Policy termination made easy? The emerging trend towards sunsetting antimicrobial resistance national action plans

被引:0
作者
Baekkeskov, Erik [1 ]
Rubin, Olivier [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Roskilde Univ, Dept Social Sci & Business, Universitetsvej 1, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
Policy termination; policy succession; political commitment; persistent crises; antimicrobial resistance; national action plans; global action plan;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2024.2371834
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
While policy termination is usually more difficult than continuity in domestic policymaking, the international process for addressing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) shows that sustaining commitments can be the more difficult path. Addressing persistent crises requires persistent policy responses across multiple countries. Policy coordination among many countries has gained significant scholarly attention whereas analyses of continuing, longer-term commitments of many countries to crisis response are less common. This paper remedies this shortfall by analysing the commitments of different countries to the international policy process against AMR. It triangulates novel evidence in the form of distinct indicators based on global surveys, content analysis of national action plans (NAPs), and publication patterns of second-generation NAPs. The findings suggest that national commitments to the international process initially reached high levels but are now in decline. Countries are effectively 'sunsetting' their NAPs, and thereby ending commitments to the international process for addressing AMR. Many have refrained from renewing their NAPs, and those that do renew rarely show signs of learning or adaptation from previous NAPs. Hence, even in the AMR case, where a global and persistent threat rose high on the international political agenda, long-term commitment to the international response policy process is by no means assured.
引用
收藏
页码:3957 / 3980
页数:24
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [31] What are the barriers to implementing national antimicrobial resistance action plans? A novel mixed-methods policy analysis in Pakistan
    Khan, Mishal S.
    Durrance-Bagale, Anna
    Mateus, Ana
    Sultana, Zia
    Hasan, Rumina
    Hanefeld, Johanna
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2020, 35 (08) : 973 - 982
  • [32] Kingdon J. W., 2003, AGENDAS ALTERNATIVES, DOI DOI 10.1002/PAM.4050050316
  • [33] Kirkpatrick SE., 1999, Policy Stud Rev, V16, P209, DOI DOI 10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00847.x
  • [34] Kouroutakis AE, 2017, CONSTITUTIONAL VALUE OF SUNSET CLAUSES: AN HISTORICAL AND NORMATIVE ANALYSIS, P1
  • [35] Measuring political will: An index of commitment to disaster risk reduction
    Lassa, Jonatan A.
    Surjan, Akhilesh
    Caballero-Anthony, Mely
    Fisher, Rohan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2019, 34 : 64 - 74
  • [36] Mitkidis K., 2023, STEERING SUPERBUGS G, P253
  • [37] Vested Interests and Political Institutions
    Moe, Terry M.
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2015, 130 (02) : 277 - 318
  • [38] Morris D., 2018, NATL ACTION PLANS BU
  • [39] Mpundu M., 2023, Steering Against Superbugs: The Global Governance of Antimicrobial Resistance, P83, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780192899477.003.0007
  • [40] The global governance of antimicrobial resistance: a cross-country study of alignment between the global action plan and national action plans
    Munkholm, Louise
    Rubin, Olivier
    [J]. GLOBALIZATION AND HEALTH, 2020, 16 (01)