Holistic Analysis of the Impact of Power Generation Plants in Mexico during Their Life Cycle

被引:1
作者
Flores, Diana L. Ovalle [1 ]
Gallardo, Rafael Pena [1 ]
Hernandez, Elvia R. Palacios [2 ]
Montalvo, Carlos Soubervielle [1 ]
Castro, Adalberto Ospino [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma San Luis Potosi, Fac Ingn, Manuel Nava 8,Zona Univ, San Luis Potosi 78290, Mexico
[2] Univ Autonoma San Luis Potosi, Fac Ciencias, Av Chapultepec 1570,Privadas Pedregal, San Luis Potosi 78295, Mexico
[3] Univ Costa, Dept Energia, Calle 58 55 66, Barranquilla 080002, Colombia
关键词
analytical hierarchy process; energy planning; LCA; MCDM; renewable energy; sustainability; RENEWABLE ENERGY; ELECTRICITY;
D O I
10.3390/su16167041
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper assesses the environmental, technical, economic, and social impacts of the main energy generation technologies currently used in Mexico. The study used a life-cycle assessment and a multi-criteria decision-making method. The Analytical Hierarchy Process was employed to assess the social, technical, and economic impacts, while the life-cycle assessment examined the environmental effects. This study innovates the way of analyzing power plants since it provides a classification of these technologies considering different aspects, and the rankings can be obtained for each criterion and in a holistic way. According to the study's findings, photovoltaics and nuclear power plants are the most environmentally friendly options for Mexico. Considering the economic aspects, solar and wind energy are classified as the best technologies for the country. From a technical point of view, the best power plants are combined cycle and thermoelectric plants. The power plants most accepted by society are efficient cogeneration and turbo gas. Finally, the overall ranking from the experts' perspective for the development of Mexico shows that the best technologies are combined cycle and hydroelectric, with 14% and 12% acceptance, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life cycle cost profitability of biomass power plants in South Africa within the international context
    Visser, Henning
    Thopil, George Alex
    Brent, Alan
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2019, 139 : 9 - 21
  • [32] Life cycle cost analysis of wind power considering stochastic uncertainties
    Li, Chiao-Ting
    Peng, Huei
    Sun, Jing
    ENERGY, 2014, 75 : 411 - 418
  • [33] An environmental and economic evaluation of the lignite power generation system by using the life cycle analysis principles
    Kourkoumpas, Dimitrios-Sotirios
    Stamatiou, Georgios
    Karellas, Sotirios
    Grammelis, Panagiotis
    Kakaras, Emmanuel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2017, 13 (3-4) : 296 - 329
  • [34] Environmental impact on the life cycle for turbine based biomass CHP plants
    Bartocci, Pietro
    Bidini, Gianni
    Laranci, Paolo
    Zampilli, Mauro
    D'Amico, Michele
    Fantozzi, Francesco
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME TURBO EXPO: TURBOMACHINERY TECHNICAL CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 2018, VOL 3, 2018,
  • [35] A life cycle environmental sustainability analysis of microbial protein production via power-to-food approaches
    Sillman, J.
    Uusitalo, V.
    Ruuskanen, V.
    Ojala, L.
    Kahiluoto, H.
    Soukka, R.
    Ahola, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (11) : 2190 - 2203
  • [36] Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Trough and Tower Concentrating Solar Power Electricity Generation
    Burkhardt, John J., III
    Heath, Garvin
    Cohen, Elliot
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2012, 16 : S93 - S109
  • [37] Life cycle assessment and environmental cost accounting of coal-fired power generation in China
    Wang, Jinman
    Wang, Ruogu
    Zhu, Yucheng
    Li, Jiayan
    ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 115 : 374 - 384
  • [38] Comparative life cycle assessment of micro water Turbines: Evaluating potential for remote power generation
    Uniyal, Vipin
    Karn, Ashish
    Singh, Varun Pratap
    SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2025, 73
  • [39] Life cycle co2 emission analysis of hydrogen storage and battery for wind power generation
    Usui T.
    Hondo H.
    Nihon Enerugi Gakkaishi/Journal of the Japan Institute of Energy, 2010, 89 (06): : 551 - 561
  • [40] Life cycle assessment of geothermal power generation technologies: An updated review
    Tomasini-Montenegro, C.
    Santoyo-Castelazo, E.
    Gujba, H.
    Romero, R. J.
    Santoyo, E.
    APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 114 : 1119 - 1136