Evaluation of Four Cloud Microphysical Schemes Simulating Arctic Low-Level Clouds Observed During the ACLOUD Experiment

被引:0
|
作者
Nam, Jihyun [1 ]
Cho, Yeonsoo [1 ]
Lim, Kyo-Sun [2 ]
Jun, Sang-Yoon [3 ]
Kim, Joo-Hong [3 ]
Park, Sang-Jong [3 ]
Kim, Sang-Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[2] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Earth Syst Sci, Daegu 41566, South Korea
[3] Korea Polar Res Inst, Incheon 21990, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Arctic clouds; ACLOUD; PWRF; Cloud microphysics scheme; MIXED-PHASE CLOUDS; IN-SITU; PART I; CONDENSATION NUCLEI; BOUNDARY-LAYER; WRF MODEL; ICE; PARAMETERIZATION; GREENLAND; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s13143-024-00378-0
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
We investigated the microphysical characteristics of low-level Arctic clouds using four cloud microphysics parameterization schemes (Morrison, WDM6, NSSL, and P3) implemented in the Polar-optimized Weather Research and Forecasting (PWRF) model. Our assessment was based on a comparison with data collected during the Arctic Cloud Observations Using Airborne Measurements during the Polar Day (ACLOUD) experiment, which occurred near Svalbard between May and June 2017. During the ACLOUD campaign, a substantial number of clouds were observed, primarily influenced by adiabatic motions and sensible/latent heat fluxes that led to air masses warming up by 4 degrees C as they traversed over the sea ice and ocean transition zone. Among the parameterization schemes tested, the Morrison and WDM6 schemes demonstrated superior performance overall, showing frequency bias (FB) values closer to 1 (1.07 and 1.13) and high log-odds ratios (0.50 and 0.48) in cloud occurrence predictions, indicating good agreement with observed data. In contrast, the NSSL and P3 schemes exhibited higher FB values (1.30 and 1.56) with lower log-odds ratios (0.17 and 0.16), indicating an overestimation of cloud occurrence. The WDM6 scheme produced higher ice-mixing ratios compared to Morrison and NSSL schemes, while the latter two tended to generate more snow and graupel. The NSSL scheme showed the least bias in simulating ice water content (IWC) in mixed-phase clouds; however, all schemes generally underestimated both liquid water content (LWC) and IWC. Notably, significant deviations in IWC were observed at an altitude of 1.2 km compared to observations, attributed to differences in temperature thresholds for ice formation. This study emphasizes the importance of developing cloud parameterization in the Arctic based on observations to improve the accuracy of estimating cloud impacts on Arctic climate under rapid Arctic warming trends.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 740
页数:14
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [11] Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. I: Single-layer cloud
    Klein, Stephen A.
    McCoy, Renata B.
    Morrison, Hugh
    Ackerman, Andrew S.
    Avramov, Alexander
    de Boer, Gijs
    Chen, Mingxuan
    Cole, Jason N. S.
    Del Genio, Anthony D.
    Falk, Michael
    Foster, Michael J.
    Fridlind, Ann
    Golaz, Jean-Christophe
    Hashino, Tempei
    Harrington, Jerry Y.
    Hoose, Corinna
    Khairoutdinov, Marat F.
    Larson, Vincent E.
    Liu, Xiaohong
    Luo, Yali
    McFarquhar, Greg M.
    Menon, Surabi
    Neggers, Roel A. J.
    Park, Sungsu
    Poellot, Michael R.
    Schmidt, Jerome M.
    Sednev, Igor
    Shipway, Ben J.
    Shupe, Matthew D.
    Spangenbery, Douglas A.
    Sud, Yogesh C.
    Turner, David D.
    Veron, Dana E.
    von Salzen, Knut
    Walker, Gregory K.
    Wang, Zhien
    Wolf, Audrey B.
    Xie, Shaocheng
    Xu, Kuan-Man
    Yang, Fanglin
    Zhang, Gong
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 135 (641) : 979 - 1002
  • [12] Evaluation of downward and upward solar irradiances simulated by the Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF using airborne observations above Arctic low-level clouds
    Mueller, Hanno
    Ehrlich, Andre
    Jaekel, Evelyn
    Roettenbacher, Johannes
    Kirbus, Benjamin
    Schaefer, Michael
    Hogan, Robin J.
    Wendisch, Manfred
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2024, 24 (07) : 4157 - 4175