The evolution of patient-reported outcome measures after a first lateral ankle sprain: A prospective study

被引:1
作者
Michels, Frederick [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dewyn, Tim [4 ]
Bogaerts, Kris [5 ,6 ]
De Waele, Camille [1 ]
Hamers, Delphine [1 ]
机构
[1] AZ Groeninge, Orthopaed Dept, President Kennedylaan 4, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[2] GRECMIP, Minimally Invas Foot & Ankle Soc, MIFAS, Merignac, France
[3] Univ Leuven campus Kortrijk, Fac Med, Dept Dev & Regenerat, Etienne Sabbelaan 53, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[4] AZ Groeninge, Dept Emergency & Sports Med, President Kennedylaan 4, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[5] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Publ Hlth & Crit Care, I BioStat, Leuven, Belgium
[6] UHasselt, I BioStat, Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
Ankle instability; Functional score; Chronic hindfoot instability; Ankle ligament; Recovery; Lateral ligaments; Recurrent sprains; Chronic pain; Residual complaints; FUNCTIONAL TREATMENT; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CAST IMMOBILIZATION; ECONOMIC-EVALUATION; FIBULAR LIGAMENT; RECENT RUPTURE; INSTABILITY; VALIDATION; INJURIES; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.012
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: A lateral ankle sprain is the most common musculoskeletal injury in the physically active population. However, it is unclear how the clinical condition evolves during the period after the injury and what proportion of patients develops chronic symptoms. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the evolution of patient-reported outcome measures after a first time lateral ankle sprain. Methods: A prospective clinical study assessed the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a consecutive group of 100 patients during 1 year after a first lateral ankle sprain. The Karlsson score and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) were assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 1 year. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT)-score was assessed at 6 months, 9 months and 1 year. The difference between the time points of all scores was analysed using the positive change over time (binomial test versus 50%) and the difference in score (signed rank test). The time to sustained excellent level was also assessed overall and in several subgroups: age, gender, degree of injury (2 or 3), avulsion fracture, use of crutches, use of cast. Differences between subgroups were assessed by a generalized log-rank test. Results: All clinical scores demonstrated an improvement up to 12 months after the sprain. The median Karlsson score (interquartile range) improved from 62 (50-80) at 6 weeks to 90 (72-100) at 3 months, to 97 (82-100) at 6 months to 100 (90-100) at 9 months, to 100 (100-100) at 1 year. The analysis of positive change over time demonstrated a significant positive change (P-value < .0005) between all time points except between 6 weeks and 12 weeks when using the FAOS quality score. The difference in score demonstrated a significant change (P-value < .01) between all time points except between 36 weeks and 48 weeks when using the FAOS pain and FAOS sports score. Age and presence of an avulsion fracture were correlated with a slower recovery and worse results. At 1 year, in total 13 patients (13%) had a worse outcome corresponding to a Karlsson score < 81 or CAIT score < 24. Conclusion: The clinical condition after a first ankle sprain demonstrated a significant improvement in PROMs between the different time points in the first year. Twelve months after a first lateral ankle sprain 13% had a fair or poor outcome. Higher age and presence of an avulsion fracture were correlated with a slower recovery and worse results. This information is useful in clinical practice to predict further progression and inform patients. Moreover, it is valuable to improve treatment strategies. Level of evidence: Level II (prospective cohort study) (c) 2024 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 575
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Metrics in Cancer Rehabilitation
    Vargo, Mary M.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2023, 25 (08) : 869 - 882
  • [22] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Swallowing: A Proposed Checklist
    Shapira-Galitz, Yael
    Anderson, Amber
    Balou, Matina
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2024, 33 (05) : 2167 - 2176
  • [23] Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Metastatic Urinary Cancers
    Bergerot, Cristiane Decat
    Bergerot, Paulo Gustavo
    Philip, Errol J.
    Pal, Sumanta Kumar
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2020, 6 (01): : 26 - 30
  • [24] Patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Ramkumar, P. N.
    Harris, J. D.
    Noble, P. C.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2015, 4 (07): : 120 - 127
  • [25] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Their Clinical Applications in Dermatology
    Snyder, Ashley M.
    Chen, Suephy C.
    Chren, Mary-Margaret
    Ferris, Laura K.
    Edwards, LaVar D.
    Swerlick, Robert A.
    Flint, Nicholas D.
    Cizik, Amy M.
    Hess, Rachel
    Kean, Jacob
    Secrest, Aaron M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DERMATOLOGY, 2023, 24 (04) : 499 - 511
  • [26] Patient-reported outcome measures for allergy and asthma in children
    Soyiri, Ireneous N.
    Nwaru, Bright I.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    PEDIATRIC ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY, 2016, 27 (08) : 779 - 783
  • [27] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Breast Cancer Surgery
    Kim, Minji
    Graziano, Francis D.
    Tadros, Audree B.
    Allen Jr, Robert J.
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    CURRENT SURGERY REPORTS, 2024, 12 (05) : 67 - 75
  • [28] Correlation of PROMIS with Orthopaedic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
    Cheung, Edward C.
    Moore, Laura K.
    Flores, Sergio E.
    Lansdown, Drew A.
    Feeley, Brian T.
    Zhang, Alan L.
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2019, 7 (08)
  • [29] Patient-reported Outcome Measures for Angioedema: A Literature Review
    Brix, Anna Trier Heiberg
    Boysen, Henrik Balle
    Weller, Karsten
    Caballero, Teresa
    Bygum, Anette
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101
  • [30] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Dermatology: A Systematic Review
    Pattinson, Rachael L.
    Trialonis-Suthakharan, Nirohshah
    Gupta, Sunnia
    Henry, Alasdair L.
    Lavallee, Jacqueline F.
    Otten, Marina
    Pickles, Timothy
    Courtier, Nick
    Austin, Jennifer
    Janus, Christine
    Augustin, Matthias
    Bundy, Chris
    ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA, 2021, 101