Interaction Length Analysis of Hypersonic Shock-Boundary-Layer Interaction Including High-Enthalpy Effects

被引:1
作者
Rathi, Harsha [1 ]
Sinha, Krishnendu [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol, Dept Aerospace Engn, Mumbai 400 076, Maharashtra, India
关键词
Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes; Turbulence Models; Computational Fluid Dynamics; shock waves; high enthalpy; interaction length; separation bubble; SBLI scaling; Shock Boundary Layer Interaction; Hypersonic SBLI; LOW-FREQUENCY UNSTEADINESS; SKIN-FRICTION; SEPARATION; SIMULATION; MOTION; FLOW;
D O I
10.2514/1.J064204
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Shock-induced flow separation plays an important role in practical applications of hypersonic flows, like intake unstart and unsteady aeroelastic phenomena. The size of the shock-boundary-layer interaction (SBLI) region determines the extent of choking in engine inlet ducts. Recent scaling studies have shown that interaction length is a function of shock-induced pressure jump, upstream Mach number, Reynolds number, wall heating/cooling, and flow deflection angle at the shock wave. In this work, we analyze the interaction length scaling for different hypersonic SBLI cases at varying flow enthalpies. We perform Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations, using a shock-strength-dependent turbulence model, of hypersonic SBLI flows over a range of Mach numbers and at flow enthalpies where vibrational nonequilibrium starts to be important. The numerical results closely match the experimental data, validating the RANS predictions. The size of the separation bubble in such high-enthalpy cases is found to not follow the known scaling relations. We propose a modified scaling that collapses a wide range of hypersonic Mach numbers and freestream enthalpy conditions. We also derive the high-Mach-number limit to demonstrate that wall cooling/heating and geometry are the main factors affecting the size of the SBLI region in hypersonic flows.
引用
收藏
页码:4500 / 4517
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Anderson J. D., 2019, HYPERSONIC HIGH TEMP, P39
[2]   Heat transfer and wall temperature effects in shock wave turbulent boundary layer interactions [J].
Bernardini, M. ;
Asproulias, I. ;
Larsson, J. ;
Pirozzoli, S. ;
Grasso, F. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2016, 1 (08)
[3]  
Blottner F., 1971, Sandia Lab. TR SC-RR-70-754, DOI [10.2172/4658539, DOI 10.2172/4658539]
[4]   Low-Frequency Unsteadiness of Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions [J].
Clemens, Noel T. ;
Narayanaswamy, Venkateswaran .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FLUID MECHANICS, VOL 46, 2014, 46 :469-492
[5]   Unsteadiness in shock wave boundary layer interactions with separation [J].
Dussauge, JP ;
Dupont, P ;
Debiève, JF .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 10 (02) :85-91
[6]  
Eckert E., 1956, T AM SOC MECH ENG, V78, P1273, DOI [10.1115/1.4014011, DOI 10.1115/1.4014011]
[7]   TURBULENT HYPERSONIC FLOW AT A WEDGE-COMPRESSION CORNER [J].
ELFSTROM, GM .
JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 1972, 53 (MAY9) :113-&
[8]   CORRELATION OF SEPARATION SHOCK MOTION WITH PRESSURE-FLUCTUATIONS IN THE INCOMING BOUNDARY-LAYER [J].
ERENGIL, ME ;
DOLLING, DS .
AIAA JOURNAL, 1991, 29 (11) :1868-1877
[9]   Progress in shock wave/boundary layer interactions [J].
Gaitonde, Datta V. .
PROGRESS IN AEROSPACE SCIENCES, 2015, 72 :80-99
[10]   Large eddy simulation of two separated hypersonic shock/turbulent boundary layer interactions [J].
Helm, Clara M. ;
Martin, M. P. .
PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2022, 7 (07)