Systematic review and meta-analysis of developmental assets scales: A study protocol for psychometric properties

被引:0
|
作者
Habibi Asgarabad, Mojtaba [1 ]
Salehi Yegaei, Pardis [2 ]
Trejos-Castillo, Elizabeth [3 ,4 ]
Seyed Yaghoubi Pour, Nazanin [5 ]
Wiium, Nora [6 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Psychol, Trondheim, Norway
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
[3] Iran Univ Med Sci, Tehran Inst Psychiat, Sch Behav Sci & Mental Hlth, Dept Hlth Psychol, Tehran, Iran
[4] Texas Tech Univ, Human Dev & Family Sci, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[5] Univ Tabriz, Fac Educ & Psychol, Dept Psychol, Tabriz, Iran
[6] Univ Bergen, Fac Psychol, Dept Psychosocial Sci, Bergen, Norway
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 09期
关键词
POSITIVE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT; COSMIN; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0309909
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and aims Application of developmental assets, one of existing Positive Youth Development (PYD) frameworks, has gained momentum in research, policy formulations, and interventions, necessitating the introduction of the most efficient scales for this framework. The present study protocol aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of developmental assets scales to document the underlying logic, objectives, and methodologies earmarked for the identification, selection, and critical evaluation of these scales.Methods and materials In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P), the intended search will encompass databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and PsycINFO, spanning from the inception of 1988 to 1st of April 2024. The review will include articles published published in English language focusing on individuals aged 10 to 29 years and reporting at least one type of reliability or validity of developmental assets scales. The review process will be in compliance with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN), and the overall quality of evidence will be determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) guidelines.Discussion This comprehensive assessment aims to identify potential biases in prior research and offer guidance to scholars regarding the optimal scales for developmental assets in terms of validity, reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability The evidence-based appraisal of the scales strengths and limitations is imperative in shaping future research, enhancing their methodological rigor, and proposing refinements to existing instruments for developmental assets.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Acupressure for insomnia A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Dong-Jie
    Dong, Hai-Cheng
    Tang, Tsz-Nga
    Zhu, Shi-Feng
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (45)
  • [22] Porridge for influenza: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sun, Haoxiang
    Mei, Manxue
    Xu, Jiayu
    Chen, Xiaofang
    Zhu, Wei
    Song, Jianping
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (46) : E31473
  • [23] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Examining the Psychometric Evaluations of Disordered Eating Scales in Adults Living With Gastrointestinal Conditions
    Soliman, Olivia Marie
    Mikocka-Walus, Antonina
    Warner, Molly M.
    Skvarc, David
    Olive, Lisa
    Knowles, Simon R.
    NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2025,
  • [24] A systematic review of Tuina for cervical hypertension: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guan, Hongyi
    Zhu, Haiyu
    Gao, Jiaxin
    Ding, Tingwei
    Wu, Qin
    Bi, Yunpeng
    Wang, Yufeng
    Wu, Xingquan
    Song, Bailin
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (40) : E30699
  • [25] A Systematic Review of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Moderate to Severe Dementia: A Study Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Na, Riyoung
    Kim, You Joung
    Kim, Kiwon
    Kim, Ki Woong
    PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2018, 15 (04) : 417 - 423
  • [26] Psychometric Properties of Apathy Scales in Dementia: A Systematic Review
    Mohammad, Dana
    Ellis, Courtney
    Rau, Allison
    Rosenberg, Paul B.
    Mintzer, Jacobo
    Ruthirakuhan, Myuri
    Herrmann, Nathan
    Lanctot, Krista L.
    JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE, 2018, 66 (03) : 1065 - 1082
  • [27] Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of Hardiness Scales: A Systematic Review
    Nia, Hamid Sharif
    Froelicher, Erika Sivarajan
    Hosseini, Lida
    Farahani, Mansoureh Ashghali
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [28] Mindfulness for internet use disorder: a study protocol of a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fendel, Johannes Caspar
    Schmidt, Stefan
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [29] Systematic review and meta-analysis of global birth prevalence of clubfoot: a study protocol
    Ansar, Adnan
    Rahman, Ahmed Ehsanur
    Romero, Lorena
    Haider, Mohammad Rifat
    Rahman, Mohammad Masudur
    Moinuddin, Md
    Siddique, Md Abu Bakkar
    Al Mamun, Md
    Mazumder, Tapas
    Pirani, Shafique Pyarali
    Mathias, Richard Gordon
    El Arifeen, Shams
    Hoque, Dewan Md Emdadul
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [30] Antibiotic treatment for ocular toxoplasmosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis: study protocol
    John E. Feliciano-Alfonso
    Andrés Vargas-Villanueva
    María Alejandra Marín
    Laura Triviño
    Natalia Carvajal
    Manuela Moreno
    Tatiana Luna
    Clara Lopez de Mesa
    Juliana Muñoz-Ortiz
    Alejandra de-la-Torre
    Systematic Reviews, 8