Network governance and reflexivity in fisheries management: a case study of Northern Ireland

被引:1
作者
McAteer, Benedict [1 ]
Flannery, Wesley [1 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Nat & Built Environm, Belfast, North Ireland
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Reflexivity; network governance; network learning; receptivity; co-management; fisheries management; SOCIAL NETWORKS; ADAPTIVE COMANAGEMENT; RESOURCE-MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MARINE; INNOVATION; TRANSITIONS; DEVOLUTION; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1080/1523908X.2024.2395860
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Network governance arrangements, wherein resource users are empowered, are vital for ocean sustainability. These arrangements are critical to implementing innovative practices, particularly those developed to address the negative impacts of top-down management. The adoption of networked governance can foster resource management capacity and equitable decision-making. Research has focused on social ties within networks but has provided a somewhat limited account of how networks evolve to instil novel practices. To implement new practices, networks must engage in reflexive governance. Reflexivity is underpinned by actors' receptivity to change and network learning. Actors' receptivity to change relates to whether they acknowledge past failures and how novel management ideas become accepted. Network learning is the degree of change instigated by actors' reflexive processes. Drawing on the receptivity and network learning theories, and informed by semi-structured interviews, an assessment was conducted on how a fisheries management network in Northern Ireland has reflexively evolved to implement new practices. Findings illustrate that the network has reflexively redesigned how they collaborate, share knowledge, and contribute to policymaking. Demonstrating single- and double-loop learning, these developments have been derived from reflections on the failure of past processes and the instigation of more co-creative processes that benefit all network actors.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 33
页数:13
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [21] Participatory governance in Lake Victoria (Kenya) fisheries: whose voices are heard?
    Etiegni, Christine Adhiambo
    Irvine, Kenneth
    Kooy, Michelle
    [J]. MARITIME STUDIES, 2020, 19 (04) : 489 - 507
  • [22] Does marine planning enable progress towards adaptive governance in marine systems? Lessons from Scotland's regional marine planning process
    Greenhill, L.
    Stojanovic, T. A.
    Tett, P.
    [J]. MARITIME STUDIES, 2020, 19 (03) : 299 - 315
  • [23] Hendriks C.M., 2007, J. Environ. Pol. Plann., V9, P333, DOI [10.1080/15239080701622790, DOI 10.1080/15239080701622790]
  • [24] Jeffrey P., 2004, ENVIRON SCI-TOKYO, V1, P277, DOI [DOI 10.1080/15693430412331291661, https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430412331291661]
  • [25] Learning in sustainable natural resource management: Challenges and opportunities in the Pacific
    Keen, Meg
    Mahanty, Sango
    [J]. SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2006, 19 (06) : 497 - 513
  • [26] A "learning paradox" in maritime spatial planning
    Keijser, Xander
    Toonen, Hilde
    van Tatenhove, Jan
    [J]. MARITIME STUDIES, 2020, 19 (03) : 333 - 346
  • [27] Unravelling Persistent Problems to Transformative Marine Governance
    Kelly, Christina
    Ellis, Geraint
    Flannery, Wesley
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2019, 6
  • [28] Conceptualising change in marine governance: Learning from Transition Management
    Kelly, Christina
    Ellis, Geraint
    Flannery, Wesley
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2018, 95 : 24 - 35
  • [29] Knowles M. S., 2014, The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development
  • [30] Social learning: A knowledge and capacity building approach for adaptive co-management of contested landscapes
    Leys, Andrea J.
    Vanclay, Jerome K.
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2011, 28 (03) : 574 - 584