The Delphi Technique in Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology: Extensive Scoping Review, Insights, and Recommendations for Scholars

被引:1
作者
Quartiroli, Alessandro [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Psychol, 1725 State St, La Crosse, WI 54601 USA
[2] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Sport Hlth & Exercise Sci, Portsmouth, Hants, England
关键词
consensus-based research; Delphi studies; research methods; reporting recommendations; scoping review; NOMINAL GROUP; CONSENSUS; DESIGN; METHODOLOGY; GUIDELINES; EDUCATION; CRITERIA; LIFE;
D O I
10.1037/spy0000364
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The Delphi technique is a systematic research method generally used to identify priorities, reach consensus, and establish guidelines about a particular research question or topic using the collective opinion of a panel of experts. This technique has recently been used with more frequency by sport, exercise, and performance psychology (SEPP) researchers. Despite this growth, there are no clear recommendations for conducting a Delphi study within the SEPP-specific literature, potentially resulting in methodological confusion. The two aims of this article were to (a) offer a timely overview of the use of the Delphi technique in the existing SEPP literature and (b) offer a series of considerations and recommendations for researchers to consider when planning, conducting, and reporting on the finding of a study using a Delphi technique, based on existing methodological literature. Using a scoping review method, from an initial pool of 5,036 articles published between 2000 and 2024, I identified a total of 54 peer-reviewed articles that met the inclusion criteria of: (a) language-published in English, Spanish, Italian, French, or Portuguese; (b) domain-focused on SEPP research domains; (c) publication type-peer-reviewed articles; and (d) design-Delphi techniques were used. The analysis of these articles showed minor inconsistencies in reporting essential elements of Delphi methods. Based on the results of the scoping review and grounded in the Delphi methodological literature, with this article, I offer a roadmap for scholars interested in utilizing the Delphi technique and for reviewers and editors to assess the quality and rigor of these studies.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 77
页数:21
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [81] Shariff N.J., 2015, Journal of Nursing Care, V04, P246, DOI [DOI 10.4172/2167-1168.1000246, 10.4172/2167-1168.1000246]
  • [82] Consensus statements that fail to recognise dissent are flawed by design: a narrative review with 10 suggested improvements
    Shrier, Ian
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 55 (10) : 545 - 549
  • [83] Organizational stress and well-being in competitive sport: a systematic review
    Simpson, Richard A. C.
    Didymus, Faye F.
    Williams, Toni L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 17 (01) : 116 - 144
  • [84] Generalizability in qualitative research: misunderstandings, opportunities and recommendations for the sport and exercise sciences
    Smith, Brett
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN SPORT EXERCISE AND HEALTH, 2018, 10 (01) : 137 - 149
  • [85] Requirements for sustainable nature-based tourism in transfrontier conservation areas: A southern African Delphi consultation
    Spenceley, Anna
    [J]. TOURISM GEOGRAPHIES, 2008, 10 (03) : 285 - 311
  • [86] Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review
    Spranger, Julia
    Homberg, Angelika
    Sonnberger, Marco
    Niederberger, Marlen
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2022, 172 : 1 - 11
  • [87] Steinmller K., 2023, DELPHI METHODS SOCIA, P29
  • [88] Feasibility of Parkour-style training in team sport practice: A Delphi study
    Strafford, Ben William
    Davids, Keith
    North, Jamie Stephen
    Stone, Joseph Antony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2022, 40 (20) : 2327 - 2342
  • [89] The unholy marriage? Integrating qualitative and quantitative information in Delphi processes
    Tapio, Petri
    Paloniemi, Riikka
    Varho, Vilja
    Vinnari, Markus
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2011, 78 (09) : 1616 - 1628
  • [90] Predicting the evolution of counseling psychology in the United States: results from a Delphi poll of academic training directors
    Taylor, Jennifer M.
    Kolaski, Alexandra Z.
    Wright, Hannah
    Hashtpari, Halleh
    Neimeyer, Greg J.
    [J]. COUNSELLING PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 2019, 32 (02) : 169 - 185