Personalized Classifier Selection for EEG-Based BCIs

被引:0
作者
Anaraki, Javad Rahimipour [1 ,2 ]
Kolokolova, Antonina [3 ]
Chau, Tom [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Biomed Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada
[2] Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Bloorview Res Inst, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8, Canada
[3] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Comp Sci, St John, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
关键词
EEG data; classification; algorithm portfolio; brain-computer interface;
D O I
10.3390/computers13070158
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The most important component of an Electroencephalogram (EEG) Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is its classifier, which translates EEG signals in real time into meaningful commands. The accuracy and speed of the classifier determine the utility of the BCI. However, there is significant intra- and inter-subject variability in EEG data, complicating the choice of the best classifier for different individuals over time. There is a keen need for an automatic approach to selecting a personalized classifier suited to an individual's current needs. To this end, we have developed a systematic methodology for individual classifier selection, wherein the structural characteristics of an EEG dataset are used to predict a classifier that will perform with high accuracy. The method was evaluated using motor imagery EEG data from Physionet. We confirmed that our approach could consistently predict a classifier whose performance was no worse than the single-best-performing classifier across the participants. Furthermore, Kullback-Leibler divergences between reference distributions and signal amplitude and class label distributions emerged as the most important characteristics for classifier prediction, suggesting that classifier choice depends heavily on the morphology of signal amplitude densities and the degree of class imbalance in an EEG dataset.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[21]   THE PERFORMANCE PROFILE: A MULTI-CRITERIA PERFORMANCE EVALUATION METHOD FOR TEST-BASED PROBLEMS [J].
Jaskowski, Wojciech ;
Liskowski, Pawel ;
Szubert, Marcin ;
Krawiec, Krzysztof .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2016, 26 (01) :215-229
[22]   Event-related (De)synchronization (ERD/ERS) during motor imagery tasks: Implications for brain-computer interfaces [J].
Jeon, Yongwoong ;
Nam, Chang S. ;
Kim, Young-Joo ;
Whang, Min Cheol .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2011, 41 (05) :428-436
[23]   STATLOG - COMPARISON OF CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHMS ON LARGE REAL-WORLD PROBLEMS [J].
KING, RD ;
FENG, C ;
SUTHERLAND, A .
APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 9 (03) :289-333
[24]   What is the Source of the EEG? [J].
Kirschstein, Timo ;
Koehling, Ruediger .
CLINICAL EEG AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2009, 40 (03) :146-149
[25]  
Kolb B, 2011, J CAN ACAD CHILD ADO, V20
[26]  
Kotthoff L, 2019, SPRING SER CHALLENGE, P81, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-05318-5_4
[27]   Portfolios of Subgraph Isomorphism Algorithms [J].
Kotthoff, Lars ;
McCreesh, Ciaran ;
Solnon, Christine .
LEARNING AND INTELLIGENT OPTIMIZATION (LION 10), 2016, 10079 :107-122
[28]   ON INFORMATION AND SUFFICIENCY [J].
KULLBACK, S ;
LEIBLER, RA .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1951, 22 (01) :79-86
[29]   EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces [J].
Lawhern, Vernon J. ;
Solon, Amelia J. ;
Waytowich, Nicholas R. ;
Gordon, Stephen M. ;
Hung, Chou P. ;
Lance, Brent J. .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 15 (05)
[30]  
Leyton-Brown K, 2003, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V2833, P899