The evolution of patient-reported outcome measures after a first lateral ankle sprain: A prospective study

被引:1
作者
Michels, Frederick [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dewyn, Tim [4 ]
Bogaerts, Kris [5 ,6 ]
De Waele, Camille [1 ]
Hamers, Delphine [1 ]
机构
[1] AZ Groeninge, Orthopaed Dept, President Kennedylaan 4, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[2] GRECMIP, Minimally Invas Foot & Ankle Soc, MIFAS, Merignac, France
[3] Univ Leuven campus Kortrijk, Fac Med, Dept Dev & Regenerat, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[4] AZ Groeninge, Dept Emergency & Sports Med, President Kennedylaan 4, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Crit Care, I BioStat, Leuven, Belgium
[6] UHasselt, I BioStat, Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
Ankle instability; Functional score; Chronic hindfoot instability; Ankle ligament; Recovery; Lateral ligaments; Recurrent sprains; Chronic pain; Residual complaints; FUNCTIONAL TREATMENT; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CAST IMMOBILIZATION; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; FIBULAR LIGAMENT; RECENT RUPTURE; INSTABILITY; VALIDATION; INJURIES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: A lateral ankle sprain is the most common musculoskeletal injury in the physically active population. However, it is unclear how the clinical condition evolves during the period after the injury and what proportion of patients develops chronic symptoms. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the evolution of patient-reported outcome measures after a first time lateral ankle sprain. Methods: A prospective clinical study assessed the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a consecutive group of 100 patients during 1 year after a first lateral ankle sprain. The Karlsson score and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)-score was assessed at 6 months, 9 months and 1 year. The difference between the time points of all scores was analysed using the positive change over time (binomial test versus 50%) and the difference in score (signed rank test). The time to sustained excellent level was also assessed overall and in several subgroups: age, gender, degree of injury (2 or 3), avulsion fracture, use of crutches, use of cast. Differences between subgroups were assessed by a generalized log-rank test. Results: All clinical scores demonstrated an improvement up to 12 months after the sprain. The median Karlsson score (interquartile range) improved from 62 (50-80) at 6 weeks to 90 (72-100) at 3 months, to 97 (82-100) at 6 months to 100 (90-100) at 9 months, to 100 (100-100) at 1 year. The analysis of positive change over time demonstrated a significant positive change (P-value < .0005) between all time points except between 6 weeks and 12 weeks when using the FAOS quality score. The difference in score demonstrated a significant change (P-value < .01) between all time points except between 36 weeks and 48 weeks when using the FAOS pain and FAOS sports score. Age and presence of an avulsion fracture were correlated with a slower recovery and worse results. At 1 year, in total 13 patients (13%) had a worse outcome corresponding to a Karlsson score < 81 or CAIT score < 24. Conclusion: The clinical condition after a first ankle sprain demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the different time points in the first year. Twelve months after a first lateral ankle sprain 13% had a fair or poor outcome. Higher age and presence of an avulsion fracture were correlated with a slower recovery and worse results. This information is useful in clinical practice to predict further progression and inform patients. Moreover, it is valuable to improve treatment strategies. Level of evidence: Level II (prospective cohort study) (c) 2024 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 575
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-reported outcomes after treatment for rectal cancer-A prospective nationwide study
    Slordahl, Kathinka Schmidt
    Balto, Aina
    Guren, Marianne Gronlie
    Wibe, Arne
    Korner, Hartwig
    Norderval, Stig
    Gjelsvik, Ylva Maria
    Myklebust, Tor Age
    Larsen, Inger Kristin
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2025, 27 (01)
  • [42] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for women with dysmenorrhea: A systematic review
    de Arruda, Guilherme Tavares
    Driusso, Patricia
    de Godoy, Amanda Garcia
    de Sousa, Ana Paula
    Avila, Mariana Arias
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (11) : 4167 - 4183
  • [43] Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in shoulder and elbow surgery
    Jessen, Malik
    Lappen, Sebastian
    Schneider, Marco
    OBERE EXTREMITAET-SCHULTER-ELLENBOGEN-HAND-UPPER EXTREMITY-SHOULDER ELBOW HAND, 2021, 16 (03): : 215 - 220
  • [44] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Voice: An Updated Readability Analysis
    Stefu, Julia
    Slavych, Bonnie K.
    Zraick, Richard I.
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2023, 37 (03) : e27 - e34
  • [45] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Neuromuscular Diseases: A Scoping Review
    Voet, Nicoline
    Pater, Ronne
    Garmendia, Joana
    Sistiaga, Andone
    Labayru, Garazi
    Gallais, Benjamin
    de Groot, Ingrid
    Muslemani, Samar
    Gagnon, Cynthia
    Graham, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES, 2024, 11 (03) : 567 - 577
  • [46] Patient-reported outcome measures in severe asthma: an expert consensus
    Martinez-Moragon, Eva
    Antepara Ercoreca, Ignacio
    Munoz Garcia, Maria
    Casas Maldonado, Francisco
    Calvin Lamas, Marta
    Chiner Vives, Eusebi
    Crespo Diz, Carlos
    Diaz-Perez, David
    Eguiluz Gracia, Ibon
    Garcia Gil, Sara
    Gonzalez-Perez, Ruperto
    Habernau Mena, Alicia
    Hermida Valverde, Tamara
    Jornet Montana, Sonia
    Lopez-Carrasco, Valentin
    Martinez Lopez, Iciar
    Merino-Bohorquez, Vicente
    Moreno-Ancillo, Alvaro
    Minguez Cabeza, Ana Cristina
    Monte-Boquet, Emilio
    Revuelta-Herrero, Jose Luis
    Sanchez-Cuellar, Silvia
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2024, 61 (06) : 619 - 631
  • [47] Readability analysis of pediatric otolaryngology patient-reported outcome measures
    Dorismond, Christina
    Farzal, Zainab
    Thompson, Nicholas J.
    Lee, Saangyoung E.
    Zdanski, Carlton J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 140
  • [48] Use of PROMs (patient-reported outcome measures) and PREMs (patient-reported experience measures) in cardiology: state of the art and applications to improve patient care
    Barisone, Michela
    Quattrone, Filippo
    Aimo, Alberto
    Damone, Anna Luce
    Pennucci, Francesca
    Emdin, Michele
    Passino, Claudio
    Nuti, Sabina
    GIORNALE ITALIANO DI CARDIOLOGIA, 2024, 25 (11) : 801 - 810
  • [49] Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Periacetabular Osteotomy
    Wasko, Marcin K.
    Yanik, Elizabeth L.
    Pascual-Garrido, Cecilia
    Clohisy, John C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2019, 101 (06)
  • [50] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Jahagirdar, Deepa
    Kroll, Thilo
    Ritchie, Karen
    Wyke, Sally
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2013, 6 (01) : 11 - 21