye
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
Hip arthroplasty; hip arthroplasty revision; the push-through total femoral prothesis; severe bone loss; ENDOPROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT; RECONSTRUCTION; ARTHROPLASTY; ALLOGRAFTS; SALVAGE; RESECTION; FEMUR; STOCK;
D O I
10.1177/11207000241282111
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess outcomes of using the push-through total femoral prothesis (PTTF) for revision total hip replacement with extreme bone loss.Methods: 10 consecutive patients who received PTTF between 2012 and 2018 for revision hip arthroplasty were included in the study. Primary functional outcomes were assessed using Harris Hip Score (HHS), Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores. Range of motion, complications, and ambulatory status were also recorded to assess secondary outcomes.Results: 2 of 10 patients underwent surgery with PTTF for both knee and hip arthroplasty revision. The mean time between index surgery and PTTF was 15 years (3-32 yrs). Acetabular components were revised in 6 of 10 patients during PTTF application. After a mean follow-up of 5.9 years, hip dislocations occurred in 3 patients. All of the dislocated hips were ones with retained conventional non-constrained acetabular bearings. Patient satisfaction was high (MSTS: 67%, HHS: 61.2%, TESS 64.6%) despite high re-operation rate (40%) and minor postoperative problems.Conclusions: PTTF should be considered for hip and knee arthroplasty revision procedures in patients with an extreme bone defect. Consistent usage of constrained liners should be considered to avoid hip dislocation, which was our main problem following the procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty
    Bush, Jeffrey L.
    Wilson, Joseph B.
    Vail, T. Parker
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (452) : 186 - 192
  • [42] TOTAL KNEE REVISION IN THE PRESENCE OF EXTENSIVE BONE LOSS
    GALLANNAUGH, SC
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1987, 69 (05): : 850 - 850
  • [43] Bone loss management in total knee revision surgery
    Gabriele Panegrossi
    Marco Ceretti
    Matteo Papalia
    Filippo Casella
    Fabio Favetti
    Francesco Falez
    International Orthopaedics, 2014, 38 : 419 - 427
  • [44] Managing bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty
    Lee, Yong Seuk
    Chen, Antonia F.
    ANNALS OF JOINT, 2016, 1
  • [45] Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty
    Huff, Thomas W.
    Sculco, Thomas P.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (07): : 32 - 36
  • [46] IMPACTION BONE GRAFTING FOR SEVERE FEMORAL BONE LOSS Surgical Technique in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Astore, Franco
    Molho, Nicolas M.
    Piccaluga, Francisco
    Comba, Fernando
    Slullitel, Pablo A.
    Buttaro, Martin A.
    JBJS ESSENTIAL SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [47] Cementless revision of total hip arthroplasty using the anatomic porous replacement revision prosthesis
    Buoncristiani, AM
    Dorr, LD
    Johnson, C
    Wan, Z
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1997, 12 (04): : 403 - 415
  • [48] Distal femoral allograft reconstruction for massive osteolytic bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty
    Bezwada, HP
    Shah, AR
    Zambito, K
    Cerynik, DL
    Johanson, NA
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (02): : 242 - 248
  • [49] The role and results of bone grafting in revision total knee replacement
    Sculco, TP
    Choi, JC
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1998, 29 (02) : 339 - +
  • [50] BONE-GRAFTS FOR BONE LOSS WITH TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT
    DORR, LD
    ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1989, 20 (02) : 179 - 187