Compressive Behavior of Novel Additively Manufactured Ti-6Al-4V Lattice Structures: Experimental and Numerical Studies

被引:2
作者
Aljaberi, Mohammed Hussein Kadhim [1 ]
Aghdam, Mohammad M. [1 ]
Goudarzi, Taha [1 ]
Al-Waily, Muhannad [2 ]
机构
[1] Amirkabir Univ Technol, Tehran Polytech, Dept Mech Engn, Hafez Ave, Tehran 1591634311, Iran
[2] Univ Kufa, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Najaf 540011, Iraq
关键词
additive manufacturing; selective laser melting; porous biomaterials; lattice structures; functionally graded; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; CELL-TYPE; POROSITY; IMPLANTS; DESIGN;
D O I
10.3390/ma17153691
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This paper presents novel configurations for additively manufactured lattice structures, including helical and elliptic designs, in addition to the pyramid base model. Functionally graded versions of the pyramid and elliptic lattice structures are developed by considering desirable relative densities in each layer. The lattice structures were manufactured using Ti-6Al-4V powder in a three-dimensional selective laser melting printer. The averaged porosities are 0.86, 0.91, 0.916, 0.93 and 0.74 for pyramid, functionally graded pyramid, elliptic, functionally graded elliptic and helical, respectively. The mechanical behavior of the lattice structures was characterized through compression tests using a universal testing machine and computationally analyzed using finite element code. The results indicate that the elliptic and functionally graded elliptic lattices have elastic moduli of 0.76 and 0.67 GPa, while the yield strengths are 41.32 and 32.24 MPa, respectively, in comparison to cancellous bone. Moreover, pyramid, functionally graded pyramid, and helical lattices show relatively lower elastic moduli of 0.57, 0.65 and 0.41 GPa and higher yield strengths of 54.1, 52.15 and 61.02 MPa, respectively. This could be an indication that they are fit for cortical bones. All samples have low elastic moduli coupled with high yield strengths. This could reduce or eliminate stress shielding, making them suitable for some load-bearing bio-inspired applications. A comparative study utilizing experimental and numerical models was conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed designs.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Microarchitected Stretching-Dominated Mechanical Metamaterials with Minimal Surface Topologies [J].
Al-Ketan, Oraib ;
Rezgui, Rachid ;
Rowshan, Reza ;
Du, Huifeng ;
Fang, Nicholas X. ;
Abu Al-Rub, Rashid K. .
ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2018, 20 (09)
[2]  
Aljaberi M.H., 2020, P IOP C SERIES MAT S, VVolume 1094
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, ASTM F3001-14
[4]   Current trends in additive manufacturing of selective laser melting for biomedical implant applications [J].
Aufa, A. N. ;
Hassan, Mohamad Zaki ;
Ismail, Zarini ;
Ramlie, Faizir ;
Jamaludin, Khairur Rijal ;
Daud, Mohd Yusof Md ;
Ren, James .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY-JMR&T, 2024, 31 :213-243
[5]   Mechanical properties of open-cell rhombic dodecahedron cellular structures [J].
Babaee, Sahab ;
Jahromi, Babak Haghpanah ;
Ajdari, Amin ;
Nayeb-Hashemi, Hamid ;
Vaziri, Ashkan .
ACTA MATERIALIA, 2012, 60 (6-7) :2873-2885
[6]   Design, Simulation, and Mechanical Testing of 3D-Printed Titanium Lattice Structures [J].
Bari, Klaudio .
JOURNAL OF COMPOSITES SCIENCE, 2023, 7 (01)
[7]   Tailoring Selective Laser Melting Process Parameters for NiTi Implants [J].
Bormann, Therese ;
Schumacher, Ralf ;
Mueller, Bert ;
Mertmann, Matthias ;
de Wild, Michael .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS ENGINEERING AND PERFORMANCE, 2012, 21 (12) :2519-2524
[8]   Multi-physics topology optimization of functionally graded controllable porous structures: Application to heat dissipating problems [J].
Das, Sourav ;
Sutradhar, Alok .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2020, 193
[9]  
de Wild M, 2013, TISSUE ENG PT A, V19, P2645, DOI [10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0753, 10.1089/ten.TEA.2012.0753]
[10]   Modelling and characterization of a porosity graded lattice structure for additively manufactured biomaterials [J].
Dumas, Mathieu ;
Terriault, Patrick ;
Brailovski, Vladimir .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2017, 121 :383-392