Nurse's Spiritual Sensitivity Scale (NSSS): A Validity and Reliability Study in Turkey

被引:0
|
作者
Tektas, Pinar [1 ]
Sahan, Seda [2 ]
机构
[1] Izmir Bakircay Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Psychiat Nursing, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Izmir Bakircay Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing Fundamentals, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
Nurses; Spiritual care; Spiritual sensitivity; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/s10943-024-02109-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Nurses carry out spiritual care based on ethical principles, and they must have spiritual sensitivity to meet spiritual care needs. Seen from this angle, it is important to determine nurse's spiritual sensitivity in order to meet patient's spiritual care needs, to increase patient-nurse communication and to adopt a holistic approach to care. For this reason, the aim of this study was to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish Nurse's Spiritual Sensitivity Scale. In the present study, a sample size of 207 nurses was reached in the data collection stage. The Turkish Nurse's Spiritual Sensitivity Scale (NSSS) is a Likert-type scale consisting of 20 items and a single factor. There are no reverse-scored statements on the scale. A score of zero shows no spiritual sensitivity, and four shows higher spiritual sensitivity. The minimum score on the scale is zero, and the maximum score is 80. It was seen in this study that the Nurse's Spiritual Sensitivity Scale is a valid and reliable measurement instrument for a Turkish sample. This scale can be used by professionals to determine the spiritual sensitivity of Turkish nurses.
引用
收藏
页码:3846 / 3861
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development of the compliance with mechanical ventilator scale in: A validity and reliability study
    Pazar, Berrin
    Savas, Hafize
    Turgut, Sadik
    Dal, Hayriye Cankar
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2024,
  • [22] The Scale of Positive and Negative Experience: a validity and reliability study for adolescents
    Telef, Bulent Baki
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 14 (01): : 62 - 68
  • [23] The Turkish version of the Handover Evaluation Scale: A validity and reliability study
    Tuna, Rujnan
    Dalli, Birsen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (06)
  • [24] The Turkish adaptation of the compassionate communication scale: A validity and reliability study
    Ibrahimoglu, Ozlem
    Mersin, Sevinc
    Caglar, Merve
    PERSPECTIVES IN PSYCHIATRIC CARE, 2021, 57 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [25] DEVELOPMENT OF HEALTHCARE DEMAND PROCRASTINATION SCALE: A RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY STUDY
    Soyler, Sait
    Uyar, Seda
    Kirac, Ramazan
    Yilmaz, Goksel
    kirac, Fatma Ciftci
    JOURNAL OF BASIC AND CLINICAL HEALTH SCIENCES, 2022, 6 (02): : 283 - 292
  • [26] The reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) in older adults with foot disorders
    Navarro-Flores, Emmanuel
    de Bengoa Vallejo, Ricardo Becerro
    Elena Losa-Iglesias, Marta
    Palomo-Lopez, Patricia
    Calvo-Lobo, Cesar
    Lopez-Lopez, Daniel
    Maria Martinez-Jimenez, Eva
    Romero-Morales, Carlos
    AGING-US, 2020, 12 (24): : 24623 - 24632
  • [27] Assessing the validity and reliability of family factors on physical activity: A case study in Turkey
    Steenson, Sharalyn
    Ozcebe, Hilal
    Arslan, Umut
    Unlu, Hande Konsuk
    Araz, Ogur M.
    Yardim, Mahmut
    Uner, Sarp
    Bilir, Nazmi
    Huang, Terry T-K
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (06):
  • [28] The Nurse Spiritual Care Therapeutics Scale and Patient Beliefs in Indonesia: A Developmental Psychometric Study
    Usman, Suharno
    Taylor, Elizabeth Johnston
    JOURNAL OF RELIGION & HEALTH, 2025,
  • [29] Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Women's Toileting Behavior Scale
    So, Aeyoung
    De Gagne, Jennie C.
    Park, Sunah
    INTERNATIONAL NEUROUROLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 23 (02) : 151 - 160
  • [30] Development of the Hostility n Pandemic Scale (HPS): A Validity and Reliability Study
    Tunc, Emine Burcu
    Parlak, Simel
    Uluman, Muge
    Eryigit, Derya
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2021, 8 (03): : 475 - 486