Minimum 2-Year Outcomes of a Modern Monoblock Titanium Fluted Tapered Revision Stem for Complex Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Alqahtani, Yousef [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Somerville, Lyndsay E. [3 ,4 ]
Vasarhelyi, Edward M. [3 ,4 ]
Howard, James L. [3 ,4 ]
Lanting, Brent A. [3 ,4 ]
Naudie, Douglas D. R. [3 ,4 ]
MacDonald, Steven J. [3 ,4 ]
McCalden, Richard W. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, London, ON, Canada
[2] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Hip & Knee Adult Reconstruct, London, ON, Canada
[3] London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON, Canada
[4] Western Univ, Schulich Sch Med & Dent, Dept Surg, Div Orthopaed Surg, London, ON, Canada
关键词
revision total hip arthroplasty; outcomes; titanium fluted tapered stems; monoblock stems; survival; CONSIDERABLE BONE LOSS; POROUS-COATED STEMS; TERM FOLLOW-UP; FEMORAL REVISION; FIXATION; PROSTHESIS; CEMENTLESS; DIFFERENCE; STABILITY; FACE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.035
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Modular titanium fluted tapered (TFT) stems have demonstrated excellent clinical success for femoral revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) surgery. This study reports the short-term outcomes of a novel modern monoblock TFT stem used for revision and complex primary THA with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Methods: We identified 126 patients who received a single monoblock TFT stem: 26 patients for complex THA (failed fracture fixation) and 100 patients for revision THA. The reasons for revision THA included 40 for previous periprosthetic joint infection, 42 for aseptic loosening, 9 for trunnionosis, and 9 for peri-prosthetic fractures. The Paprosky grading for femoral bone loss at the time of surgery and the measured subsidence of femoral stems at 3-month follow-up were determined. We evaluated the number and indications for reoperations. Results: The mean time from surgery was 3.9 years (range, 2.0 to 6.9). A paired t-test analysis showed significant improvement from preoperative versus postoperative clinical outcome scores (P < .001) for Harris Hip Score (38.76 +/- 15.24 versus 83.42 +/- 15.38), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (45.6 +/- 19.0 versus 69.9 +/- 21.3), Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Physical component (31.7 +/- 8.1 versus 37.8 +/- 11.3), and Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey Mental component (48.2 +/- 12.2 versus 51.6 +/- 12.5). The Paprosky grading for femoral bone loss was Grade 1 (3.9%), Grade 2 (35.7%), Grade 3A (47.6%), Grade 3B (11.1%), and Grade 4 (1.6%) cases. There were 18 reoperations (14.7%), with 13 for peri-prosthetic joint infection (7 treated with implant retention and 6 treated with a 2-stage revision), 4 for instability, and 1 for acetabular aseptic loosening. There were no aseptic failures of the stem. Conclusions: This novel modern monoblock TFT stem provided reliable femoral fixation and has increasingly supplanted the use of modular TFT stems for complex primary and revision surgery in our institution. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S208 / S212
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tapered, Fluted, Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Zitsch, Bradford p.
    Byrd, Jay j.
    Buckner, Brandt
    Konigsberg, Beau s.
    Hartman, Curtis w.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2025, 48 (02) : 79 - 86
  • [2] What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Huang, Yong
    Zhou, Yixin
    Shao, Hongyi
    Gu, Jianming
    Tang, Hao
    Tang, Qiheng
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (10) : 3108 - 3113
  • [3] Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Monoblock Splined Tapered Grit-Blasted Titanium Stem
    Hellman, Michael D.
    Kearns, Sean M.
    Bohl, Daniel D.
    Haughom, Bryan D.
    Levine, Brett R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (12) : 3698 - 3703
  • [4] Early clinical and radiological outcomes of a new tapered fluted titanium monobloc revision stem in hip arthroplasty
    Moriarty, Peter
    Vles, Georges
    Haddad, Fares
    Konan, Sujith
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2021, 141 (06) : 1065 - 1071
  • [5] Femoral Bone Remodeling in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with Use of Modular Compared with Monoblock Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems The Role of Stem Length and Stiffness
    Huang, Yong
    Shao, Hongyi
    Zhou, Yixin
    Gu, Jianming
    Tang, Hao
    Yang, Dejin
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (06) : 531 - 538
  • [6] Implant breakage and revision factors for modular fluted tapered stems in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Lucena, Thibaut
    Cavaignac, Etienne
    Courtot, Louis
    Marot, Vincent
    Chiron, Philippe
    Reina, Nicolas
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2024, 34 (02) : 207 - 214
  • [7] Role and results of tapered fluted modular titanium stems in revision total hip arthroplasty
    Munro, J. T.
    Garbuz, D. S.
    Masri, B. A.
    Duncan, C. P.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2012, 94B (11): : 58 - 60
  • [8] Minimum 2-Year Outcomes of a Novel 3D-printed Fully Porous Titanium Acetabular Shell in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty
    Berlinberg, Elyse J.
    Kavian, J. Abraham
    Roof, Mackenzie A.
    Shichman, Ittai
    Frykberg, Brett
    Lutes, William B.
    Schnaser, Erik A.
    Jones, Stephen A.
    Mccalden, Richard W.
    Schwarzkopf, Ran
    ARTHROPLASTY TODAY, 2022, 18 : 39 - 44
  • [9] Mid term results with the curved modular tapered, fluted titanium Revitan stem in revision hip replacement
    Fink, B.
    Urbansky, K.
    Schuster, P.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B (07) : 889 - 895
  • [10] Revision total hip arthroplasty with a modular tapered stem
    Lakstein, Dror
    Kosashvili, Yona
    Backstein, David
    Safir, Oleg
    Lee, Paul
    Gross, Allan E.
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 20 (02) : 136 - 142