Personalized Classifier Selection for EEG-Based BCIs

被引:0
作者
Anaraki, Javad Rahimipour [1 ,2 ]
Kolokolova, Antonina [3 ]
Chau, Tom [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Inst Biomed Engn, Toronto, ON M5S 3G9, Canada
[2] Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabil Hosp, Bloorview Res Inst, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8, Canada
[3] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Dept Comp Sci, St John, NF A1B 3X5, Canada
关键词
EEG data; classification; algorithm portfolio; brain-computer interface;
D O I
10.3390/computers13070158
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The most important component of an Electroencephalogram (EEG) Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) is its classifier, which translates EEG signals in real time into meaningful commands. The accuracy and speed of the classifier determine the utility of the BCI. However, there is significant intra- and inter-subject variability in EEG data, complicating the choice of the best classifier for different individuals over time. There is a keen need for an automatic approach to selecting a personalized classifier suited to an individual's current needs. To this end, we have developed a systematic methodology for individual classifier selection, wherein the structural characteristics of an EEG dataset are used to predict a classifier that will perform with high accuracy. The method was evaluated using motor imagery EEG data from Physionet. We confirmed that our approach could consistently predict a classifier whose performance was no worse than the single-best-performing classifier across the participants. Furthermore, Kullback-Leibler divergences between reference distributions and signal amplitude and class label distributions emerged as the most important characteristics for classifier prediction, suggesting that classifier choice depends heavily on the morphology of signal amplitude densities and the degree of class imbalance in an EEG dataset.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   A comprehensive review of EEG-based brain-computer interface paradigms [J].
Abiri, Reza ;
Borhani, Soheil ;
Sellers, Eric W. ;
Jiang, Yang ;
Zhao, Xiaopeng .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 16 (01)
[2]   Review and Classification of Emotion Recognition Based on EEG Brain-Computer Interface System Research: A Systematic Review [J].
Al-Nafjan, Abeer ;
Hosny, Manar ;
Al-Ohali, Yousef ;
Al-Wabil, Areej .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2017, 7 (12)
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Algorithmics for Hard Problems
[4]   An algorithm portfolio for the dynamic maximal covering location problem [J].
Calderin, Jenny Fajardo ;
Masegosa, Antonio D. ;
Pelta, David A. .
MEMETIC COMPUTING, 2017, 9 (02) :141-151
[5]  
Chatterjee Rajdeep, 2018, Proceedings of First International Conference on Smart System, Innovations and Computing. SSIC 2017. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies (SIST 79), P73, DOI 10.1007/978-981-10-5828-8_8
[6]   Automatic stride interval extraction from long, highly variable and noisy gait timing signals [J].
Chau, T ;
Rizvi, S .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 21 (04) :495-514
[7]   Single-Source to Single-Target Cross-Subject Motor Imagery Classification Based on Multisubdomain Adaptation Network [J].
Chen, Yi ;
Yang, Rui ;
Huang, Mengjie ;
Wang, Zidong ;
Liu, Xiaohui .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING, 2022, 30 :1992-2002
[8]   An autonomous Earth-observing sensorweb [J].
Chien, S ;
Cichy, B ;
Davies, A ;
Tran, D ;
Rabideau, G ;
Castaño, R ;
Sherwood, R ;
Mandl, D ;
Frye, S ;
Shulman, S ;
Jones, J ;
Grosvenor, S .
IEEE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2005, 20 (03) :16-24
[9]   Input-Sensitive Profiling [J].
Coppa, Emilio ;
Demetrescu, Camil ;
Finocchi, Irene .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2014, 40 (12) :1185-1205
[10]   Methods for quantifying intra- and inter-subject variability of evoked potential data applied to the multifocal visual evoked potential [J].
Dandekar, Sangita ;
Ales, Justin ;
Carney, Thom ;
Klein, Stanley A. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 2007, 165 (02) :270-286