Reasons for teachers' successful development of a formative assessment practice through professional development - a motivation perspective

被引:43
作者
Andersson, Catarina [1 ]
Palm, Torulf [1 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Umea Math Educ Res Ctr, Dept Sci & Math Educ, Umea, Sweden
关键词
Formative assessment; assessment for learning; professional development; motivation; expectancy-value theory; ACHIEVEMENT; IMPLEMENTATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/0969594X.2018.1430685
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Formative assessment has been shown to have the potential to significantly enhance student achievement, but a strong research base about how to support teachers to implement such a practice is lacking. This is particularly so for a conceptualisation of formative assessment as a unity of integrated formative assessment strategies. The aim of this study is to investigate why the mathematics teachers who participated in a successful professional development programme in formative assessment developed their formative classroom practice to such an extent that it had a significant impact on student achievement. An analysis of data from teacher questionnaires and interviews shows that the teachers' actions can be explained by expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Characteristics of the professional development programme that the teachers experienced as important for their development of a formative classroom practice are identified, and the characteristics' affordances for the development of the teachers' expectancy and value beliefs are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:576 / 597
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Andersson C., 2017, Education Inquiry, V8, P104, DOI DOI 10.1080/20004508.2016
[2]   The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: A study of the effects of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development programme [J].
Andersson, Catarina ;
Palm, Torulf .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2017, 49 :92-102
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation
[5]  
[Anonymous], PRACTICAL ASSESSMENT
[6]  
Arter J., 2009, AERA 2009 DIV S JCSE, DOI [10.1177/019263650108562107, DOI 10.1177/019263650108562107]
[7]  
Baird J., 2014, State of the field review: Assessment and learning
[8]  
Bell C., 2008, ANN M NAT COUNC MEAS
[9]   Formative assessment: a critical review [J].
Bennett, Randy .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (01) :5-25
[10]  
Black P., 1998, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, V5, P7, DOI [10.1080/0969595980050102, DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102]