A gender perspective on the role of technology in democratic development through wartime civic engagement

被引:0
作者
Matveieva, Olga [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dnipro Univ Technol, Inst Publ Adm, Dnipro, Ukraine
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Marie Jahoda Ctr Int Gender Studies, Bochum, Germany
关键词
Technology; gender; society; civic engagement; democracy; SDG 5: gender equality; Ukraine; war; development; policy; PARTICIPATION;
D O I
10.1080/09589236.2024.2387197
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Civic engagement during crisis response not only addresses immediate challenges but also acts as a catalyst for democratic development. In a diverse society facing collective threats, such as a military invasion, people learn to manage and respond to crises cooperatively, searching for effective instruments of self-organizing and responding. Technology plays a crucial role in empowering civic actors, enabling them to acquire both interpersonal and political power for effective co-action. Recognizing that their actions take place within socio-technical arrangements where technology, institutions, and societies are interconnected and mutually influential is essential. Although, technology use entails certain risks, this interconnectivity enhances inclusivity, providing benefits to individuals of all genders, particularly those who encounter barriers to physical participation. It amplifies the voices of women and LGBTIQ+ individuals, thereby increasing the efficiency and convenience of engaging in efforts to address socially significant issues. This paper delves into the nuanced, gendered role that technology plays in the democratic development of a society at war through its civic engagement in the collective response to threats, highlighting the transformative potential of technological inclusivity in fostering democratic resilience against external threats.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] Matveieva O., 2022, Adoption of public e-services versus civic tech services: On the issue of citizen political subjectivity in Ukraine and Belarus. EGOV-2022 Sweden, P15, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15086-92, DOI 10.1007/978-3-031-15086-92]
  • [22] Adoption of Public e-services versus Civic Tech Services: On the Issue of Trust and Citizen Participation in Ukraine and Belarus
    Matveieva, Olga
    Navumau, Vasil
    Gustafsson, Mariana
    [J]. ELECTRONIC GOVERNMENT, EGOV 2022, 2022, 13391 : 15 - 30
  • [23] Medlin B., 2007, Journal of Information Technology Management, V18, P14
  • [24] Exploring doing activism as a means for political action and social transformation in Germany
    Muellenmeister, Christina
    Maersk, Jesper Larsen
    Farias, Lisette
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 30 (03) : 377 - 389
  • [25] Oyeleye A., 2023, Journal of International Womens Studies, V25, DOI [https://doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720130905.2702, DOI 10.3968/J.CSS.1923669720130905.2702]
  • [26] Pavliuc A., 2022, Wartime, gender, and social media: Political communication before and during the Ukraine war
  • [27] Pereira A., 2012, Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, V18, P255, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.2013003830, DOI 10.1615/JWOMENMINORSCIENENG.2013003830]
  • [28] Algorithmic Political Bias in Artificial Intelligence Systems
    Peters U.
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2022, 35 (2)
  • [29] Pillan M., 2022, Experimenting the role of UX design in the definition of gender-sensitive service design policies
  • [30] Porshnev A., 2021, Social computing and social media: Experience design and social network analysis. HCII, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77626-823, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-77626-823]