The Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes to Measure Treatment Satisfaction in Drug Development

被引:0
作者
Navas, Carolina [1 ]
Minton, Alexandra Palmer [2 ]
Rodriguez-Leboeuf, Ana Maria [1 ]
机构
[1] IQVIA, Patient Ctr Solut, Madrid, Spain
[2] IQVIA, Patient Ctr Solut, Boston, MA USA
关键词
CHRONIC ILLNESS; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION; MEDICATION; CARE; ADHERENCE; VALIDITY; PREFERENCES; MEDICINES;
D O I
10.1007/s40271-024-00702-w
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Treatment satisfaction is a person's rating of his or her treatment experience, including processes and outcomes. It is directly related to treatment adherence, which may be predictive of treatment effectiveness in clinical and real-world research. Consequently, patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments have been developed to incorporate patient experience throughout various stages of drug development and routine care. PRO instruments enable clinicians and researchers to evaluate and compare treatment satisfaction data in different clinical settings. It is important to select fit-for-purpose PRO instruments that have demonstrated adequate levels of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change to support their use. Some of these instruments are unidimensional while some are multidimensional; some are generic and can be applied across different therapeutic areas, while others have been developed for use in a specific treatment modality or condition. This article describes the role of treatment satisfaction in drug development as well as regulatory and Health Technology Assessment (HTA) decision making and calls for more widespread use of carefully selected treatment satisfaction PRO instruments in early- and late-phase drug development.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 617
页数:15
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Validating the "Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication" in Persian, and Evaluating Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients With Psoriasis
    Abdshah, Alireza
    Parsaeian, Mahboubeh
    Nasimi, Maryam
    Ghiasi, Maryam
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2022, 29 : 16 - 20
  • [2] Development of the cancer therapy satisfaction questionnaire: Item generation and content validity testing
    Abetz, L
    Coombs, JH
    Keininger, DL
    Earle, CC
    Wade, C
    Bury-Maynard, D
    Copley-Merriman, K
    Hsu, MA
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 : S41 - S53
  • [3] Afinitor, 2018, EPAR SUMMARY PUBLIC
  • [4] Reliability and validity: Importance in Medical Research
    Ahmed, Ishtiaq
    Ishtiaq, Sundas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 71 (10) : 2401 - 2406
  • [5] Patient-Centric Product Development: A Summary of Select Regulatory CMC and Device Considerations
    Algorri, Marquerita
    Cauchon, Nina S.
    Christian, Twinkle
    O'Connell, Chelsea
    Vaidya, Pujita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 112 (04) : 922 - 936
  • [6] EDITS: Development of questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction with treatments for erectile dysfunction
    Althof, SE
    Corty, EW
    Levine, SB
    Levine, F
    Burnett, AL
    McVary, K
    Stecher, V
    Seftel, AD
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1999, 53 (04) : 793 - 799
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2024, HTA EVALUATION METHO
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2023, USING PATIENT REPORT
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2023, DTSQ - Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2018, METHODS IDENTIFY WHA