Breast Reduction Epidemiology and Complications in Nonbinary, Transgender, and Cisgender Adults

被引:0
|
作者
Miller, Amitai S. [1 ,2 ]
Escobar-Domingo, Maria J. [3 ]
Lee, Bernard T. [3 ]
Ganor, Oren [4 ]
Lin, Samuel J. [3 ]
Hu, Sophia [5 ]
Pusic, Andrea L. [1 ,5 ]
Kaur, Manraj N. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, John Kennedy Sch Govt, Cambridge, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Boston Childrens Hosp, Dept Plast & Oral Surg, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Patient Reported Outcomes Value & Experience PROVE, Dept Surg, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Breast reduction; Complication; Nonbinary; Outcome; Transgender; Trend; GENDER-AFFIRMING MASTECTOMY; SURGERY; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jss.2024.07.079
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Research in gender-affirming chest surgery has primarily compared cisgender versus transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people, without specifically addressing nonbinary people. This study will assess surgical complications between cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary adults undergoing breast reductions. Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases from 2015 to 2021 were used to identify TGD patients who underwent breast reduction (Current Procedural Terminology code: 19318) and cisgender patients who underwent this procedure for cosmesis or cancer prophylaxis. Analysis of variance tests, chi-squared tests, unpaired t-tests, and regression models compared complications among cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary patients. Results: A total of 1222 patients met the inclusion criteria: 380 (31.1%) were cisgender, 769 (62.9%) were transgender, and 73 (6.0%) were nonbinary. The proportion of TGD patients grew significantly relative to cisgender patients over the study period (P < 0.001). The overall all-cause complication rate was 3.4%, with 4.2% of cisgender, 1.4% of nonbinary, and 3.1% of transgender patients experiencing surgical complications. After adjusting for confounding variables, no statistically significant difference was observed in all-cause complication rates between the cohorts. In the sample, 19 transgender patients (2.5%) underwent reoperation. Transgender patients had a lower likelihood of wound complications (odds ratio: 0.172; 95% confidence interval: 0.035-0.849; P = 0.031) compared to cisgender patients and nonbinary patients. None of the patients experienced a severe systemic complication. Conclusions: The findings emphasize the growing demand and safety of gender-affirming breast reductions. They underscore the importance of continued research and tailored approaches to delivering care to nonbinary and transgender patients, addressing their diverse needs and improving access to gender-affirming surgeries.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 445
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Challenging the Cisgender/Transgender Binary: Nonbinary People and the Transgender Label
    Darwin, Helana
    GENDER & SOCIETY, 2020, 34 (03) : 357 - 380
  • [2] Experiences of cisgender youth with a transgender and/or nonbinary sibling
    Godwin, Eli G.
    Moore, LB. M.
    Sansfacon, Annie Pullen
    Nishman, Melissa MacNish
    Rosal, Milagros C.
    Katz-Wise, Sabra L.
    FAMILY PROCESS, 2024, 63 (02) : 1025 - 1045
  • [3] Health Disparities Among Transgender, Nonbinary, and Cisgender Undergraduate Students
    Valen, Benjamin M.
    Orantes, Destiny
    Burke, Sara E.
    Antshel, Kevin M.
    PSYCHOLOGY OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER DIVERSITY, 2025,
  • [4] Comparing eating disorder treatment outcomes of transgender and nonbinary individuals with cisgender individuals
    Riddle, Megan C.
    Robertson, Lee
    Blalock, Dan, V
    Duffy, Alan
    Le Grange, Daniel
    Mehler, Philip S.
    Rienecke, Renee D.
    Joiner, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EATING DISORDERS, 2022, 55 (11) : 1532 - 1540
  • [5] Characteristics of Clinicians Caring for Transgender Men and Nonbinary Individuals and Guideline Concordance of Clinicians' Cervical Cancer Screening Counseling for Cisgender Individuals Versus Transgender Men and Nonbinary Individuals with a Cervix
    Mcdowell, Alex
    Rieu-Werden, Meghan L.
    Atlas, Steven J.
    Fields, Colin D.
    Goldstein, Robert H.
    Gundersen, Gabrielle D.
    Haas, Jennifer S.
    Higashi, Robin T.
    Pruitt, Sandi L.
    Silver, Michelle I.
    Tiro, Jasmin A.
    Kamineni, Aruna
    LGBT HEALTH, 2024, 11 (07) : 563 - 569
  • [6] Psychiatric Epidemiology of Transgender and Nonbinary Adult Patients at an Urban Health Center
    Beckwith, Noor
    McDowell, Michal J.
    Reisner, Sari L.
    Zaslow, Shayne
    Weiss, Roger D.
    Mayer, Kenneth H.
    Keuroghlian, Alex S.
    LGBT HEALTH, 2019, 6 (02) : 51 - 61
  • [7] The Impact of Mental Health Care Provider Website Transgender and Nonbinary Affirmation on Site User Experience for Transgender/Nonbinary and Cisgender People
    Parent, Mike C.
    Tebbe, Elliot A.
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2022, 53 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [8] The Relationship between Gender Identity and Gender Centrality among Transgender, Cisgender, Nonbinary, and Intersex Individuals
    Brashear, Brittany Rockelle
    Tillewein, Heather
    Harvey, Penny
    JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY, 2025, 72 (07) : 1310 - 1330
  • [9] Using The Companionship Model When Writing Referral Letters for Transgender and Nonbinary Adults
    Budge, Stephanie L.
    Lee, Joonwoo
    Tebbe, Elliot A.
    Dominguez Jr, Sergio
    PSYCHOLOGY OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER DIVERSITY, 2023,
  • [10] The Stench of Bathroom Bills and Anti-Transgender Legislation: Anxiety and Depression Among Transgender, Nonbinary, and Cisgender LGBQ People During a State Referendum
    Horne, Sharon G.
    McGinley, Mallaigh
    Yel, Nedim
    Maroney, Meredith R.
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 69 (01) : 1 - 13