Waste heat recovery of a combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle for gas turbine based multi-generation hydrogen and freshwater purposes: 4E comparison with a simple coupled Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle

被引:7
作者
Zoghi, Mohammad [1 ]
Hosseinzadeh, Nasser [2 ]
Gharaie, Saleh [1 ]
Zare, Ali [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Engn, Geelong, Vic 3216, Australia
[2] Energy Queensland, Network Connect, Dept Renewables & Distributed Energy, Townsville, Australia
关键词
Brayton cycle; Inverse Brayton cycle; Multi-generation; Performance comparison; 4E study; ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS; THERMOECONOMIC OPTIMIZATION; REGENERATIVE BRAYTON; POWER; EXERGY; ENERGY; SYSTEM; ELECTROLYZER;
D O I
10.1016/j.tsep.2024.102718
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Using gas turbine cycles in power generation layouts can lead to a significant amount of waste energy. The combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycle (IBC), which are used in such systems, has a considerable amount of waste energy in the heat rejection stage and exhausted gas, which has not been considered in previous studies. In the present research, a simple coupled Brayton and IBC (Configuration 1) is compared with a multi -generation system (Configuration 2) in which a hot water unit, a thermoelectric generator (TEG), and an absorption chiller are added to Configuration 1 for the waste energy utilization of combined Brayton and IBC. Furthermore, the power produced in IBC and TEG is directed to a proton exchange membrane electrolyzer and a reverse osmosis desalination unit for hydrogen and potable water outputs. Results show that although the total investment cost rate of Configuration 2 is higher than that of Configuration 1, the fuel cost rate, environmental cost rate, and exergy destruction cost rate of Configuration 2 are lower. Furthermore, at the best performance point, Configuration 2 has exergy efficiency and unit cost of products equal to 40.77% and 63.19 $/GJ. They are higher than Configuration 1 by 5% and 2%, respectively. Hence, with Configuration 2, a higher exergy efficiency with a lower fuel consumption and environmental cost rate is accessible.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Abrosimov K, 2020, ENERGY, V211, DOI [10.1016/j.energy.2020.118406, 10.1016/j.cnergy.2020.118406]
[2]   Simulation of combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycles [J].
Agnew, B ;
Anderson, A ;
Potts, I ;
Frost, TH ;
Alabdoadaim, MA .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2003, 23 (08) :953-963
[3]   Exergy, exergoeconomic and environmental analyses and evolutionary algorithm based multi-objective optimization of combined cycle power plants [J].
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Rosen, Marc A. .
ENERGY, 2011, 36 (10) :5886-5898
[4]   Performance analysis of combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycles and developed configurations [J].
Alabdoadaim, M. A. ;
Agnew, B. ;
Potts, I. .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 26 (14-15) :1448-1454
[5]   Soft computing based optimization of a novel solar heliostat integrated energy system using artificial neural networks [J].
Alirahmi, S. Mojtaba ;
Khoshnevisan, A. ;
Shirazi, P. ;
Ahmadi, P. ;
Kari, D. .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2022, 50
[6]   Energy, exergy and parametric analysis of a combined cycle power plant [J].
Aliyu, Mansur ;
AlQudaihi, Ahmad B. ;
Said, Syed A. M. ;
Habib, Mohamed A. .
THERMAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2020, 15
[7]   Thermo-economic optimization of low-grade waste heat recovery in Yazd combined-cycle power plant (Iran) by a CO2 transcritical Rankine cycle [J].
Amini, Ali ;
Mirkhani, Nima ;
Pourfard, Pedram Pakjesm ;
Ashjaee, Mehdi ;
Khodkar, Mohammad Amin .
ENERGY, 2015, 86 :74-84
[8]   Multi-objective optimization of a proposed multi-generation cycle based on Pareto diagrams: Performance improvement, cost reduction, and CO2 emissions [J].
Anvari, Simin ;
Mahian, Omid ;
Solomin, Evgeny ;
Wongwises, Somchai ;
Desideri, Umberto .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2021, 45
[9]  
Bejan A., 1995, THERMAL DESIGN OPTIM
[10]   Multi-objective thermodynamic optimization of combined Brayton and inverse Brayton cycles using genetic algorithms [J].
Besarati, S. M. ;
Atashkari, K. ;
Jamali, A. ;
Hajiloo, A. ;
Nariman-Zadeh, N. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 51 (01) :212-217