Reducing Resource Expenditure in Value Co-Creation: A Path to Market Shaping

被引:0
作者
Lipnickas, Gediminas [1 ]
Plewa, Carolin [2 ]
Conduit, Jodie [2 ]
Wilkie, Dean [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
[2] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Business Sch, Adelaide, Australia
来源
AUSTRALASIAN MARKETING JOURNAL | 2025年 / 33卷 / 03期
关键词
market-shaping; value co-creation; resource integration; discrete choice experiment; autonomous vehicles; ride-share; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; SERVICE-DOMINANT LOGIC; VALUE COCREATION; OPTIMAL DESIGNS; HEALTH; CONJOINT; PAY; PREFERENCES; PERSPECTIVE; INTENTIONS;
D O I
10.1177/14413582241268562
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although market-shaping is typically initiated by firms, its success relies on the collective efforts of multiple market actors. Consumers play a crucial role in shaping markets, by actively engaging in activities beyond merely purchasing products. For example, in the case of ride-sharing services, early adopters actively advocated for their use, educated others on how to access them, and lobbied for regulatory changes that enabled the services to operate and scale in various markets. Through these actions, consumers helped to establish the new service offering and shape the market. Despite this significant role, there is a limited understanding of how firms can motivate consumers in practical terms. This study employs a discrete choice experiment to investigate how a firm can elicit market-shaping behaviours of consumers within the context of autonomous ride-sharing services. Identifying three distinct consumer segments with unique resource expenditure preferences in the value creation process, the study sheds light on the specific activities that drive market-shaping. While some consumers prefer reducing specific key resources, others navigate trade-offs across a broader range of resources. The findings emphasise the importance of tailored value propositions in motivating consumers to engage in behaviours that support successful market-shaping.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 324
页数:15
相关论文
共 96 条
[41]   Resource integration [J].
Kleinaltenkamp, Michael ;
Brodie, Roderick J. ;
Frow, Pennie ;
Hughes, Tim ;
Peters, Linda D. ;
Woratschek, Herbert .
MARKETING THEORY, 2012, 12 (02) :201-205
[42]  
Kozinets R.V., 2007, Consumer Tribes, P194
[43]  
Kumar N., 2000, EUR MANAG J, V18, P129, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00084-5
[44]   NEW APPROACH TO CONSUMER THEORY [J].
LANCASTER, KJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1966, 74 (02) :132-157
[45]   Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform Healthcare decision making [J].
Lancsar, Emily ;
Louviere, Jordan .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2008, 26 (08) :661-677
[46]   Reconceptualising the External Validity of Discrete Choice Experiments [J].
Lancsar, Emily ;
Swait, Joffre .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (10) :951-965
[47]   How much is enough? The role of effort in market shaping [J].
Lipnickas, Gediminas ;
Conduit, Jodie ;
Plewa, Carolin ;
Wilkie, Dean .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & INDUSTRIAL MARKETING, 2020, 35 (09) :1441-1451
[48]  
Louviere J.J., 2000, STATED CHOICE METHOD, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511753831
[49]   Designing discrete choice experiments: Do optimal designs come at a price? [J].
Louviere, Jordan J. ;
Islam, Towhidul ;
Wasi, Nada ;
Street, Deborah ;
Burgess, Leonie .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2008, 35 (02) :360-375
[50]   Comparison of importance weights and willingness-to-pay measures derived from choice-based conjoint, constant sum scales and best-worst scaling [J].
Louviere, Jordan J. ;
Islam, Towhidul .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2008, 61 (09) :903-911