Outcomes and Complications of Limbal Stem Cell Allograft Transplantation

被引:4
|
作者
Li, Jennifer Y. [1 ]
Cortina, Maria S. [2 ]
Greiner, Mark A. [3 ]
Kuo, Anthony N. [4 ]
Miller, Darby D. [5 ]
Shtein, Roni M. [6 ]
Veldman, Peter B. [7 ]
Yin, Jia [8 ]
Kim, Stephen J. [9 ]
Shen, Joanne F. [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, UC Davis Eye Ctr, Davis, CA USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Carver Coll Med, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Iowa City, IA USA
[4] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Durham, NC USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, Jacksonville, FL USA
[6] Univ Michigan, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[7] Univ Chicago, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Chicago, IL USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Ophthalmol, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA USA
[9] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Nashville, TN USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Dept Ophthalmol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
关键词
limbal stem cell deficiency fi ciency disease; stem cell transplantation; conjunctival limbal autograft; keratolimbal allografts; living related conjunctival allograft; AMNIOTIC MEMBRANE TRANSPLANTATION; LONG-TERM OUTCOMES; KERATOLIMBAL ALLOGRAFT; KERATOPLASTY; SECONDARY; EYES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.02.018
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To review the published literature on the safety and outcomes of keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) transplantation and living-related conjunctival limbal allograft (lr-CLAL) transplantation for bilateral severe/total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). Methods: Literature searches were last conducted in the PubMed database in February 2023 and were limited to the English language. They yielded 523 citations; 76 were reviewed in full text, and 21 met the inclusion criteria. Two studies were rated level II, and the remaining 19 studies were rated level III. There were no level I studies. Results: After KLAL surgery, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved in 42% to 92% of eyes at final follow-up (range, 12-95 months). The BCVA was unchanged in 17% to 39% of eyes and decreased in 8% to 29% of eyes. Two of 14 studies that evaluated the results of KLAL reported a notable decline in visual acuity over time postoperatively. Survival of KLAL was variable, ranging from 21% to 90% at last follow-up (range, 12-95 months) and decreased over time. For patients undergoing lr-CLAL surgery, BCVA improved in 31% to 100% of eyes at final follow-up (range, 16-49 months). Of the 9 studies evaluating lr-CLAL, 4 reported BCVA unchanged in 30% to 39% of patients, and 3 reported a decline in BCVA in 8% to 10% of patients. The survival rate of lr-CLAL ranged from 50% to 100% at final follow-up (range, 16-49 months). The most common complications were postoperative elevation of intraocular pressure, persistent epithelial defects, and acute allograft immune rejections. Conclusions: Given limited options for patients with bilateral LSCD, both KLAL and lr-CLAL are viable choices that may provide improvement of vision and ocular surface findings. The studies trend toward a lower rejection rate and graft failure with lr-CLAL. However, the level and duration of immunosuppression vary widely between the studies and may impact allograft rejections and long-term graft survival. Complications related to immunosuppression are minimal. Repeat surgery may be needed to maintain a viable ocular surface. Reasonable long-term success can be achieved with both KLAL and lr-CLAL with appropriate systemic immunosuppression. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology 2024;131:1121-1131 (c) 2024 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1131
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Keratolimbal allograft for limbal stem cell deficiency after severe corneal chemical injury: a systematic review
    Shanbhag, Swapna S.
    Saeed, Hajirah N.
    Paschalis, Eleftherios I.
    Chodosh, James
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2018, 102 (08) : 1114 - 1121
  • [42] Characterization of the Corneal Surface in Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency and after Transplantation of Cultivated Limbal Epithelium
    Pauklin, Mikk
    Steuhl, Klaus-P.
    Meller, Daniel
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2009, 116 (06) : 1048 - 1056
  • [43] Oral Mucosal Graft With Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for Total Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
    Liu, Jingbo
    Sheha, Hosam
    Fu, Yao
    Giegengack, Matthew
    Tseng, Scheffer C. G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 152 (05) : 739 - 747
  • [44] Outcomes of surgical interventions for the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency
    Ganger, Anita
    Singh, Archita
    Kalaivani, M.
    Gupta, Noopur
    Vanathi, Murugesan
    Mohanty, Sujata
    Tandon, Radhika
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 154 (01) : 51 - 61
  • [45] Fibrin Glue-Assisted Sutureless Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation Surgery for the Treatment of Severe Ocular Chemical Injury
    Sonmez, Baris
    Beden, Umit
    CORNEA, 2011, 30 (03) : 296 - 300
  • [46] Amniotic membrane transplantation with and without limbal stem cell transplantation in chemical eye injury
    Kafle, P. A.
    Singh, S. K.
    Sarkar, I
    Surin, L.
    NEPALESE JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 7 (01) : 52 - 55
  • [47] Evaluation of the factors that influence surgical outcome in conjunctival-limbal allograft transplantation
    Kasikci, Murat
    Korkmaz, Ilayda
    Palamar, Melis
    Egrilmez, Sait
    Yagci, Ayse
    Selver, Ozlem Barut
    EYE, 2023, 37 (11) : 2192 - 2196
  • [48] Cardiovascular Complications of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
    Blaes A.
    Konety S.
    Hurley P.
    Current Treatment Options in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2016, 18 (4) : 1 - 10
  • [49] Limbal stem cell deficiency
    Gatinel, D
    Hoang-Xuan, T
    JOURNAL FRANCAIS D OPHTALMOLOGIE, 2000, 23 (07): : 718 - 728
  • [50] Modified Simple Limbal Epithelial Transplantation Using Cryopreseryed Amniotic Membrane for Unilateral Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
    Amescua, Guillermo
    Atallah, Marwan
    Nikpoor, Neda
    Galor, Anat
    Perez, Victor L.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 158 (03) : 469 - 475