Evaluation of Four Cloud Microphysical Schemes Simulating Arctic Low-Level Clouds Observed During the ACLOUD Experiment

被引:0
|
作者
Nam, Jihyun [1 ]
Cho, Yeonsoo [1 ]
Lim, Kyo-Sun [2 ]
Jun, Sang-Yoon [3 ]
Kim, Joo-Hong [3 ]
Park, Sang-Jong [3 ]
Kim, Sang-Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Seoul 08826, South Korea
[2] Kyungpook Natl Univ, Sch Earth Syst Sci, Daegu 41566, South Korea
[3] Korea Polar Res Inst, Incheon 21990, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Arctic clouds; ACLOUD; PWRF; Cloud microphysics scheme; MIXED-PHASE CLOUDS; IN-SITU; PART I; CONDENSATION NUCLEI; BOUNDARY-LAYER; WRF MODEL; ICE; PARAMETERIZATION; GREENLAND; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s13143-024-00378-0
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
We investigated the microphysical characteristics of low-level Arctic clouds using four cloud microphysics parameterization schemes (Morrison, WDM6, NSSL, and P3) implemented in the Polar-optimized Weather Research and Forecasting (PWRF) model. Our assessment was based on a comparison with data collected during the Arctic Cloud Observations Using Airborne Measurements during the Polar Day (ACLOUD) experiment, which occurred near Svalbard between May and June 2017. During the ACLOUD campaign, a substantial number of clouds were observed, primarily influenced by adiabatic motions and sensible/latent heat fluxes that led to air masses warming up by 4 degrees C as they traversed over the sea ice and ocean transition zone. Among the parameterization schemes tested, the Morrison and WDM6 schemes demonstrated superior performance overall, showing frequency bias (FB) values closer to 1 (1.07 and 1.13) and high log-odds ratios (0.50 and 0.48) in cloud occurrence predictions, indicating good agreement with observed data. In contrast, the NSSL and P3 schemes exhibited higher FB values (1.30 and 1.56) with lower log-odds ratios (0.17 and 0.16), indicating an overestimation of cloud occurrence. The WDM6 scheme produced higher ice-mixing ratios compared to Morrison and NSSL schemes, while the latter two tended to generate more snow and graupel. The NSSL scheme showed the least bias in simulating ice water content (IWC) in mixed-phase clouds; however, all schemes generally underestimated both liquid water content (LWC) and IWC. Notably, significant deviations in IWC were observed at an altitude of 1.2 km compared to observations, attributed to differences in temperature thresholds for ice formation. This study emphasizes the importance of developing cloud parameterization in the Arctic based on observations to improve the accuracy of estimating cloud impacts on Arctic climate under rapid Arctic warming trends.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 740
页数:14
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Aerosol Effect on the Cloud Phase of Low-Level Clouds Over the Arctic
    Filioglou, M.
    Mielonen, T.
    Balis, D.
    Giannakaki, E.
    Arola, A.
    Kokkola, H.
    Komppula, M.
    Romakkaniemi, S.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2019, 124 (14) : 7886 - 7899
  • [2] Microphysical processes involving the vapour phase dominate in simulated low-level Arctic clouds
    Kiszler, Theresa
    Ori, Davide
    Schemann, Vera
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2024, 24 (17) : 10039 - 10053
  • [3] Aerosol and dynamical contributions to cloud droplet formation in Arctic low-level clouds
    Motos, Ghislain
    Freitas, Gabriel
    Georgakaki, Paraskevi
    Wieder, Jorg
    Li, Guangyu
    Aas, Wenche
    Lunder, Chris
    Krejci, Radovan
    Pasquier, Julie Therese
    Henneberger, Jan
    David, Robert Oscar
    Ritter, Christoph
    Mohr, Claudia
    Zieger, Paul
    Nenes, Athanasios
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2023, 23 (21) : 13941 - 13956
  • [4] Evaluation of Cloud Microphysical Schemes for a Warm Frontal Snowband during the GPM Cold Season Precipitation Experiment (GCPEx)
    Naeger, Aaron R.
    Colle, Brian A.
    Molthan, Andrew
    MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW, 2017, 145 (11) : 4627 - 4650
  • [5] A long-term study of cloud residuals from low-level Arctic clouds
    Karlsson, Linn
    Krejci, Radovan
    Koike, Makoto
    Ebell, Kerstin
    Zieger, Paul
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2021, 21 (11) : 8933 - 8959
  • [6] Space-based evaluation of interactions between aerosols and low-level Arctic clouds during the Spring and Summer of 2008
    Tietze, K.
    Riedi, J.
    Stohl, A.
    Garrett, T. J.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2011, 11 (07) : 3359 - 3373
  • [7] Modeling of observed mineral dust aerosols in the arctic and the impact on winter season low-level clouds
    Fan, Song-Miao
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2013, 118 (19) : 11161 - 11174
  • [8] Above-cloud concentrations of cloud condensation nuclei help to sustain some Arctic low-level clouds
    Sterzinger, Lucas J.
    Igel, Adele L.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2024, 24 (06) : 3529 - 3540
  • [9] Microphysical and thermodynamic phase analyses of Arctic low-level clouds measured above the sea ice and the open ocean in spring and summer
    Moser, Manuel
    Voigt, Christiane
    Jurkat-Witschas, Tina
    Hahn, Valerian
    Mioche, Guillaume
    Jourdan, Olivier
    Dupuy, Regis
    Gourbeyre, Christophe
    Schwarzenboeck, Alfons
    Lucke, Johannes
    Boose, Yvonne
    Mech, Mario
    Borrmann, Stephan
    Ehrlich, Andre
    Herber, Andreas
    Luepkes, Christof
    Wendisch, Manfred
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2023, 23 (13) : 7257 - 7280
  • [10] Intercomparison of model simulations of mixed-phase clouds observed during the ARM Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment. II: Multilayer cloud
    Morrison, Hugh
    McCoy, Renata B.
    Klein, Stephen A.
    Xie, Shaocheng
    Luo, Yali
    Avramov, Alexander
    Chen, Mingxuan
    Cole, Jason N. S.
    Falk, Michael
    Foster, Michael J.
    Del Genio, Anthony D.
    Harrington, Jerry Y.
    Hoose, Corinna
    Khairoutdinov, Marat F.
    Larson, Vincent E.
    Liu, Xiaohong
    McFarquhar, Greg M.
    Poellot, Michael R.
    von Salzen, Knut
    Shipway, Ben J.
    Shupe, Matthew D.
    Sud, Yogesh C.
    Turner, David D.
    Veron, Dana E.
    Walker, Gregory K.
    Wang, Zhien
    Wolf, Audrey B.
    Xu, Kuan-Man
    Yang, Fanglin
    Zhang, Gong
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2009, 135 (641) : 1003 - 1019