The evolution of patient-reported outcome measures after a first lateral ankle sprain: A prospective study

被引:1
作者
Michels, Frederick [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dewyn, Tim [4 ]
Bogaerts, Kris [5 ,6 ]
De Waele, Camille [1 ]
Hamers, Delphine [1 ]
机构
[1] AZ Groeninge, Orthopaed Dept, President Kennedylaan 4, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[2] GRECMIP, Minimally Invas Foot & Ankle Soc, MIFAS, Merignac, France
[3] Univ Leuven campus Kortrijk, Fac Med, Dept Dev & Regenerat, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[4] AZ Groeninge, Dept Emergency & Sports Med, President Kennedylaan 4, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Crit Care, I BioStat, Leuven, Belgium
[6] UHasselt, I BioStat, Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
Ankle instability; Functional score; Chronic hindfoot instability; Ankle ligament; Recovery; Lateral ligaments; Recurrent sprains; Chronic pain; Residual complaints; FUNCTIONAL TREATMENT; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CAST IMMOBILIZATION; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; FIBULAR LIGAMENT; RECENT RUPTURE; INSTABILITY; VALIDATION; INJURIES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: A lateral ankle sprain is the most common musculoskeletal injury in the physically active population. However, it is unclear how the clinical condition evolves during the period after the injury and what proportion of patients develops chronic symptoms. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the evolution of patient-reported outcome measures after a first time lateral ankle sprain. Methods: A prospective clinical study assessed the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a consecutive group of 100 patients during 1 year after a first lateral ankle sprain. The Karlsson score and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)-score was assessed at 6 months, 9 months and 1 year. The difference between the time points of all scores was analysed using the positive change over time (binomial test versus 50%) and the difference in score (signed rank test). The time to sustained excellent level was also assessed overall and in several subgroups: age, gender, degree of injury (2 or 3), avulsion fracture, use of crutches, use of cast. Differences between subgroups were assessed by a generalized log-rank test. Results: All clinical scores demonstrated an improvement up to 12 months after the sprain. The median Karlsson score (interquartile range) improved from 62 (50-80) at 6 weeks to 90 (72-100) at 3 months, to 97 (82-100) at 6 months to 100 (90-100) at 9 months, to 100 (100-100) at 1 year. The analysis of positive change over time demonstrated a significant positive change (P-value < .0005) between all time points except between 6 weeks and 12 weeks when using the FAOS quality score. The difference in score demonstrated a significant change (P-value < .01) between all time points except between 36 weeks and 48 weeks when using the FAOS pain and FAOS sports score. Age and presence of an avulsion fracture were correlated with a slower recovery and worse results. At 1 year, in total 13 patients (13%) had a worse outcome corresponding to a Karlsson score < 81 or CAIT score < 24. Conclusion: The clinical condition after a first ankle sprain demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the different time points in the first year. Twelve months after a first lateral ankle sprain 13% had a fair or poor outcome. Higher age and presence of an avulsion fracture were correlated with a slower recovery and worse results. This information is useful in clinical practice to predict further progression and inform patients. Moreover, it is valuable to improve treatment strategies. Level of evidence: Level II (prospective cohort study) (c) 2024 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 575
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Worth, Allison
    Hammersley, Victoria
    Knibb, Rebecca
    Flokstra-de-Blok, Bertine
    DunnGalvin, Audrey
    Walker, Samantha
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 24
  • [32] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Rhinitis and Chronic Rhinosinusitis
    Dykewicz, Mark S.
    Wallace, Dana V.
    Bandi, Sindhura
    Mahdavinia, Mahboobeh
    Sedaghat, Ahmad R.
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE, 2024, 12 (10) : 2574 - 2582
  • [33] Association of inpatient postpartum recovery with patient-reported outcome measures following hospital discharge: a prospective cohort study
    Stump, Carrie M.
    Peralta, Feyce M.
    Sultan, Pervez
    Holland, Michael E.
    Badreldin, Nevert
    Shepard, Lelesse C.
    McCarthy, Robert J.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [34] Outcome Metrics After Burn Injury From Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Value-Based Health Care
    Friedstat, Jonathan S.
    Ryan, Colleen M.
    Gibran, Nicole
    CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY, 2017, 44 (04) : 911 - +
  • [35] Role of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Predicting Outcome of Bunion Surgery
    MacDonald, Ashlee
    Houck, Jeff
    Baumhauer, Judith F.
    FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 41 (02) : 133 - 139
  • [36] Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review
    Wiering, Bianca
    de Boer, Dolf
    Delnoij, Diana
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2017, 20 (01) : 11 - 23
  • [37] Patient-reported outcome measures in rehabilitation after knee surgery: a rapid systematic review
    Moreira, Jose
    Miguel, Susana
    Delgado, Bruno
    Boto, Paulo
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2024,
  • [38] Patient engagement in multimorbidity: a systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures
    Barello, Serena
    Anderson, Gloria
    Bosio, Caterina
    Lane, Deirdre A.
    Leo, Donato G.
    Lobban, Trudie C. A.
    Trevisan, Caterina
    Graffigna, Guendalina
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [39] Evaluation of Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Rhinoplasty A Systematic Review
    van Zijl, Floris V. W. J.
    Mokkink, L. B.
    Haagsma, J. A.
    Datema, Frank R.
    JAMA FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 21 (02) : 152 - 162
  • [40] Applicability of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Aesthetic Medicine Patient Archetypes
    Rauch, Simonne
    De Simone, Patricia
    Bertucci, Vince
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2024, 50 (01) : 86 - 92