An Opt-Out Emergency Department Screening Intervention Leads to Major Increases in Diagnosis of Syphilis

被引:3
作者
Stanford, Kimberly A. [1 ]
Mason, Joseph [2 ]
Friedman, Eleanor [2 ]
Hazra, Aniruddha [2 ]
Augustine, Erin [2 ]
Schneider, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Sect Emergency Med, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Sect Infect Dis & Global Hlth, Chicago, IL USA
来源
OPEN FORUM INFECTIOUS DISEASES | 2024年 / 11卷 / 09期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
congenital syphilis; emergency department; pregnancy; screening; syphilis; PREGNANT-WOMEN; HIV;
D O I
10.1093/ofid/ofae490
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background With rising rates of syphilis in the United States, novel strategies are needed to improve early diagnosis, particularly among priority populations such as pregnant people. As the primary source of healthcare for many communities with limited access to care, the emergency department (ED) visit represents a crucial opportunity for syphilis detection and congenital syphilis prevention.Methods This pre-post design study examined all ED encounters for 2-year periods before and after implementation of an opt-out ED syphilis screening intervention in May 2019 at a large, urban, academic ED. Data on laboratory testing, syphilis status, and demographics were extracted from the medical record. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used to examine trends in syphilis screening and diagnosis.Results Syphilis screening increased from 5209 (3.6%) to 37 289 (24.4%) encounters. Presumed active syphilis infection (PAI) increased 288%, from 161 patients (3.1% of those screened) to 624 (1.7%). The proportion of female PAI increased from 25.6% to 42.5%, despite no change in proportion of females screened. Post-intervention, 23.6% of PAI were tested for a urogenital sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the ED and 9.0% presented with symptoms of an STI by diagnosis code. Among pregnant people, screening increased from 5.9% to 49.9% of encounters, and syphilis diagnosis increased 750%, from 2 cases to 15.Conclusions Opt-out ED syphilis screening led to a dramatic increase in screening and diagnosis, especially among pregnant individuals, a priority population for congenital syphilis prevention. Most individuals with syphilis did not have STI symptoms. Opt-out screening will be an important strategy in the effort to address the syphilis epidemic. Opt-out emergency department syphilis screening led to major increases in both screening and diagnosis of syphilis among priority populations such as pregnant people and groups disproportionately affected by syphilis, most of whom presented without symptoms of a sexually transmitted infection.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Delirium screening in the emergency department: evaluation and intervention
    Tehilah Meged-Book
    Reut Frenkel
    Anna Nikonov
    Vladimir Zeldetz
    Amit Kosto
    Dan Schwarzfuchs
    Tamar Freud
    Yan Press
    Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, 13
  • [32] Opt-out bloodborne virus screening: a cross-sectional observational study in an acute medical unit
    Allen, Niamh
    Faherty, Collette
    Davies, Andre
    Lyons, Anne
    Scarry, Margarent
    Keane, Mary Bohan
    Boyle, Nicola
    O'Connell, Sarah
    McCarthy, Eithne
    Keady, Deirbhile
    Bergin, Colm
    Lee, John
    Fleming, Catherine
    Gallagher, David
    Tuite, Helen
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [33] EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SCREENING FOR SYPHILIS IN PREGNANT-WOMEN WITHOUT PRENATAL-CARE
    ERNST, AA
    ROMOLO, R
    NICK, T
    ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1993, 22 (05) : 781 - 785
  • [34] Assessing patients' attitudes to opt-out HIV rapid screening in community dental clinics: A cross-sectional Canadian experience
    Brondani M.
    Chang S.
    Donnelly L.
    BMC Research Notes, 9 (1)
  • [35] Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on an emergency department-based opt-out HIV screening program in a South Florida hospital: An interrupted time series analysis, July 2018-March 2021
    Niu, Jianli
    Sareli, Candice
    Eckardt, Paula A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2022, 50 (09) : 994 - 998
  • [36] Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs: Future Directions for Screening and Intervention in the Emergency Department
    Cunningham, Rebecca M.
    Bernstein, Steven L.
    Walton, Maureen
    Broderick, Kerry
    Vaca, Federico E.
    Woolard, Robert
    Bernstein, Edward
    Blow, Fred
    D'Onofrio, Gail
    ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2009, 16 (11) : 1078 - 1088
  • [37] Emergency department patient perceptions and preferences on opt-in rapid HIV screening program components
    Merchant, Roland C.
    Clark, Melissa A.
    Seage, George R., III
    Mayer, Kenneth H.
    DeGruttola, Victor G.
    Becker, Bruce M.
    AIDS CARE-PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIO-MEDICAL ASPECTS OF AIDS/HIV, 2009, 21 (04): : 490 - 500
  • [38] Feasibility of Emergency Department Bilingual Computerized Alcohol Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment
    Vaca, Federico
    Winn, Diane
    Anderson, Craig
    Kim, Doug
    Arcila, Mauricio
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE, 2010, 31 (04) : 264 - 269
  • [39] Increased syphilis testing and detection of late latent syphilis among women after switching from risk-based to opt-out testing strategy in an urban Australian sexual health clinic: a retrospective observational study
    Gupta, Palak
    Fairley, Christopher K.
    Chen, Marcus Y.
    Bradshaw, Catriona S.
    Fehler, Glenda
    Plummer, Erica L.
    Vodstrcil, Lenka A.
    Tran, Julien
    Aung, Ei T.
    Chow, Eric P. F.
    LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC, 2023, 40
  • [40] Impact of routine opt-out HIV/HCV screening on testing uptake at a syringe services program: An interrupted time series analysis
    Bartholomew, Tyler S.
    Tookes, Hansel E.
    Serota, David P.
    Behrends, Czarina N.
    Forrest, David W.
    Feaster, Daniel J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2020, 84