Distal biceps tendon repair using a double intracortical button anatomic footprint repair technique

被引:1
作者
Hochreiter, Bettina [1 ,2 ]
Eckers, Franziska [1 ,3 ]
Calek, Anna-Katharina [1 ,2 ]
Cassidy, J. Tristan [1 ]
Amaranath, Jeevaka E. [1 ]
Leung, Megan [1 ,4 ]
Ek, Eugene T. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Windsor, Melbourne Orthopaed Grp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Zurich, Balgrist Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Forchstr 340, CH-8008 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Orthoped, Basel, Switzerland
[4] Monash Univ, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Elbow; distal biceps tendon; tear; repair; anatomic footprint repair; intracortical button; DOUBLE-INCISION TECHNIQUE; RUPTURES; SINGLE; TUBEROSITY; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.028
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Distal biceps tendon repair is usually performed via a double-incision or single-incision bicortical drilling technique. However, these techniques are associated with specific complications and usually do not allow for anatomic footprint restoration. It was the aim of this study to report the clinical results of a double intracortical button anatomic footprint repair technique for distal biceps tendon tears. We hypothesized that this technique would result in supination strength comparable to the uninjured side with a low rerupture rate and minimal bony or neurologic complications. Material and Methods: This was a retrospective, single-surgeon cohort study of a consecutive series of 22 patients with a mean (standard deviation) age of 50.7 (9.4) years and at least 1-year follow-up after distal biceps tendon repair. At final follow-up, complications, range of motion (ROM), the Patient-rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, patient satisfaction, and supination strength in neutral as well as 60 degrees of supination were analyzed. Radiographic evaluation was performed on a computed tomography scan. Results: One patient (4.5%) experienced slight paresthesia in the area of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve. Heterotopic ossification was seen in 1 patient (4.5%). All patients recovered full ROM except for 1 who had 10 degrees of loss of flexion and extension. Median PREE score was 4.6 (0-39.6), median MEP was 100 (70-100), and median DASH score was 1.4 (0-16.7). All but 1 patient were very satisfied with the outcome. The affected arm had a mean of 98% (+/- 13%) of neutral supination strength (P = .633) and 94% (+/- 12%) of supination strength in 60 degrees (P = .054) compared with the contralateral, unaffected side. There were 4 cases (18.2%) of cortical thinning due to at least 1 button and 1 case of button pullout (4.5%). Conclusions: The double intracortical button anatomic footprint repair technique seems to provide reliable restoration of supination strength and excellent patient satisfaction while minimizing complications, particularly nerve damage and heterotopic ossification. (c) 2024 The Author(s). This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:2243 / 2251
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Complications After Distal Biceps Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review [J].
Amarasooriya, Melanie ;
Bain, Gregory Ian ;
Roper, Tom ;
Bryant, Kimberley ;
Iqbal, Karim ;
Phadnis, Joideep .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (12) :3103-3111
[2]   Complications of Distal Biceps Tendon Repair A Meta-analysis of Single-Incision Versus Double-Incision Surgical Technique [J].
Amin, Nirav H. ;
Volpi, Alex ;
Lynch, T. Sean ;
Patel, Ronak M. ;
Cerynik, Douglas L. ;
Schickendantz, Mark S. ;
Jones, Morgan H. .
ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 4 (10)
[3]   The distal biceps tendon: Footprint and relevant clinical anatomy [J].
Athwal, George S. ;
Steinmann, Scott P. ;
Rispoli, Damian A. .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 32A (08) :1225-1229
[4]  
Bain GI, 2000, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V9, P120
[5]  
Caekebeke Pieter, 2022, JSES Int, V6, P530, DOI 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.01.010
[6]  
Caekebeke Pieter, 2016, J Hand Surg Am, V41, pe447, DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.08.014
[7]   Single- versus double-incision technique for the treatment of distal biceps tendon rupture [J].
Castioni, D. ;
Mercurio, M. ;
Fanelli, D. ;
Cosentino, O. ;
Gasparini, G. ;
Galasso, O. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (12) :1608-1617
[8]   Repair of the ruptured distal biceps tendon - A systematic review [J].
Chavan, Prithviraj R. ;
Duquin, Thomas R. ;
Bisson, Leslie J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (08) :1618-1624
[9]   Distal biceps tendon anatomy: A cadaveric study [J].
Eames, M. H. A. ;
Bain, G. I. ;
Fogg, Q. A. ;
van Riet, R. P. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (05) :1044-1049
[10]   Biomechanical Comparison of Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Techniques: Extracortical Single-Button Inlay Fixation Versus Intracortical Double-Button Onlay Anatomic Footprint Fixation [J].
Ernstbrunner, Lukas ;
Almond, Mitchell ;
Rupasinghe, Harshi S. ;
Jo, Olivia I. ;
Zbeda, Robert M. ;
Ackland, David C. ;
Ek, Eugene T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (07) :1895-1903